Abstract :

The financial support plays a role in the most stage of agricultural sector. There are many literatures in this field, unfortunately, none of these maps in order to give the direction for the impactful future studies. This study quantitatively analyses 224 articles on Agricultural Financing literature during ten years period. Our selected papers were gained from the indexed-Scopus database that represented by English-language articles. Using a bibliometric approach, we investigate the field’s performance and evolution of the agricultural financing literature. A significant increase in the number of publications was seen in the last period of our observation. We find the most frequent author is Turvey, CG who comes from the most relevant country. We noted that the leader of author and country are not necessarily the impactful one. However, the Agricultural Finance Review occurs as the most frequent and impactful journal. We offer future research directions on agricultural financing, rice/maize, productivity, sustainability and smallholder farmer. This study gives the information that there is a rarely occurrence of Indonesian as the country’s contributor. Therefore, there is a great opportunity for Indonesian scholars to bring a novel from Indonesia’s agricultural wisdom. We encourage Indonesian Scholars to enhance the quantity and quality publications.

---

Keywords :

Agricultural Financing; Bibliometric Analysis; Future Directions; Mapping; Scopus

---

References :

1. E. Saqib, J. K. M. Kuwornu, S. Panezia, and U. Ali, “Factors determining subsistence farmers’ access to agricultural credit in flood-prone areas of Pakistan,” Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 262–268, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.kjss.2017.06.001.

2. BPS, “The Result of Inter-Census Agricultural Survey 2018,” Jakarta Indonesia, 2018.
3. T. Sheikh, E. Elahi, M. Abid, S. Fatima, and N. Fatima, “Effect of sewage water on the cauliflower productivity in Punjab, Pakistan,” J. Agric. Soc. Sci., vol. Vol. 8, No, no. January, pp. 37–40, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=PK2012000616.
4. BPS, “Harvest Area and Rice Production in Indonesia 2021,” Jakarta, Indonesia, 2021.
5. N. Rashid, “Achieving SDGs in Tanzania: Is there a nexus between land tenure Security, agricultural credits and rice Productivity?,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 164, no. April 2020, p. 105216, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105216.
6. A. Chandio, Y. Jiang, A. T. Gessesse, and R. Dunya, “The Nexus of Agricultural Credit, Farm Size and Technical Efficiency in Sindh, Pakistan: A Stochastic Production Frontier Approach,” J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 348–354, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2017.11.001.
7. H. Abdallah, “Agricultural credit and technical efficiency in Ghana: is there a nexus?,” Agric. Financ. Rev., vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 309–324, 2016, doi: 10.1108/AFR-01-2016-0002.
8. R. Khandker and G. B. Koolwal, “How has microcredit supported agriculture? Evidence using panel data from Bangladesh,” Agric. Econ. (United Kingdom), vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 157–168, 2016, doi: 10.1111/agec.12185.
9. Obaidullah, “Enhancing food security with Islamic microfinance: insights from some recent experiments,” Agric. Financ. Rev., vol. Vol. 75 Is, pp. 142–168, 2015.
10. A. Chandio, Y. Jiang, F. Wei, and X. Guangshun, “Effects of agricultural credit on wheat productivity of small farms in Sindh, Pakistan: Are short-term loans better?,” Agric. Financ. Rev., vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 592–610, 2018, doi: 10.1108/AFR-02-2017-0010.
11. Narayanan, “The Productivity of Agricultural Credit in India Sudha,” Pap. Knowl. . Towar. a Media Hist. Doc., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 1–37, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijrhss.org/pdf/v2-i8/4.pdf%0Ahttps://www.epw.in/journal/2016/8/farmer-producer-companies.html%0Ahttps://www.epw.in/system/files/pdf/2016_51/8/Farmer_Producer_Companies_0.pdf%0Ahttp://www.ijmrr.com/admin/upload_data/journal_NaserMohammadoghli___.

