Abstract :

The Job Creation Law was formed using the omnibus law method to achieve its goals to make changes to various laws and regulations equivalent to it to achieve the Law’s goals. Unfortunately, there are problems in regulations that cause Indigenous Peoples and their traditional rights to become unprotected, causing legal uncertainty for investment companies that are reluctant to carry out their business activities in Indigenous Peoples’ territories. This can hamper the realization of the ease of doing business that the Job Creation Law intends to achieve. Therefore, the Job Creation Law should review the regulations regarding investment companies’ activities that carry out their activities in Indigenous Peoples’ territories. The research method used is normative juridical method, emphasizing secondary data collection aiming to look for the role of the Job Creation Law to provide legal protection for Indigenous Peoples while providing legal certainty and doing business to investors who carry out business activities in Indigenous Peoples’ territories. To provide business convenience for these companies and protect Indigenous Peoples’ traditional rights, the Job Creation Law should change the provisions in the Village Law.

---

Keywords :

Investment; Indigenous Peoples; Job Creation Law; Legal Certainty; Omnibus Law.

---

References :

1. Consideration point b from Indonesia, Law Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 11 Year 2020 Concerning Job Creation. Law 11 Of 2020. State Gazette Of The Republic Of Indonesia Year 2020 Number 245. Supplement To The State Gazette Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 6573.
2. Consideration point c from Indonesia, Law Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 11 Year 2020 Concerning Job Creation. Law 11 Of 2020. State Gazette Of The Republic Of Indonesia Year 2020 Number 245. Supplement To The State Gazette Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 6573.
3. Antoni Putra, “Penerapan Omnibus Law Dalam Upaya Reformasi Regulasi,” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 17, no. 12 (2020): 1–10.
4. Vincent Suriadinata, “Penyusunan Undang-Undang Di Bidang Investasi: Kajian Pembentukan Omnibus Law Di Indonesia,” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 115–132.
5. Systematic interpretation of law can be interpreted as departing from the notion that one legal rule with another legal rule is interrelated, meaning that there is no legal rule that stands alone, every legal rule has a place in the legal field. That place becomes a certain place. This is a consequence of the interdependence of each social phenomenon. Some legal rules that contain several equations or aim to achieve the same object are a set of certain rules that recognize an internal interrelation or innerlijke samenhang into a legal institution or rechtsinstituut, for example a legal institution concerning marriage. There is a relationship between legal institutions. Legal institutions that contain equality together constitute a legal field or Thus, for example, all customary law institutions in Indonesia together constitute one large legal field that is certain in nature and is called Indonesian customary law. Between the field of Indonesian customary law and other legal fields – for example, the field of constitutional law – there is a big difference, namely a deep difference in nature, although there are similarities. See further on Utrecht, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, (Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru, 1983), p. 122.
6. See more at Investment Law regulation in Law Number 25 of 2007 at Sentosa Sembiring, Hukum Investasi (Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2010).
7. Muhammad Insa Ansari, “Omnibus Law Untuk Menata Regulasi Penanaman Modal,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9, no. 1 (2020): 71.
8. Herein after in this paper, Indigenous People will be defined as stated in the ILO Convention C169 – Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989, as in Indonesian Law it is called the Masyarakat Hukum Adat.
9. Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI, Panduan Pemasyarakatan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Sesuai dengan Urutan Bab, Pasal, dan Ayat, Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Jakarta, 2007, 92-93.
10. Article 1 Point 1 Regulation of Minister of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 52 of 2014 Concerning the Guidelines for the Recognition and Protection of Indigenous People. Permendagri Number 52 of 2014. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 951.
11. See more at Ananda Prima Yurista. Pengejawantahan Hak Tradisional Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Pengaturan Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir Dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. Vol. 13 N0. 02 – Juni 2016:203 – 212
12. Sulaiman Sulaiman, Muhammad Adli, and Teuku Muttaqin Mansur, “Ketidakteraturan Hukum Pengakuan Dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Di Indonesia,” Law Reform 15, no. 1 (2019): 12.
13. Timoteus Marten, Masyarakat Adat Tolak PT Merauke Rayon Jaya, 2020, access from https://jubi.co.id/masyarakat-adat-tolak-pt-merauke-rayon-jaya/ pada 9 April 2020 At 23.20 WIB
14. Agus Mawan, Orang Bunggu Perjuangkan Wilayah Adat Mereka, 2019 access from https://www.mongabay.co.id/2019/10/29/orang-bunggu-perjuangkan-wilayah-adat-mereka/ pada 10 April 01.23 WIB.
15. Indra Nugraha dan Yusy Marie, Perjuangkan Tanah yang Diklaim Perusahaan Sawit, Tiga Warga Kotawaringin Timur Malah Ditahan, 2020, access from https://www.mongabay.co.id/2020/03/12/perjuangkan-tanah-yang-diklaim-perusahaan-sawit-tiga-warga-kotawaringin-timur-malah-ditahan/ pada 10 April 00.12 WIB
16. Johnny Ibrahim, Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006).
17. Visser;t Hoft, Penemuan Hukum, judul asli Rechtsvinding, diterjemahkan oleh B. Arief Sidharta, (Bandung: Laboratorium Hukum FH Univ. Parahiayangan, 2001), Pp.25
18. Jazim Hamidi, Hermeneutika Hukum, Teori Penemuan Hukum Baru dengan Interpretasi Teks, UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2005, Pp. 53.
19. Philipus M. Hadjon dan Tatiek Djatmiati, Argumentasi Hukum, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2005, Pp. 26.
