Abstract :

Improving efficiency of a clinical laboratory service should be a first priority in healthcare development of any country. It plays a significant role as it facilitates diagnosing and treating diseases and finally to discharge the patients faster. Therefore, the reliability and the accuracy of a clinical laboratory should be guaranteed through a sound sample management. The aim of this study was to improve the process and practices of sample management at a sample receiving counter of a selected government clinical laboratory in Sri Lanka.

The study was an institution based interventional project. The research adopted mixed methods including a desk review, a checklist, focus group discussions and a staff satisfaction survey which was conducted among Medical Laboratory Technologists.  Proportions, percentages and means were calculated for quantitative data and narrative analysis was done for the analysis of qualitative data.

The results indicated that the incidences of missing samples and request forms and sample handling time have been significantly reduced at post intervention. Performance of the routine counter activities including proper documentation, updating the notice boards, monitoring temperatures of sample storing refrigerators and consideration of rejection criteria in accepting the samples were significantly improved after the intervention. Staff satisfaction on overall sample handling process and practices was significantly improved after the intervention except the current practice of sample data management and facility availability to carry out duties. The study recommends modifying the counter layout with adequate expansion. It also recognized the necessity of implementing a Laboratory Information Management System for whole laboratory operation.

---

Keywords :

Clinical laboratory, Interventions, Medical Laboratory Technologists, Sample management., Sample receiving counter

---

References :

1. Holland NT, Smith MT, Eskenazi B, Bastaki M. Biological sample collection and processing for molecular epidemiological studies. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research. 2003 Jun 1;543(3):217-34.
2. World Health Organization. Laboratory quality management system: handbook. World Health Organization; 2011.
3. Lippi G, Guidi GC. Risk management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing.
4. Guder WG. Pre-analytical factors and their influence on analytical quality specifications. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 1999 Jan 1;59(7):545-9.
5. Sandbank S, Klein D, Westreich M, Shalom A. The loss of pathological specimens: incidence and causes. Dermatologic surgery. 2010 Jul;36(7):1084-6. [6] Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Pelloso M, Chiozza ML. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the pre-analytical phase. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2015 May 1;53(6):943-8.
6. Shalom A, Westreich M, Sandbank S. An intervention study to reduce the loss of pathology specimens. The Israel Medical Association Journal: IMAJ. 2013 Jul 1;15(7):356-8.
7. Avcı E, Çeken N, Kangal Z, Demir S, Emekli Dİ, Zorbozan N. Approach to pre-analytical errors in a public health laboratory. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry. 2017 Feb 1;42(1):59-63.
8. Antonacci G, Lennox L, Barlow J, Evans L, Reed J. Process mapping in healthcare: a systematic review. BMC health services research. 2021 Dec;21(1):1-5.
9. Rusjan B, Kiauta M. Improving healthcare through process standardization: a general hospital case study. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2019 Mar 11.
10. Bargaje C. Good documentation practice in clinical research. Perspectives in clinical research. 2011 Apr;2(2):59.
11. Gunnur Dikmen Z, Pinar A, Akbiyik F. Specimen rejection in laboratory medicine: Necessary for patient safety?. Biochemia Medica. 2015 Oct 15;25(3):37785.
12. Hwang, Y., Kettinger, W. J., & Mun, Y. Y. (2013). A study on the motivational aspects of information management practice. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 177-184.
13. Fisher F, Pankowski ML. Mandatory continuing education for clinical laboratory personnel. Journal of continuing Education in the Health Professions. 1992;12(4):225-34.

1. Boyar K, Pham A, Swantek S, Ward G, Herman G. Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS). InCannabis Laboratory Fundamentals 2021 (pp. 131-151). Springer, Cham.