12. Pawitri, K. Budiraharjo, and B. M. Setiawan, “The Production Efficiency in Organic Rice Farming,” vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 450–457, 2021.
13. Ullah, G. P. Shivakoti, F. Zulfiqar, and M. A. Kamran, “Farm risks and uncertainties: Sources, impacts and management,” Outlook Agric., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 199–205, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0030727016665440.
14. G. Turvey, “Policy rationing in rural credit markets,” Agric. Financ. Rev., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 209–232, 2013, doi: 10.1108/AFR-04-2013-0020.
15. Wossen and T. Berger, “Climate variability, food security and poverty: Agent-based assessment of policy options for farm households in Northern Ghana,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 47, pp. 95–107, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.11.009.
16. J. Kabir, M. Alauddin, and S. Crimp, “Farm-level adaptation to climate change in Western Bangladesh: An analysis of adaptation dynamics, profitability and risks,” Land use policy, vol. 64, pp. 212–224, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.026.

17. Asante-Addo, J. Mockshell, M. Zeller, K. Siddig, and I. S. Egyir, “Agricultural credit provision: what really determines farmers’ participation and credit rationing?,” Agric. Financ. Rev., vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 239–256, 2017, doi: 10.1108/AFR-02-2016-0010.
18. Kumar, A. K. Mishra, S. Saroj, and P. K. Joshi, “Institutional versus non-institutional credit to agricultural households in India: Evidence on impact from a national farmers’ survey,” Econ. Syst., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 420–432, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.10.005.
19. M. Sweileh, “Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on food security in the context of climate change from 1980 to 2019,” Agric. Food Secur., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40066-020-00266-6.
20. Li, J. Liu, H. Yang, J. Chen, and J. Xiong, “A bibliometric analysis of literature on vegetable prices at domestic and international markets-a knowledge graph approach,” Agric., vol. 11, no. 10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/agriculture11100951.
21. Sharma, R. Sisodia, N. Delhi, and N. Delhi, “Bibliometric Analysis of Peer Reviewed Literature on Sustainable Agriculture Research – Challenges and Prospects,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 16–37, 2021.
22. Pandey, P. Bandyopadhyay, S. Kadam, and M. Singh, “Management of Environmental Quality : An International Journal Article information : Bibliometric study on relationship of agricultural credit with farmer distress,” Manag. Environ. Qual., vol. Vol. 29 No, pp. 278–288, 2018.
23. Bayu, D. Nandiyanto, M. K. Biddinika, and F. Triawan, “Indonesian Journal of Science & Technology How Bibliographic Dataset Portrays D ecreasing N umber of S cientific P ublication from Indonesia,” Indones. J. Sci. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 154–175, 2020.
24. K. Hassan, M. M. Alshater, R. Hasan, and A. B. Bhuiyan, “Islamic microfinance: A bibliometric review,” Glob. Financ. J., vol. 49, no. June, p. 100651, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100651.
25. Seglen, Use of citation analysis and other bibliometric methods in evaluation of the quality of research. 1989.
26. Ding and B. Cronin, “Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem,” Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 80–96, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.002.
27. J. V. Chiu, S. V Khantachavana, C. G. Turvey, and L. J. V. Chiu, “Risk rationing and the demand for agricultural credit : a comparative investigation of Mexico and China,” 2014, doi: 10.1108/AFR-05-2014-0011.
28. Elahi, M. Abid, L. Zhang, S. ul Haq, and J. G. M. Sahito, “Agricultural advisory and financial services; farm level access, outreach and impact in a mixed cropping district of Punjab, Pakistan,” Land use policy, vol. 71, no. December 2017, pp. 249–260, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.006.
29. C. Aker, “Dial ‘ A ’ for agriculture : a review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries,” vol. 42, pp. 631–647, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x.
30. W. Boyack and R. Klavans, “Full-Text Citation Analysis : A New Method to Enhance,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 64, no. July, pp. 1852–1863, 2010, doi: 10.1002/asi.
31. Paltrinieri, M. K. Hassan, S. Bahoo, and A. Khan, “A bibliometric review of sukuk literature,” Int. Rev. Econ. Financ., no. September 2018, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2019.04.004.
32. K. Baker, N. Pandey, S. Kumar, and A. Haldar, “A bibliometric analysis of board diversity : Current status , development, and future research directions,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 108, no. November 2019, pp. 232–246, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.025.

33. Zhang, D. Lim, Y. Yao, C. Dong, and Z. Feng, “Global Research Trends in Radiotherapy for Gliomas: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis,” World Neurosurg., pp. 1–8, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.001.