20. Klug, Constitutionalism, Comparative, Editor(s): Neil J. Smelser, Paul B. Baltes, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pergamon, 2001, Pp. 2643-2648.
21. See more at Sekretariat Jendral MPR RI, Cit., p. 44.
22. Abdurrahman, Draft Laporan Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Mekanisme Pengakuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat (Jakarta: Disusun Oleh Tim Dibawah Pimpinan : Dr. H. Abdurrahman, S.H., M.H. PUSAT PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN SISTEM HUKUM NASIONAL BADAN PEMBINAAN HUKUM NASIONAL KEMENTERIAN HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA R.I., 2015). p. 27-36, 56-83
23. The provisions in other laws and regulations do not give special authority and rights to indigenous See and compared to Zayanti Mandasari, “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Masyarakat Hukum Adat (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi),” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 21, no. 2 (2014): 227–250; Amrina Rosyada, Esmi Warassih, and Ratna Herawati, “Perlindungan Konstitusional Terhadap Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Sosial (Constitutional Protection of Indigenous People in Achieving Social Justice),” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 20, no. 1 (2018): 1–22.
24. Agnes Fitryantica, “Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Melalui Konsep Omnibus Law,” Gema Keadilan 6, no. 3 (2019): 300–316, https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/gk/article/view/6751; Sembiring, Hukum Investasi, 21–36.
25. Dhaniswara K. Harjono, Hukum Penanaman Modal (Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007); Sembiring, Hukum Investasi.
26. Lalu Sabardi, “Konstruksi Makna Yuridis Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Pasal 18B Uudn Ri Tahun 1945 Untuk Identifikasi Adanya Masyarakat Hukum Adat,” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 44, no. 2 (2014): 170.
27. Grammatical interpretation is defined as the interpretation of words in law according to the norms of language or grammatical norms. Language with law is closely related, law is impossible without language, law requires words or language because language is the only tool used by legislators to express their will. Grammatical interpretation is the right effort to try to understand a statutory rule text. Formulating a law or an agreement should use a language understood by the community which is the objective of the legal arrangement. Because the interpretation of laws is basically an explanation in terms of the language used, it is clear that the making of a rule of law must be bound by language. See Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang, 2006, p. 220.
28. Based on The Handbook of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia the formulation is regulated by laws contained in the Article or paragraph of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which means that the matters regulated in that provision must be formulated by special laws issued for that purpose. As for what is regulated in the laws contained in the Article or paragraph of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, it means that the matters regulated in that provision can become the material of a law or several laws that are not specifically issued for that purpose. Compare with Sekretariat Jendral MPR RI, Cit., p. 44.
29. Ibrahim, Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif; Afif Khalid, “PENAFSIRAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA,” Al’ Adi IV, no. 11 (2014): 9–36.
30. Pentingnya Harmonisasi Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Kajian Kebijakan dan Hukum Kedirgantaraan. Access from https://puskkpa.lapan.go.id/ files_arsip/Soegiyono_Pentingnya_Harmoniasi_2015.pdf. tanggal 24 Juni 2020 At 13.10 WIB
31. Mulyanto Mulyanto, “Penguatan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa Dari Perspektif Kajian Yuridis,” Journal of Indonesian Adat Law (JIAL) 2, no. 3 (2018): 74–104; Zain Mochamad Adib and Ahmad Siddiq, “Pengakuan Atas Kedudukan Dan Keberadaan Masyarakat Hukum Adat (MHA) Pasca Dibentuknya Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 2 (2015): 63–76.
32. Ibrahim, Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif.
34. Jawahir Thontowi, “Perlindungan Dan Pengakuan Masyarakat Adat Dan Tantangannya Dalam Hukum Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 20, no. 1 (2013): 21–36.
35. Ibrahim, Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif.
36. Mochamad Adib and Siddiq, “Pengakuan Atas Kedudukan Dan Keberadaan Masyarakat Hukum Adat (MHA) Pasca Dibentuknya Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa.”
37. Sulaiman, Adli, and Mansur, “Ketidakteraturan Hukum Pengakuan Dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Di Indonesia”; Thontowi, “Perlindungan Dan Pengakuan Masyarakat Adat Dan Tantangannya Dalam Hukum Indonesia”; Mandasari, “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Masyarakat Hukum Adat (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi).”
38. Mulyanto, “Penguatan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa Dari Perspektif Kajian Yuridis.”
39. Pudjo Utomo, “Omnibus Law : Dalam Perspektif Hukum Responsif,” Nurani Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 33; Ansari, “Omnibus Law Untuk Menata Regulasi Penanaman Modal.”
40. Compared to Agung Sujati Winata, “Perlindungan Investor Asing Dalam Kegiatan Penanaman Modal Asing Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Negara,” Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2018): 127.
41. Based on Indonesian Law, at the time of establishing a new law, research is carried out first which is contained in an Academic Manuscript (Law Number 12/2011 concerning The Establishment of Legislation in Indonesia
42. Academic Paper Rancangan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, 24.
43. Bryan A. Garner,  al.(Eds.). Black’s Law Dictionary Ninth Edition. St. Paul: West Publishing Co., 2009, p. 186.
44. Putra, “Penerapan Omnibus Law Dalam Upaya Reformasi Regulasi.”
45. Ansari, “Omnibus Law Untuk Menata Regulasi Penanaman Modal.”
46. R A S Hernawati and J T Suroso, “Kepastian Hukum Dalam Hukum Investasi Di Indonesia Melalui Omnibus Law,” Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen … 4, no. 1 (2020): 392–408, http://journal.stiemb.ac.id/index.php/mea/article/view/557; Ansari, “Omnibus Law Untuk Menata Regulasi Penanaman Modal.”