Abstract :

To be able to participate in the COP26 commitment to work together to make clean and sustainable solutions, making clean power is the most affordable and reliable option for Indonesia to meet its power needs efficiently by 2030. The purpose of this research is to create a prioritization of prospective renewable energy projects from the point of view of a service company as an oil and gas company’s contractor. These include Indonesia’s prospective projects, which are geothermal or carbon capture and utilization, and decarbonization or reduction emission from existing services. This research also decides criteria that important for service company in providing renewable energy. A literature study, interviews with key decisionmakers in the company, questionnaires to company experts, and a questionnaire to practitioners in the industry were done to determine the criteria and prioritization technique. Four criteria of governance, marketing and sales, financial and project management were found to support the prioritization process using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Among the nine sub-criteria, the sub-criteria with the highest global weights are profitability, cashflow, and service quality assurance.

---

Keywords :

Analytic hierarchy process, Business Strategy, Decision making, Renewable Energy

---

References :

1. Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2020, Indonesia Energy Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map Update. Manila: Asian Development Bank
2. Agung, Boyke P. I., 2016, Prioritization Model for Project Portfolio Management, Case Study: PT Pertamina Hulu Energi ONWJ, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
3. BPPT Indonesia., 2020, Outlook Energi Indonesia 2020: Dampak Pandemi COVID-19 terhadap Sektor Energi di Indonesia., ISBN 978-602-1328-14-9.
4. De Montis, A., De Toro, P., Droste-Franke, B., Omann, I., and Stagl, S., 2004, Assessing the Quality of Different MCDA Methods. Alternatives for Environmental Valuation: 99-184.
5. Emerson, P., 2013, The Original Borda Count and Partial Voting, Journal of Social Choice Welfare, 40: 353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0603-9
6. Gavade, R. K., 2014, Multi-Criteria Decision Making: An Overview of Different Selection problems and methods. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 5 (4), 2014, 5643-5646, ISSN: 0975-9646.
7. Haas, R., & Meixner, O., 2005, An Illustrated Guide to Analytic Hierarchy Process. Vienna, Austria: University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences.
8. IESR, 2019. Indonesia Clean Energy Outlook: Tracking Progress and Review of Clean Energy Development in Indonesia. Jakarta: Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR)
9. , 2021, Indonesia Energy Transition Outlook 2021: Tracking Progress of Energy Transition in Indonesia, Jakarta: Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR)
10. , 2021, Indonesia Energy Transition Outlook 2022: Tracking Progress of Energy Transition in Indonesia: Aiming for Net-Zero Emissions by 2050, Jakarta: Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR)
11. IRENA, 2017, Renewable Energy Prospects: Indonesia, a Remap analysis., International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Abu Dhabi.
12. Maries, O., and Zauels, N., 2018, Expert perceptions on renewable energy implementation in ASEAN: An angle from cross-sector collaborations., Malmo University.
13. Saaty, T. L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
14. Saaty, T.L., 1996, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Multicriteria Decision Making – Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. Pittsburgh (PA): RWS Publications.
15. Saaty, T.L., 1982, The Logic of Priorities: Applications in Business, Energy, Health, and Transportation. Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V.
16. Saaty, T. L., 2005, Theory and Applications of The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
17. Saaty, T. L., 2009, Extending the Measurement of Tangibles to Intangibles, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, (8)1, 7 –27, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1483438
18. SBM ITB Jakarta, 2019, Course Material: Decision Analysis Using SMART. Jakarta: SBM ITB
19. Teber, A., and Karakas, A., 2019, Preferability Ranking of Alternative Energy Resources Technology Programs in Turkey of using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. Turkey: Bayburt University and Gebze Technical University.
20. Vargas, L.G., 1990, An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications. European Journal of Operational Research, (48), 2–8
21. Vargas, R. V., 2010, Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Select and Prioritize Projects in A Portfolio. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2010—North America, Washington, DC. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
22. Velazquez, M., and Hester, P. T., 2013, An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision- Making Method, International Journal of Operations Research Vol. 10, No. 2, 56- 66 (2013).
23. Weber, K., 1993, Mehrkriterielle Entscheidungen. München/Wien: Oldenbourg Verlag. Wibisono, D., and Nikodemus. W. K., 2013, Panduan Penyusunan Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.
24. Widagdo, A.T. 2020, Multi Criteria Decision Making Model on Investment Portfolio Prioritization in Krakatau Steel (PERSERO) Tbk: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
25. Yudha, S.W., and Tjahjino, B., and Kolios, A., A PESTLE Policy Mapping and Stakeholder Analysis of Indonesia’s Fossil Fuel Energy Industry., 2018, Energies Journal. doi:10.3390/en11051272