Abstract :

Purpose: Acute right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain is a common presenting symptom in emergency departments and outpatient medical practices, and is most commonly attributable to biliary and hepatic pathology. The main objective of the study is to systematically analyse the comparison of diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in right upper quadrant pain.

Material and methods: This study was conducted using a systematic search on Google scholar, Pubmed and Web of science published until 20^th June 2020. The cited references of retrieved articles and previous reviews were also manually checked to identify any additional eligible studies with indexed search terms for cholecystitis, US, cholescintigraphy, CT, and MR imaging.

Results: After excluding duplicates and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, we obtained 30 articles with full-texts which were read for further evaluation, where another 60 were excluded as irrelevant. Overall, we included 30 articles that directly match on the inclusion criteria.

Conclusion: It is concluded that RUQ pain were not as good as sensitivities reported in prior studies. CT was statistically significantly better for the diagnosis of RUQ pain than US, most likely because of an unclear clinical picture, the patient population, and a high proportion of poor-quality US examinations. However, US is still our first test of choice if RUQ pain is suspected clinically, whereas CT is performed when the clinical picture is unclear.

---

Keywords :

Accuracy, CT scan, Diagnostic, Pain

---

References :

1. Menu Y, Vuillerme MP. Non-traumatic abdominal emergencies: imaging and intervention in acute biliary conditions. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2397–2406
2. Kiewiet JJ, Leeuwenburgh MM, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis. Radiology 2012; 264:708–720
3. Kielar AZ, Sirlin CB, Ash R, et al. Scientific paper abstracts presented at the society of abdominal radiology 2016 annual scientific meeting and educational course march 13–18, 2016, Waikoloa, Hawaii. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:1670–1694
4. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al.; Tokyo Guidelines Revision Committee. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20:35–46
5. Halpin V, Gupta A. Acute cholecystitis. BMJ Clin Evid 2011; 2011:0411
6. Ralls PW, Colletti PM, Lapin SA, et al. Real-time sonography in suspected acute cholecystitis: prospective evaluation of primary and secondary signs. Radiology 1985; 155:767–771
7. Soyer P, Hoeffel C, Dohan A, et al. Acute cholecystitis: quantitative and qualitative evaluation with 64-section helical CT. Acta Radiol 2013; 54:477–486
8. Fidler J, Paulson EK, Layfield L. CT evaluation of acute cholecystitis: findings and usefulness in diagnosis. AJR 1996; 166:1085–1088
9. Pinto A, Reginelli A, Cagini L, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute calculous cholecystitis: review of the literature. Crit Ultrasound J 2013; 5(suppl 1): S11.
10. Sezer TO, Gulece B, Zalluhoglu N et al (2012) Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in appendicitis. Adv Clin Exp Med 21:633–636
11. Mallin M, Craven P, Ockerse P et al (2015) Diagnosis of appendicitis by bedside ultrasound in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 33:430–432
12. Carroll PJ, Gibson D, El-Faedy O et al (2013) Surgeon-performed ultrasound at the bedside for the detection of appendicitis and gallstones: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 205:102–108
13. Charalel RA, Jeffrey RB, Shin LK. Complicated cholecystitis: the complementary roles of sonography and computed tomography. Ultrasound Q2011; 27:161–170
14. van Randen, A., Laméris, W., van Es, H. W., van Heesewijk, H. P., van Ramshorst, B., Ten Hove, W., Bouma, W. H., van Leeuwen, M. S., van Keulen, E. M., Bossuyt, P. M., Stoker, J., Boermeester, M. A., & OPTIMA Study Group (2011). A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. European radiology, 21(7), 1535–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2087-5
15. Charalel RA, Jeffrey RB, Shin LK. Complicated cholecystitis: the complementary roles of sonography and computed tomography. Ultrasound Q. 2011 Sep;27(3):161-70. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31822a33e8. PMID: 21873853.
16. Kiewiet JJ, Leeuwenburgh MM, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis. Radiology. 2012 Sep;264(3):708-20. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111561. Epub 2012 Jul 12. PMID: 22798223.
17. Wertz, J. R., Lopez, J. M., Olson, D., & Thompson, W. M. (2018). Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and CT in Evaluating Acute Cholecystitis.  American journal of roentgenology, 211(2), W92–W97. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18884
18. Tan, E.S., Friesen, J.  and Friesen,    (2018) Acute  Cholecysti-tis: Computed   Tomography   (CT)   versus   Ultrasound  (US). Open  Journal  of  Radiol-ogy, 8, 131-139. (14) (PDF) Acute Cholecystitis: Computed Tomography (CT) versus Ultrasound (US).
19. MARCUCCI, V., YEE, S., CASTILLO, R., FAKHOURY, E., ZUBERI, J.. A Retrospective Comparison Study of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography Scan in Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in the Pediatric Population. Journal of Current Surgery, North America, 10, aug. 2020. Available at: <https://www.currentsurgery.org/index.php/jcs/article/view/404>. Date accessed: 23 Oct. 2020

20. Khan, M., & Abu-Zidan, F. M. (2020). Point-of-care ultrasound for the acute abdomen in the primary health care. Turkish journal of emergency medicine, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4103/2452-2473.276384
21. Mengel-Jørgensen T, Jensen MB. Variation in the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice in various European countries. Results of a survey among experts. Eur J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;22(4):274-277. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2016.1211105. Epub 2016 Aug 3. PMID: 27487159.

22. Díaz PO, Berty GH. The role of ultrasound in assessing acute abdominal pain. Revista Cubana de Cirugía. 2019;58(1):76-90.