Abstract :

The equality of covariance matrices is an essential assumption in means and discriminant analyses for high-dimensional data. The performance of tests for covariance matrices may vary substantially depending on the covariance structure, so using inappropriate methods to verify the assumption will result in worse performance. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the performance of three tests for two-sample high-dimensional covariance matrices: Schott’s (2007), Srivastava and Yanagihara’s (2010), and Li and Chen’s (2012) under various covariance structures. A simulation study was conducted when the covariance structures were spherical, compound symmetric, block-diagonal, and first-order autoregressive with homogenous variances. The results show that Li and Chen’s test outperforms the others with a sample size of at least 10 under particular covariance structures. When the number of variables is increased with a fixed sample size, Li and Chen’s test still performs well, whereas Schott’s performance deteriorates. Some recommendations for selecting appropriate tests are also provided in this paper.

---

Keywords :

Covariance matrix structure, Equality of covariance matrices, High dimensional data, Test for covariance matrices, Two-Sample Tests

---

References :

1. Alon, U. et al., “Broad Patterns of Gene Expression Revealed by Clustering Analysis of Tumor and Normal Colon Tissues Probed by Oligonucleotide Arrays”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.  96(12), pp. 6745-6750, 1999.
2. Hotelling, H., “The economics of exhaustible resources”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 39(2), pp. 137-175, 1931.
3. Schott, J.R., “A test for the equality of covariance matrices when the dimension is large relative to the sample sizes”, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 51(12), pp. 6535-6542, 2007.
4. Srivastava, M.S., and Yanagihara, H., “Testing the equality of several covariance matrices with fewer observations than the dimension”, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, vol. 101(6), pp. 1319-1329, 2010.
5. Li, J., and Chen, S.X., “Two sample tests for high-dimensional covariance matrices”, The Annals of Statistics, vol. 40(2), pp. 908-940, 2012.
6. Srivastava, M.S., Yanagihara, H., and Kubokawa, T., “Tests for covariance matrices in high dimension with less sample size”, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, vol. 130, pp. 289-309, 2014.
7. Cai, T., Liu, W., and Xia, Y., “Two-sample covariance matrix testing and support recovery in high-dimensional and sparse settings”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 108(501), pp. 265-277, 2013.
8. Bradley, J.V., “Robustness?,”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol. 31(2), pp. 144-152, 1978.