Abstract :

Variability in phosphate-concentrate chemistry can affect sulfuric acid demand, phosphorus recovery, calcium sulfate formation, and solid–liquid separation during wet-process phosphoric acid (WPA) production. This study presents a retrospective, quality-controlled reanalysis of a historical bench-scale campaign comprising six coded phosphate concentrates (PQH-001 to PQH-006). Each concentrate was represented by one complete WPA bench test; accordingly, comparisons are descriptive rather than inferential. Feed P₂O₅ ranged from 27.59 to 30.55 wt%, whereas the minor-elements ratio (MER = 100 × (Al₂O₃ + Fe₂O₃ + MgO)/P₂O₅) ranged from 7.12 to 16.83%. The surviving records documented 98 wt% sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, and gypsum streams, filtration calculations, and duplicate hydrochloric acid attack tests, but did not preserve several operating variables required for mechanistic attribution. Observed P₂O₅ recovery ranged from 94.68 to 97.99%. The highest-grade feed, PQH-004 (30.55 wt% P₂O₅), showed the lowest recovery (94.68%) and the highest residual P₂O₅ in dry gypsum (1.083 wt%), demonstrating that feed grade alone did not rank performance in this campaign. PQH-005 showed the most favorable observed combination of metrics: 97.99% recovery, 0.405 wt% P₂O₅ in dry gypsum, a filtration index of 185.3 kg h⁻¹ m⁻², and sulfuric-acid use of 2.603 t H₂SO₄/t feed P₂O₅, approximately 1% above the CaO-only stoichiometric benchmark. A stoichiometric QA/QC audit identified the reported PQH-003 acid addition as chemically inconsistent, and its filtration result was also non-defensible because a required dry-cake term was missing. The results support a staged, multi-parameter qualification approach based on feed chemistry, stoichiometric consistency, phosphorus deportment, and filtration behavior, followed by replicated modern bench and pilot validation before industrial scale-up.

---

Keywords :

phosphate concentrate; wet-process phosphoric acid; phosphogypsum; phosphorus recovery; sulfuric acid demand; filtration

---

References :

1. Abdelouahhab, M., Manar, S., & Benhida, R. (2022). Optimization and evaluation of the effect of impurities on phosphoric acid process performance using design of experiments. Results in Engineering, 15, 100501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100501
2. Al-Fariss, T. F., Ozbelge, H. O., Abdel Aleem, F. A., & Abdulrazik, S. M. (1992). Evaluation of Saudi phosphate rocks for wet process phosphoric acid production. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences, 4(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30554-3
3. Becker, P. (1989). Phosphates and phosphoric acid: Raw materials, technology, and economics of the wet process (2nd ed., rev. and expanded). Marcel Dekker.
4. Deng, X., Yin, S., Tang, S., Lv, L., & Zhang, T. (2026). Regulating co-crystalline phosphorus content in wet-process phosphoric acid via synergistic calcium sulfate crystallization and hydration. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2026.02.004
5. Ding, W., Bao, S., Xin, C., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., & Kuang, B. (2025). Research progress on preparation and purification technology of wet-process phosphoric acid from middle-low-grade phosphorus ore. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 44(4), 2274–2284. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2024-0567
6. Dong, W., Sun, N., Deng, X., Chen, Z., Zhang, Y., Chi, R., & Hu, L. (2024). Study on the occurrence state of main components of phosphogypsum dihydrate and its impurity distribution. RSC Advances, 14(31), 22280–22291. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA03273J
7. Fang, K., Xu, L., Yang, M., & Chen, Q. (2023). One-step wet-process phosphoric acid by-product CaSO₄ and its purification. Separation and Purification Technology, 309, 123048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.123048
8. Guan, Q., Wang, Z., Zhou, F., Yu, W., Yin, Z., Zhang, Z., Chi, R., & Zhou, J. (2024). The impurity removal and comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum: A review. Materials, 17(9), 2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092067
9. Huo, X., Guo, L., Liu, R., Tao, C., & Xi, B. (2023a). Revealing mechanism of hemihydrate–dihydrate phosphogypsum transformation and minimizing phosphorus loss in wet process phosphoric acid. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 62(50), 21590–21598. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c03040
10. Huo, X., Guo, L., Liu, R., Tao, C., & Xi, B. (2023b). Role of additives: Modified hemihydrate phosphogypsum morphology and enhanced filtration performance of wet-process phosphoric acid. ACS Omega, 8(49), 47295–47303. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c08259
11. Kruger, A., Focke, W. W., Kwela, Z., & Fowles, R. (2001). Effect of ionic impurities on the crystallization of gypsum in wet-process phosphoric acid. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 40(5), 1364–1369. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie000478b
12. Li, X., Lv, X., & Xiang, L. (2023). Review of the state of impurity occurrences and impurity removal technology in phosphogypsum. Materials, 16(16), 5630. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165630
13. Mu, X., Zhu, G., Li, X., Li, S., Gong, X., Li, H., & Sun, G. (2019). Effects of impurities on CaSO₄ crystallization in the Ca(H₂PO₄)₂–H₂SO₄–H₃PO₄–H₂O system. ACS Omega, 4(7), 12702–12710. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01114
14. Peng, B., Ma, Z., Zhu, Y., & Tang, L. (2022). Release and recovery of fluorine and iodine in the production and concentration of wet-process phosphoric acid from phosphate rock. Minerals Engineering, 188, 107843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107843
15. Peng, Y., Zhu, Z., Braatz, R. D., & Myerson, A. S. (2015). Gypsum crystallization during phosphoric acid production: Modeling and experiments using the mixed-solvent-electrolyte thermodynamic model. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 54(32), 7914–7924. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01763
16. Pereira, A. C. (2026). Phosphorus control in titanium feedstocks for TiO₂ pigment production: A critical review of mineralogical constraints, dephosphorization routes, and rutilization performance. International Journal of Future Engineering Innovations, 3(2), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJFEI.2026.3.2.08-30
17. Ryszko, U., Rusek, P., & Kołodyńska, D. (2023). Quality of phosphate rocks from various deposits used in wet phosphoric acid and P-fertilizer production. Materials, 16(2), 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020793
18. Shan, G., Yang, X., Huo, X., Ma, K., Abrar, L., Li, X., Yao, L., Zhao, Y., Chi, R., Long, B., Li, W., & Zhang, J. (2026). Enhanced acidolysis of phosphate rock and controlled phosphogypsum crystallization via high shear reactor. Separation and Purification Technology, 380, 135463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.135463
19. Tayibi, H., Choura, M., López, F. A., Alguacil, F. J., & López-Delgado, A. (2009). Environmental impact and management of phosphogypsum. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(8), 2377–2386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.03.007
20. Zhao, Y., Li, X., Yu, J.-X., Li, C., Ruan, Y., Abbas, M. A., & Chi, R. (2025). Migration and transformation behaviors of phosphorus and associated elements in wet-process phosphoric acid: Acidolysis process and mechanism study. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 13(3), 116327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.116327
21. Zhu, G., Yang, Y., He, L., Li, H., Meng, Z., Zheng, G., Li, F., Su, X., Xi, B., & Li, Z. (2023). Novel synergistic process of impurities extraction and phosphogypsum crystallization control in wet-process phosphoric acid. ACS Omega, 8(31), 28122–28132. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c01168