Seanova (Sea Organic Value Innovation) As a Resource Recovery Innovation for Enabling Responsible Food Production: A Case Study in PLN Indonesia Power UBP Adipala

Vol 9 No 9 (2026): Volume 09 Issue 09 September 2026

Article Date Published : 15 September 2026 | Page No.: 5002-5009 | Google Scholar | Crossref doi for this article

Abstract :

Irresponsible food production generates organic waste and greenhouse gas emissions that damage the environment, yet resources with potential value are often left unused, particularly Sea organic residue produced from industrial cooling water operations. Research specifically examining how such Sea organic waste can be converted into recovered resources within a responsible food production framework remains limited. This study aims to analyze the mechanism of Seanova, an innovation that transforms Sea organic resources into recovered resources supporting a more responsible food production system. A qualitative method with a case study approach was employed, using secondary data from internal company reports and relevant literature, analyzed descriptively. The results show that Sea biota waste generated from the pump system reached an average of 312 kilograms per year, with a potential emission reduction of 435.7 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent per year when properly managed. Monitoring data recorded a total residue of 218 kilograms over an eight-month period. Fish products were found to contribute the highest food loss and waste percentage among animal-based commodities in the region. The processed Sea residue was found to contain minerals suitable as poultry feed ingredients. These findings indicate that Seanova contributes to waste reduction, resource value recovery, and the strengthening of a more sustainable local food production system.

Keywords :

Food Loss and Waste, Poultry Feed, Resource Recovery, Sea Organic Residue., Seanova

References :

  1. Abasubong, K. P., Amin, A. B., Uwem, G. U., & Desouky, H. E. (2025). A review of fish waste and byproducts in poultry production: effects on growth, egg quality, carcass traits, and broader knowledge beyond physiological response. Animal Advances, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.48130/animadv-0025-0027
  2. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1996). Handbook of qualitative research. Journal of Leisure Research, 28(2), 132. https://doi.org/10.2307/3121684
  3. Ericksen, P. J. (2008). Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.002
  4. Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
  5. (2019). Technical Platform on the Measurement and Reduction of Food Loss and Waste.
  6. Handoyo, M. A. P., & Asri, N. P. (2023). Study on food loss and food waste: Conditions, impact and solutions. AGRITEPA: Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Pertanian, 10(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.37676/agritepa.v10i2.4579
  7. Jahan, N., Tahmid, M., Shoronika, A. Z., Fariha, A., Roy, H., Pervez, M. N., … & Islam, M. S. (2022). A comprehensive review on the sustainable treatment of textile wastewater: zero liquid discharge and resource recovery perspectives. Sustainability, 14(22), 15398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215398
  8. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  9. Love, D. C., Asche, F., Fry, J., Nguyen, L., Gephart, J., Garlock, T. M., … & Neff, R. (2023). Aquatic food loss and waste rate in the United States is half of earlier estimates. Nature Food, 4(12), 1058-1069. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00881-z
  10. Mirabella, N., Castellani, V., & Sala, S. (2014). Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.051
  11. Mirmanto, H. (2016). Analisis performa Circulating Water Pump pada industri pembangkitan (studi kasus PLTU Bolok NTT). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains dan Teknologi Terapan.
  12. Palupi, N. W. I., Ummah, S. R., & Larasati, P. (2025). Konsep dan praktik metode kualitatif untuk penelitian sosial. RISOMA: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan, 3(4), 188-198. https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i4.860
  13. Pamungkas, A., Nepa, J. M., Telnoni, S. P., Zebua, C. K. N., Deko, M. K., Widu, A. A., Sari, A. P., & Menoh, Y. R. (2025). Bunga rampai manajemen budidaya ternak unggas: Praktik terbaik untuk produktivitas dan keberlanjutan. Malang: PT Penerbit Riset Sadewa.
  14. Patriana, R. A., Sidik, H., & Rakhmadi, R. (2025). Implementasi SDGs 12.3 (food loss and waste) oleh Singapura tahun 2015-2019. Jurnal Global Lokal, 2(3), 1-16.
  15. Pratama, H., Maharani, A., Citra, C., Binsanno, M. M., Arkhami, F. Y., Azhari, T. A., … & Helmi, A. (2025). Upaya pemenuhan kebutuhan mineral hewan ternak ruminansia melalui pelatihan pembuatan mineral blok di Desa Girimulyo, Kecamatan Jatipurno, Wonogiri. Jurnal Pusat Inovasi Masyarakat, 7(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpim.7.1.34-46
  16. Salam, A., Hartini., Husni., & Safitri, O. (2025). Pemberdayaan kelompok ternak Poto melalui pakan fermentasi berbasis green economy. Jurnal Abdi Panca Marga, 6(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.51747/abdiPancaMarga.v6n1.614
  17. Samson, E., Unitly, A. J. A., Watuguly, T. W., Kaihena, M., Nindatu, M., Moniharapon, M., … & Silahooy, V. B. (2024). Etnomedisin biota laut. CV. Tohar Media Makassar.
  18. Sapsuha, Y., Setiyowati, P. A. I., Yulianto, R., Bira, G. F., Jatnika, A. R., & Utami, S. (2024). Nutrisi pakan ternak. Kamiya Jaya Aquatic.
  19. Shirazi, A., & Mahdi, M. (2023). Resource recovery for sustainable development and circular economy. Journal of Resource Recovery, 1(January-December), e703906. https://doi.org/10.52547/jrr.2303.1011
  20. Sholikhah, A. (2016). Statistik deskriptif dalam penelitian kualitatif. KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 10(2), 342-362. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v10i2.953
  21. Suroso, G. G. A., Aridnato, K., Muhtarudin., & Erwanto (2022). Evaluasi kecukupan nutrisi pada sapi potong di KPT Maju Sejahtera Kecamatan Tanjung Sari Kabupaten Lampung Selatan. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Peternakan, 7(2), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.23960/jrip.2023.7.2.147-155
  22. Wainaina, S., Awasthi, M. K., Sarsaiya, S., Chen, H., Singh, E., Kumar, A., … & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2020). Resource recovery and circular economy from organic solid waste using aerobic and anaerobic digestion technologies. Bioresource Technology, 301, 122778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122778
  23. Widodo, E. (2018). Ilmu nutrisi unggas. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

How to Cite :

Seanova (Sea Organic Value Innovation) As a Resource Recovery Innovation for Enabling Responsible Food Production: A Case Study in PLN Indonesia Power UBP Adipala. Taufik Hidayanto, Jofan NF Sanyoto, Adinda Aulia Nur Afifah, Ayu Nurcahya, 9(9), 5002-5009. Retrieved from https://ijcsrr.org/single-view/?id=27526&pid=27435

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Taufik Hidayanto, Jofan NF Sanyoto, Adinda Aulia Nur Afifah, Ayu Nurcahya,

View

35

Citation

Downloads

Article Details