Abstract :

IoT provides a unified framework for coordinating the use of diverse real-world and digitally- enhanced healthcare assets. Telemedicine is appealing in poor countries because of a lack of access to healthcare services, an aging population with chronic diseases, rising healthcare expenditures, and a need to monitor patients remotely. The Internet of Things can provide individualized health services that enhance people’s quality of life while also reducing the burden on public health infrastructure. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to catalog, compare, and categorize previous research into Healthcare IoT (HIoT) systems. In order to better understand the backdrop, we looked at research articles on RFID-based Secure Wireless mobile data exchange systems in healthcare. There was also discussion of other crucial issues including security and interoperability. At the conclusion of this report, we briefly discuss the main advantages and disadvantages of each study. Lastly, there is a dearth of research into the security and interoperability concerns of IoT design in healthcare. Important outcomes of IoT in healthcare include improved information sharing, shorter hospital stays, and lower overall healthcare expenses. IoT in healthcare faced major obstacles due to concerns over patient privacy and data security.

---

Keywords :

e-health, Healthcare, Internet of things (IoT), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)

---

References :

1. B. Chander and K. Gopalakrishnan, ‘A secured and lightweight RFID-tag based authentication protocol with privacy-preserving in Telecare medicine information system’, Comput. Commun., vol. 191, pp. 425–437, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2022.05.002.
2. S. Chandra, S. Ray, and R. T. Goswami, ‘Big Data Security in Healthcare: Survey on Frameworks and Algorithms’, in 2017 IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), Hyderabad, India, Jan. 2017, pp. 89–94. doi: 10.1109/IACC.2017.0033.
3. A. K. Singh, A. Anand, Z. Lv, H. Ko, and A. Mohan, ‘A Survey on Healthcare Data: A Security Perspective’, ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl., vol. 17, no. 2s, p. 59:1-59:26, May 2021, doi: 10.1145/3422816.
4. R. Baashirah and A. Abuzneid, ‘Survey on Prominent RFID Authentication Protocols for Passive Tags’, Sensors, vol. 18, no. 10, Art. no. 10, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.3390/s18103584.
5. S. Shukla and S. J. Patel, ‘A novel ECC-based provably secure and privacy-preserving multi- factor authentication protocol for cloud computing’, Computing, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1173– 1202, May 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00607-021-01041-6.
6. P. K. D. Pramanik, G. Pareek, and A. Nayyar, ‘Chapter 14 – Security and Privacy in Remote Healthcare: Issues, Solutions, and Standards’, in Telemedicine Technologies, H. D. Jude and V. E. Balas, Eds. Academic Press, 2019, pp. 201–225. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816948-3.00014-3.
7. K. Abouelmehdi, A. Beni-Hssane, H. Khaloufi, and M. Saadi, ‘Big data security and privacy in healthcare: A Review’, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 113, pp. 73–80, Jan. 2017, doi:

8. 1016/j.procs.2017.08.292.

1. K. Ashton, ‘That “Internet of Things” Thing’, p. 1.
2. M. H. Kashani, ‘A systematic review of IoT in healthcare: Applications, techniques, and trends’, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., p. 41, 2021.
3. B. Farahani, F. Firouzi, V. Chang, M. Badaroglu, N. Constant, and K. Mankodiya, ‘Towards fog- driven IoT eHealth: Promises and challenges of IoT in medicine and healthcare’, Future Gener.

12. Syst., vol. 78, pp. 659–676, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2017.04.036.

1. M. Sheikh Sofla, M. Haghi Kashani, E. Mahdipour, and R. Faghih Mirzaee, ‘Towards effective offloading mechanisms in fog computing’, Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 1997–2042, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11042-021-11423-9.
2. R. P. Singh, M. Javaid, A. Haleem, and R. Suman, ‘Internet of things (IoT) applications to fight against COVID-19 pandemic’, Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 521– 524, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.041.
3. P. Kaur and M. Sharma, ‘A Smart and Promising Neurological Disorder Diagnostic System’, in Intelligent Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2020, pp. 241–264. doi: 1002/9781119544487.ch12.

1. A. Marengoni et al., ‘Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literature’, Ageing Res. Rev., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 430–439, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003.
2. M. Nasajpour, S. Pouriyeh, R. M. Parizi, M. Dorodchi, M. Valero, and H. R. Arabnia, ‘Internet of Things for Current COVID-19 and Future Pandemics: an Exploratory Study’, J. Healthc. Inform. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 325–364, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s41666-020-00080-6.