Abstract :

Science Techno Park is a facility in the form of an area specially prepared to initiate and flow knowledge and technology between R&D institutions, universities and industry. STP facilitates the growth and development of innovative start-ups through incubation activities and spin off processes. The main objective of STP is to encourage economic growth through the development of innovation potential. Science Techno Park was initiated in 2014 under PT Bogor Life Science and Technology (BLST) as a holding company owned by Bogor Agricultural University (IPB).

This study aims to identify and improve the Science Techno Park business incubation services for inwall tenants and startup companies that are fostered based on the problems that occur and are expected to increase other income from the Science Techno Park business. The method used in this study uses primary data derived from quantitative and qualitative methods obtained from questionnaires and interviews with inwall tenants and startup companies that are undergoing the Science Techno Park business incubation program. Secondary data analysis uses company reports and literature from various sources.

The conceptual framework used in this study begins with an analysis of customers of Science Techno Park business incubation service. Then analyze the external environment using general environmental analysis, industry analysis, and competitor analysis. For internal environmental analysis using resources, capabilities, and core competencies. All the results of the analysis are summarized in a SWOT analysis. From the results of the analysis, the researcher provides solutions and business strategies to solve problems experienced by Science Techno Park in fostering inwall tenants and startup companies and provide business alternatives to earn other income besides business incubation services.

The strategy proposed based on research results is a strategy of business diversification and cost leadership. In addition, a functional strategy is provided to improve company performance in the area of marketing, finance, and internal management. The researcher provide implementation plans by mapping the potential users of business incubation services and the roadmap for the development of Science Techno Park to improve business incubation services and develop other business services.

---

Keywords :

Business incubation, Cost Leadership, Diversification, Functional strategy, Science Techno Park., SWOT analysis

---

References :

1. Abdul Khalid, F., Gilbert, D., and Huq, A. (2012). Investigating the Underlying Components in Business Incubation Process in Malaysian ICT Incubators. Asian Journal Of Social Sciences and Humanities Configurations, 1(1), 88–102.
2. Al Shami, A., Lotfi, A., Coleman, S., and Dostál, P. (2014). Unified Knowledge Based Economy Hybrid Forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 107–123.
3. Bergek, A., Norrman, C., 2008, Incubator best practice: A framework, Journal of Technovation, (28), 1-2, 20-28, Linköping University Electronic Press.
4. BPS-Indonesia Statistics (2021). Statistik Karakteristik Usaha 2021
5. Gozali, L., Masrom, M., Haron, HN, & Zagloel, TYM (2015). Critical Success Factors of Successful E-Business Incubators Framework in Indonesian Public Universities.
6. Grimaldi, R., and Grandi, A. (2005). Business Incubators and New Venture Creation: An Assessment of Incubating Models. Technovation, 25(2), 111-121.
7. Hackett, S.M. and Dilts, D.M. (2004a), “A real options-driven theory of business incubation”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 29 No. 1, p. 43.
8. Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2016). Strategic management: Concepts and cases: Competitiveness and globalization. Cengage Learning.
9. Lofsten, H. & Lindelof, P. (2002) Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms – academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31, 859-876
10. Manan, A.A.B.A., Yunos, M.G.B.M., 2011. Technology Business Incubators – A Smart Partnership. International Workshop on Technology Business Incubators in India, India 1- 20
11. Ozdemir, O. C., and Sehitoglu, Y. (2013). Assessing the Impacts of Technology Business Incubators: A Framework for Technology Development Centers in Turkey. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 282–291s
12. Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., and Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a New Generation Incubation Model: The Accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13–24.
13. Rice, Mark P. and Matthews, Jana B. (1995) Growing New Ventures, Creating New Jobs: Principles and Practices of Business Incubation, Quorum Books
14. Rothaermel, Frank T., 2019, Strategic Management, Fourth Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Smilor, R.W., Gill Jr. M.D., 1986. The New Business Incubator: Linking Talent, Technology, Capital, and Know How. Lexington: Lexington Books
16. Verman, S., 2004. Success Factors for Business Incubators: An Empirical Study of Canadian Business Incubators. Eric Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario
17. Wandebori, H., (2019), Manajemen Strategi   Dalam   Perspektif Indonesia, Bandung, INA: ITB Press.