Abstract :

Research on thinking processes in learning has developed across theoretical traditions, yet related constructs are often examined separately. This fragmentation makes it difficult to develop an integrated understanding of how learners direct attention, process knowledge, draw inferences, and reflect on and regulate their thinking. This study synthesizes the literature on thinking processes in learning and develops an integrative conceptual framework linking core thinking processes with supporting conditions and developmental and social contexts. A systematic literature review using PRISMA-based selection procedures examined Scopus-indexed articles published between 2021 and 2026. Of 288 identified articles, 11 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed through data extraction, thematic analysis, and narrative synthesis. The synthesis identifies three core processes: attentional regulation, knowledge processing and inference, and reflection and control. These processes operate within supporting conditions, including prior knowledge, task demands, self-efficacy, learning experiences, language, and social support, and are shaped by developmental and social contexts. The findings distinguish core thinking processes from constructs that function as supporting conditions. The proposed framework conceptualizes thinking as a dynamic system of interrelated processes rather than a fixed sequence of stages. It provides a conceptual basis for developing operational indicators and subsequent empirical validation.

---

Keywords :

integrative synthesis, Piaget, systematic literature review, thinking processes, Thorndike, Vygotsky

---

References :

1. Akbari, M., Mokarami, , Cousins, R., Taghanaki, C. R., Kaveh, M. H., & Jahangiri, M. (2024). Development and validation of a resilience skills questionnaire for health sector professionals based on social cognitive theory. BioMed Research International, 2024, Article 5660620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5660620
2. Bigelow, F. , Clark, G. M., Lum, J. A. G., & Enticott, P. G. (2021). The mediating effect of language on the development of cognitive and affective theory of mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 209, Article 105158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105158
3. Chong, S. , Lin, T. J., & Chen, Y. (2022). A methodological review of systematic literature reviews in higher education: Heterogeneity and homogeneity. Educational Research Review, 35, Article 100426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100426
4. Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G. C., Greiff, S., Makris, N., Panaoura, , & Kazi, S. (2022). Changing priorities in the development of cognitive competence and school learning: A general theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 954971. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954971
5. Hačatrjana, , & Namsone, D. (2024). Breaking down the concept of students’ thinking and reasoning skills for implementation in the classroom. Journal of Intelligence, 12(11), Article 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12110109
6. Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Sanchez-Stockhammer, C., & Schneider, S. (2023). Development and validation of a theory-based questionnaire to measure different types of cognitive Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09738-0
7. Maeda, , Caskurlu, S., Kenney, R. H., Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2022). Moving qualitative synthesis research forward in education: A methodological systematic review. Educational Research Review, 35, Article 100424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100424
8. Maric, D., Fore, G. A., Nyarko, S. C., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2023). Measurement in STEM education research: A systematic literature review of trends in the psychometric evidence of scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00430-x
9. Mohammed, S. , & Kinyó, L. (2022). The cross-cultural validation of the technology-enhanced social constructivist learning environment questionnaire in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00199-7
10. Paul, J., Khatri, , & Kaur Duggal, H. (2024). Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, why and how? Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197700
11. Rila, R. P. P., & Aziz, T. A. (2022). Kajian reflektif teori Thorndike dalam konteks representasi matematis berdasarkan ideologi utilitarian. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 2(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v2i1.129
12. Rueda, R. (2024). Developing the attentive brain: Contribution of cognitive neuroscience to a theory of attentional development. Human Development, 68(5–6), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1159/000540464
13. Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1899–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3
14. Stoltz, , Weger, U., & Veiga, M. da. (2024). Consciousness and education: Contributions by Piaget, Vygotsky and Steiner. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1411415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411415
15. Sulla, F., Monacis, D., & Limone, P. (2023). A systematic review of the role of teachers’ support in promoting socially shared regulatory strategies for Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1208012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208012
16. Sweller, J. (2023). The development of cognitive load theory: Replication crises and incorporation of other theories can lead to theory expansion. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09817-2
17. Tchombe, M. S. (2023). Resilient cultural practices for cognitive development during childhood within learning pathways with support from mediated mutual reciprocal theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 994156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.994156
18. Theobald, M., Kerner auch Koerner, J., Breitwieser, J., Buhr, L., Karbach, J., Könen, T., Nobbe, L., Reinelt, T., Schaaf, M., Schmiedek, F., Wieland, L. , & Blume, F. (2026). Executive functions, metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: What are we talking about? A review and introduction of the EMERGE model. Educational Psychology Review, 38, Article 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10157-0
19. Wang, Q., & Wang, J. (2024). A study of student leadership development in the integration of civic and psychological education based on social cognitive theory. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01305
20. Yudianto, E., Firmansyah, F. , & Zulnaidi, H. (2026a). How geometry task management shapes students’ spatial structuring: Evidence from tangram-based Pythagorean problem solving. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 17(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v17i2.30955
21. Yudianto, E., Firmansyah, F. , & Zulnaidi, H. (2026b). Mathematical anticipation and representational coordination within van Hiele levels: Evidence from pre-service teachers learning linear equations. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.70069
22. Zangrilli, A., Conneely, M., McCabe, R., Catalfio, F., & Priebe, S. (2022). Categorizing what patients with psychosis say in clinical interactions: The development of a framework informed by theory of mind, metacognition and cognitive behavioral theory. Journal of Mental Health, 31(5), 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.1875408 Taylor & Francis Online
23. Zhang, H. (2024). A study of leadership development for psychoeducationally integrated students based on social cognitive theory. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01528 ResearchGate
24. Zohrabi Alaee, , & Zwickl, B. M. (2025). Exploring subfield interest development in undergraduate physics students through social cognitive career theory. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(2), Article 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/cgcb-4k6z