Abstract :

The financial difficulties experienced by PT. Garuda Indonesia, characterized by its inability to meet its obligations to several creditors, resulted in the temporary delisting of its shares from the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) on June 18, 2021. This situation was further exacerbated by the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, which led to a decline in revenue due to a decrease in passenger numbers and air traffic.

Garuda Indonesia initiated a restructuring effort through the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) route with a number of creditors. This resulted in an extension of the payment terms, a conversion of debt to equity, and a modification of the debt structure. The company also implemented improvements to its operational practices aimed at reducing costs. These efforts have produced positive outcomes, including an increase in equity and a decrease in the company’s liabilities.Top of FormBottom of Form Garuda Indonesia also increased the company’s capital through Additional Capital with Pre-emptive Rights (PMHMETD), Additional Capital without Pre-emptive Rights (PMTHMETD) and investment from the government of the Republic of Indonesia through State Investment (PNM).

After completing the restructuring process, Garuda Indonesia (GIAA) shares were free from suspension and were able to return to the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with an initial price of Rp.204. This study was conducted to determine the fair value of GIAA shares upon their return to IDX in early January 2023. The study utilized two methods: the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method and the Relative Valuation method. The DCF method resulted in a fair value of Rp. 165.3 for the shares, implying that the initial issuance value was overvalued by 18.97%. The Relative Valuation method EV/sales ratio, yielded a fair value of Rp. 929 for the shares, suggesting that the current issuance value was undervalued by 355%.

---

Keywords :

Company restructuring, DCV Valuation, Relative valuation

---

References :

1. T. Rothaermel, Strategic Management, McGraw-Hill, 2021.
2. Tan, W. L. Chua, C. K. Chow, M. C. Chong and B. C. Chew, “PESTLE Analysis on Toyota Hybrid Vehicles,” IC-TMT, 2012.
3. I. Sunjoko and E. J. Arilyn, “EFFECTS OF INVENTORY TURNOVER, TOTAL ASSET TURNOVER, FIXED ASSET TURNOVER, CURRENT RATIO AND AVERAGE COLLECTION PERIOD ON PROFITABILITY,” Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, vol. XVIII, no. 1, pp. 79-83, Juni 2016.
4. Tissen and R. Sneidere, “THE THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ANALYSIS OF TURNOVER RATIOS MODIFICATION FOR THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS ACTIVITY,” in New Challenges of Economic and Business Development – 2018: Productivity and Economic Growth, Riga, 2018.
5. M. Bragg, Financial Analysis, Business Decision Guide, 2nd Edition ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2014.
6. Arsyad, S. H. Haeruddin, M. Muslim and M. F. A. Pelu, “The effect of activity ratios, liquidity, and profitability on the dividend payout ratio,” Indonesia Accounting Journal, vol. III, no. 1, pp. 36-44, 2021.
7. Husna and I. Satria, “Effects of return on asset, debt to asset ratio, current ratio, firm size, and dividend payout ratio on firm value,” International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. IX, no. 9, pp. 50-54, 2019.
8. Sukalmulja, Analisis Laporan Keuangan Sebagai Dasar Pengambilan Keputusan Investasi, Yogyakarta: ANDI Yogyakarta, 2019.
9. Anggraini and A. Arisman, “ANALYSIS OF INFLUENCE OF QUICK RATIO, TOTAL ASSET TURN OVER, AND DEBT TO EQUITY TO PROFITABILITY (EMPIRICAL STUDIES AT IDX-LISTED MANUFACTURING COMPANIES at 2017-2019),” Journal Competency of Business, vol. V, no. 1, pp. 75-78, 2021.
10. I. Amanda, “The Impact of Cash Turnover, Receivable Turnover, Inventory Turnover, Current Ratio and Debt to Equity Ratio on Profitability,” Journal of research in management, vol. II, no. 2, pp. 14-22, 2019.
11. N. Nariswari and N. M. Nugraha, “Profit growth: impact of net profit margin, gross profit margin and total assests turnover,” International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, vol. IX, no. 4, pp. 87-96, 2020.
12. Mahruzal and M. Khaddafi, “The Influence of Gross Profit Margin, Operating Profit Margin and Net Profit Margin on the Stock Price of Consumer Good Industryin the Indonesia Stock Exchange on 2012-2014,” International Journal of Business, Economics and Social Development, vol. I, no. 3, pp. 153-163, 2020.
13. N. Nariswara and N. M. Nugraha, “Profit Growth: Impact of Net Profit Margin, Gross Profit Margin and Total Assets Turnover,” International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, vol. IX, no. 4, pp. 87-96, 2020.
14. Ningsih and S. P. Sari, “Analysis Of The Effect Of Liquidity Ratios, Solvability Ratios And Profitability Ratios On Firm Value In Go Public Companies In The Automotive And Component Sectors,” International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), vol. III, no. 4, pp. 351-359, 2019.
15. B. Zaman, “Influence of Debt To Total Asset Ratio (DAR) Current Ratio (CR) and Total Asset Turnover (TATO) on Return On Asset (ROA) and Its Impact on Stock Prices on Mining Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008-2017,” ournal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, vol. II, no. 1, pp. 114-132, 2021.
16. W. Amelia and D. Sunarsi, “Pengaruh Return On Asset Dan Return On Equity Terhadap Debt To Equity Ratio Pada PT. Kalbe Farma, TBK,” Ad-Deenar: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, vol. IV, no. 1, pp. 105-114, 2020.
17. Gajek and Ł. Kuciński, “Complete Discounted Cash Flow Valuation,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2016.
18. Lilford, B. Maybee and D. Packey, “Cost of Capital and Discount Rates in Cash Flow Valuations for Resources Projects,” Resources Policy, vol. VIX, pp. 525-531, 2018.
19. Damodaran, Damodaran on Valuation Security Analysis for Investment and Corporate Finance, Second Edition ed., New Jeysey: Wiley Finance, 2006.
20. A. Babalola and F. R. Abiola, “Financial Ratio Analysis of Firms: A Tool for Decision Making,” International Journal of Management Sciences, vol. I, no. 4, pp. 132-137, 2013.