Articles

Protect, Preserve, and Conserve in Environmental English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Collocation and Semantic Preference

Environmental discourse frequently employs the near-synonymous verbs protect, preserve, and conserve to describe forms of ecological stewardship. Although the three verbs share a broad semantic domain, their actual distribution may reveal differences in collocational behavior and semantic preference. This study investigates the collocational profiles and semantic preferences of protect, preserve, and conserve in contemporary environmental English using a specialized 10-million-word corpus, the Contemporary Environmental English Corpus (CEEC-10M), comprising policy and treaty documents, academic environmental writing, and environmental journalism published between 2016 and 2026. Using AntConc 4.2, the study examines the target verbs and their recurrent collocates within a symmetrical L5-R5 window. Candidate collocates are filtered using a minimum raw-frequency threshold of 15 and an MI threshold of 4.5, followed by concordance inspection and semantic categorization. The results indicate three partially overlapping but distinguishable lexical profiles. Protect shows a broad preference for vulnerable people, species, habitats, ecosystems, and other entities conceptualized as exposed to harm or external pressure. Preserve is more strongly associated with biodiversity, cultural heritage, integrity, historical sites, and existing ecological or cultural states, suggesting a preference for continuity and maintenance. Conserve is particularly associated with water resources, energy, natural resources, soil, and ecosystems, reflecting a stronger orientation toward resource management and sustainable use. The findings demonstrate that near-synonymous verbs cannot be adequately distinguished through dictionary definitions alone. Corpus evidence provides a more precise account of their preferred lexical and semantic environments and offers implications for Environmental English, English for Specific Purposes, and advanced EFL vocabulary instruction.

A Cross-Linguistic Study of Lexical Compatibility in Germanic Languages

Lexical compatibility plays a crucial role in the formation and interpretation of word combinations across languages. It reflects the semantic, syntactic, and collocational constraints that determine the co-occurrence of lexical units in discourse. This study investigates the principle of lexical compatibility in selected Germanic languages, with particular emphasis on English and German. Employing a comparative linguistic approach, the research examines how lexical items combine to form meaningful word combinations and identifies both common and language-specific patterns of lexical selection. The study draws on theoretical perspectives from lexical semantics, collocation studies, and corpus linguistics to analyze compatibility relations among lexical units. The findings suggest that while Germanic languages share a number of compatibility patterns due to their common linguistic heritage, significant differences emerge as a result of language-specific semantic preferences, cultural influences, and structural developments. The research contributes to the understanding of lexical combinability and provides insights into the mechanisms underlying word combination formation in Germanic languages. The results may also have practical implications for foreign language teaching, translation studies, and lexicographic research.