Abstract :

Research based on the conditions of the COVID -19 pandemic and government policies in reducing unemployment through vocational training. However, the vocational training program at the Ministry of Manpower during the COVID -19 pandemic period in 2021 did not have a significant impact. This study aims to evaluate the ministry of workforce’s vocational training program during the COVID -19 pandemic in 2021. The research was conducted through a qualitative approach using the CIPP guidance theory. Data collection methods using observation and unstructured and semi-structured interviews, documents, and literature studies. The research uses data analysis techniques with three stages, in the form of data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion and verification. The results of the study concluded that the vocational training program at the Ministry of Manpower had not been successful in terms of input, process, and product aspects. From the input aspect, the vocational training program’s resources are insufficient. From the process aspect, there are still constraints on the realization of the training, supervision, and instructor skills. Meanwhile, from the product aspect, it cannot be ensured that the participants will be placed after training.

---

Keywords :

CIPP, Evaluation, Program evaluation, VET, Vocational training.

---

References :

1. Avis, J. (2018). Socio-technical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution and its implications for vocational education and training: a literature review. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 70(3), 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2018.1498907

2. (2020). Berita Resmi Statistik :Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Agustus 2020. www.bps.go.id.
3. (2021). Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Agustus 2021. https://www.bps.go.id/
4. (2021). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia Triwulan IV-2020. www.bps.go.id , 13, 12.
5. Clark, & cresswell. (2014). Qualitative Research Designs: Recognizing The Overall Plan For A Study. Exceptional Children.
6. Cresswell, J., & Cresswell, D. (2018). Qualitative Methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 36–47.
7. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Standards of Validation and Evaluation (Perspectives). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, 244–255.
8. Daniel L. Stufflebeam, & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications (Second ed). Jossey-Bass.
9. Darmawan, I. A., Budiyanta, N. E., Aribowo, D., Fatkhurokhman, M., Hamid, M. A., Guntara, Y., & Nurhaji, S. (2020). Electricity course on vocational training centers: A contribution to unemployment management. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1456(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012048
10. Dirjen Binalavotas. (2021). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pembinaan Pelatihan Vokasi dan Produktivitas Nomor 2/2887/LP.03.02/XII/2021 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penyelenggaraan Pelatihan Berbasis Kompetensi Tahun Anggaran 2022.
11. Dirjen Binalavotas. (2021). Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Pembinaan Pelatihan Vokasi dan Produktivitas.
12. Ernawati, Y., & Suyantiningsih. (2020). Studi Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Komputer di Balai Latihan Kerja Kabupaten Bantul. Epistema, 1(1).
13. Fadilah, E. N., & Rosdiana, W. (2015). Evaluasi Pelatihan Isntitusional pada Sub Kejuruan Listrik Industri di Unit Pelaksana Teknis (UPT) Pelatihan Kerja Mojokerto. Publika.
14. Istiyani, N. M., & Utsman, U. (2020). Evaluasi Program Model CIPP Pada Pelatihan Menjahit Di LKP Kartika Bawen. Learning Community: Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, 3(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.19184/jlc.v3i2.16810
15. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan. (2020). Laporan Kinerja Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Tahun 2020. https://kemnaker.go.id/
16. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan. (2021). Laporan Kinerja Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Tahun 2021. https://kemnaker.go.id/
17. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2021 Tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Tahun 2020-2024.
18. Miles, & Huberman. (2014). Our View of Qualitative Data Analysis. In Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 24–34). SAGE Publications.
19. Müller, A. (2016). The digital nomad: Buzzword or research category? Transnational Social Review, 6(3), 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2016.1229930
20. Olga, H. (2020). In search of a digital nomad: defining the phenomenon. Information Technology and Tourism, 22(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-020-00177-z
21. Ridwan, I., & Suryono, Y. (2015). Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Vokasi di Sanggar Kegiatan Belajar Ujung Pandang Kota Makassar. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jppm
22. Saputra, H., & Salma, N. (2020). Dampak PSBB dan PSBB Transisi di DKI Jakarta dalam Pengendalian COVID-19. Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia, 16(3), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.30597/mkmi.v16i3.11042
23. Sari, H., Idris, U., & Novalina, A. (2020). Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Berbasis Kompetensi Bagi Calon Tenaga Kerja Di Unit Pelaksanaan Teknis Dinas Balai Latihan Kerja Pengembangan Produktifitas Dan Keterampilan Transmigrasi Dinas Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 25(02), 26–41.
24. Setianingrum, A. (2016). Implementasi Model Evaluasi CIPP Pada Pelaksanaan Program Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Di BPTT Darman Prasetyo Yogyakarta. In https://eprints.uny.ac.id/. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
25. Shah, A. (2020). Policy, Program and Project Evaluation: A Toolkit for Economic Analysis in a Changing World.
26. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, And Applications (Second Edition). Wiley publishes. http://booksupport.wiley.com.
27. Wahyuningsih, T., Darmawan, I. A., & Hamid, M. A. (2021). Evaluation of Electrical Installation Training Conducted by the Employment Training Center of Pandeglang Regency, Banten, Indonesia. JPPM (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat), 8(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.21831/jppm.v8i2.42116
28. Woodcock, J., & Graham, M. (2020). The Gig Economy A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press