Abstract :
The Risk Management System is one the most important aspect in organizations acting in the medical field. The private medical institutions have to ensure a proper risk management system. In order to ensure this system, they have to ensure a proper organizational effort, that includes financial investment and personnel training in order to ensure a functional risk management system. Our research is focused on the perception of key decision makers in private medical institutions regarding the organizational effort in order to ensure a functional risk management system. Because the private institutions have to ensure profitability and also to be competitive, we also research their approach on the risk management system as a quality differentiator on the market and not only as a mandatory regulation. The medical field is overall one of the most regulated fields and has additional specific regulation for each country.
Keywords :
Competitivity, Organizational Effort, Private Medical Institutions, Risk Management, Safety.References :
1. Le DantecTannguy, Managementulproiectelorprinexemple, Ed. C.H.Beck, Bucureşti, 2009.
2. Baru, Paul Emanuel, Teza de doctorat: Cercetări in analizarisculuipentrudispozitiveelectronicemedicale, Universitatea Tehnica din Cluj-Napoca, 2014
3. “The Concentration of Health Care Spending”, National Institute for Health Care Management, 2012;Voinescu, Leonardo, Managementulrisculuiîncazulorganizațiilorprestatoare de servicii de sănătate, Calitatea: Acces la Succes; București, 2013
4. RankoSzuhanek, Teza de doctorat: Ingineriariscului in managementulsistemuluisanitar din Romania, Universitatea PolitehnicaTimișoara, 2016
5. Abrudan I. Responsibility or the manager’s ― golden cage, Review of Management and Economic Engineering, Cluj-Napoca, 2012
6. Boyle, S., United Kingdom (England): Health system review, Health Systems in Transition, 2011
7. Iatan Monica, Managementulrisculuiînorganizaţii, Rev. Market Watch, Bucuresti, 2010
8. Global Outlook: Healthcare,” The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2014;
9. Izvercianu M. Riscșisustenabilitate. Ed. PolitehnicaTimișoara, 2008
10. Kouns J, Daniel M., Information Technology Risk Management in Enterprise Environments: A Review of Industry Practices and a Practical Guide to Risk Management, New Jersey, 2010.
11. McDaid, D., Wiley, M., Maresso, A., &Mossialos, E., Ireland: Health system review, Health Systems in Transition, 2009
12. Petrescu, I., Fundamentelemanagementuluiorganizatiei. Abordarimoderne, Sibiu, 2005
13. Nalejska, Ewelina; Mączyńska, Ewa and Lewandowska, Marzena Anna, “Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers: Tools in Personalized Oncology”, Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy, 2014;
14. Szuhanek R., Szuhanek Camelia, Fleser T., Maris Simina, Evaluation of medical engineered plastics processing risk, RevistaMaterialeplastice, Bucuresti, 2015
15. Wickham, C, Borowitz, M, O’Dougherty, S., Kazakhstan Health Reform Overview, 2010
16. Lippi G, Guidi GC. Risk management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing, 2007
17. Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH and al. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus, 2014
18. Raport de activitate – UnitățiSanitare, Institutul National de Statistica, 2018
19. Ripley, Will, “Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto: Japan’s robot revolution”, CNN, 2014;
20. Wainwright, Oliver, “The first 3D-printed pill opens up a world of downloadable medicine”, The Guardian, 2015;
21. “Nurses Say Lack of Interoperability Contributes to Medical Errors”, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, March 18, 2015;
22. Digital Health Solutions Expected to Save U.S. Healthcare System More Than $100 Billion Over Next Four Years, Accenture Finds”, Accenture, 2015;
23. CEO Survey Healthcare Insights”, PwC, 2014;
24. “Japan’s Aging Population Woes Worsen with New Record Low Birth-Rate in 2014”, TIME, 2015;