Abstract :

Based on the Decree of the Minister of SOE No Kep-117/M-MBU/2002 concerning the Implementation of Good Corporate Governance Practices in State-Owned Enterprises it is stated that SOEs are required to implement GCG consistently and sustainably. PT Holding X as a subsidiary of the leading SOE in the field of information, technology, and telecommunications in Indonesia are aware of the importance of implementing GCG. They believes that by implementing GCG, the overall performance of the company will grow positively. Thus, the company decided to improve its GCG quality in period 2021, yet the company has not conduct a full assessment on the impact of improving GCG quality on company performance. The goal of this research is to analyse the impact of increasing good corporate governance practices on performance at PT Holding X. This study will look at good corporate governance practices based on Ministerial Regulation Number Per-01/MBU/ 2011 concerning the Implementation of GCG in SOEs which links the results of the GCG assessment and the company’s achievements to the KPIs previously determined by the company. This study will use performance measurements based on the 4 perspectives of the balanced scorecard. There was an increase in the quality of GCG at PT Holding X by 26.32% and an increase in the performance of PT Holding X by 14.72%. This score indicates that there is a positive impact from improving the quality of GCG on improving company performance, this results is in line with the expectation of the company based on previous research results.

---

Keywords :

: Balance Scorecard, Good Corporate Governance, key performance indicator (KPI), Performance measurement, state-owned enterprise (SOE).

---

References :

1. Mitton, T. (2002). A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of financial economics, 64(2), 215-241.
2. Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2002). Corporate governance, investor protection and performance in emerging markets. Investor Protection and Performance in Emerging Markets (March 2002).
3. Darmawati, D., Khomsiyah, K., & Rahayu, R. G. (2005). Hubungan Corporate Governance dan kinerja perusahaan. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 8(1).Brown, L. D., Hua, H., and Gao, C. 2003. A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE.
4. Nuswandari, Cahyani. “Pengaruh Corporate Governance Perception Index Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Jakarta.” Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, vol. 16, no. 2, Sep. 2009.
5. Manik, T. (2011). Analisis pengaruh kepemilikan manajemen, komisaris independen, komite audit, umur perusahaan terhadap kinerja keuangan. JEMI, 2(2), 25-36Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289-1305.
6. Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., & Mustikaningtiyas, F. (2021). Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach. Heliyon, 7(3), e06453.
7. Sentono, S. (1999). Manajemen Kepegawaian. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni Bandung.
8. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. (2000). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
9. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Strategic learning & the balanced scorecard. Strategy & Leadership.