Abstract :

WIKA WG KSO is a joint company between PT. WIKA and PT. WEGE, which is engaged in the construction sector, is a temporary limited liability company that was deliberately built to complete the TNI-AD RUMDIS project which is located in 36 areas in Indonesia. One of the project areas is in Ciracas, East Jakarta, which was chosen by the author as the research subject. The location of the research project is in a residential area, so the construction process is carried out in the same place as the community’s activity and mobility area, which in turn raises several issues and criticisms.

The purpose of this research is to analyze the problem solving conducted by PT. WIKA WG KSO, the process taken, until the results obtained from solving problems that have been carried out, as well as to identify alternative methods that can be carried out by PT. WIKA WG KSO to get the best results. The author proposes the interactive negotiation method as a recommendation to achieve a win-win solution that is fair for both parties.

Based on the research that has been done, the authors conclude that there are several methods of integrative negotiation that can be carried out by PT. WIKA WG KSO to achieve a fair and profitable end result for PT. WIKA WG KSO and local residents affected by the TNI-AD RUMDIS development project.

---

Keywords :

12950 Jakarta, chool of Business and Management, Indonesia, Institut Teknologi Bandung

---

References :

1. Alfredson, T. & Cungu, A. (2008). Negotiation Theory and Practice: A Review of Literature. Rome: EasyPOL.
2. Aquino, K., Becker, T. E. (2005). Lying in negotiations: How individual and situational factors Influence the use of neutralization strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 661-679.
3. Bazerman, M.H. (2005). Negotiation, decision making and conflict management.
4. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
5. Bruce, C. (1995). Supervising literature reviews. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
6. Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
7. Craver, C.B. (2003). The negotiation process. Washington DC: The George Washington University Law School David Lax and James Sebenius in The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain, 1986.
8. Fisher, R. & Ury, W. (1986). Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Publishing Group
9. Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Golembiewski, R., & McConkie, M. (1988). The Centrality of Interpersonal Trust in Group Process. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group process. New York: Wiley.
11. Gorman, G.E. & Clayton, P. (2005). Qualitative research for the information professional (2nd ed.). London: Facet.
12. Hocker, J.I. & Wilmot, W.W. (1985). Interpersonal conflict dubuque. Iowa: Wmc. Brown Publisher
13. Kabir, S.M.S. (2016). Basic guidelines for research: an introductory approach for all disciplines. Bangladesh: Bookzone Publication
14. Kissinger, H.A., 1969. Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. W.W. Norton, New York, USA.
15. Schelling, T. C., 1960. The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
16. Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research methodology: methods and techniques (second revised edition). Jaipur: New Age International
17. Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd edition). New Delhi: SAGE Publications
18. Lammers, W. J, & Badia, P. (2005). Fundamentals of behavioral research. California: Wadsworth.
19. Lewicki, R.J., Saunders, D.M., & Minton, J. (1999). Negotiation (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
20. Lewicki R., Barry B., & Saunders D. (2007) Essentials of Negotiation. 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill
21. Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. California: Sage Publications.
22. McNamara, Carter, PhD. (1999). General Guidelines for Conducting Interviews, Minnesota.
23. Mathers, N., Fox, N.J, & Hunn, A. (2000). Research approaches in primary care. Manchester: Radcliffe Medical Press.
24. Menkel-Meadow, C. Toward another view of legal negotiation: The structure of problem solving. Los Angeles: UCLA Law
25. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. O’Gorman, K. & MacIntosh, R. (2015). Research methods for business & management (2nd edition). Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers Limited.
27. Olekalns, M., Kulik, C. T., & Chew, L. (2014). Sweet little lies; Social context and the use of deception In negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 13-26.
28. Pandey, P. & Pandey, M.M. (2015). Research methodology: tools and techniques. Romania: Bridge Center.
29. Pruitt, D.G. & Carnevale, P.J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. United Kingdom: Open University Press.
30. Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. SAGE Publications.
31. Ravitch, S.M., & Riggan, M. (2016). How conceptual frameworks guide research (2nd ed.). CA: Sage.
32. Robbins, S.P. (2005) Organizational behavior (11th ed.) New Jersey: Pearson Education.
33. Setiawan, N. S., Hakim, A. K. (2022). Integrative Negotiation Strategy to Fulfill Consumer Rights at PT. Ebad Alrahman Tourism Juanda Sidoarjo. Journal of Islamic Management and Pilgrimage, 2(1), 1-17.
34. Stoshikj M & Greguš M. (2014). NSSs as a Solution to Negotiation Challenges in Enterprise Environment. 6th International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS-2014), September 10-12
35. Terri, K. (2011). The essentials of job negotiation: proven strategies for getting what you want. Connecticut: Praeger.
36. Walton, R.E., & McKersie, R.B. (1991). A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA.
37. Yamauchi, L. A., Lau-Smith, J. A., & Luning, R. J. I. (2008). Family involvement in a Hawaiian language immersion program. School Community Journal, 18(1), 39–60.