Abstract :

Student engagement is widely regarded as a key determinant of successful learning, yet preliminary observations at a state Islamic junior high school (Madrasah Tsanawiyah) in South Sumatra indicated that students’ affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement had not yet developed optimally. One contextual factor thought to contribute to this pattern is peer social support, given that friendship relationships become increasingly important during early adolescence for meeting the psychological needs of belonging and relatedness. This study aimed to empirically examine the relationship between peer social support and student engagement among seventh- and eighth-grade students. A quantitative correlational design was employed, involving 205 students drawn from a population of 500 through simple random sampling based on the Isaac and Michael table at a 95% confidence level. Data were collected using two five-point Likert scales: a Student Engagement Scale developed from the affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement dimensions proposed by Lam et al. (2014), and a Peer Social Support Scale based on the appraisal, tangible, belonging, and self-esteem support dimensions proposed by Cohen and Wills (as cited in Schonfeld, 1991). Data were analyzed using simple linear regression with SPSS version 27. The results revealed a positive and highly significant relationship between peer social support and student engagement (r = 0.329; R Square = 0.108; p = 0.000), with peer support accounting for 10.8% of the variance in engagement. These findings indicate that greater peer social support is associated with higher student engagement, although most of the variance in engagement is explained by factors beyond peer support alone.

---

Keywords :

early adolescence, Junior High School Students, peer social support, Student Engagement

---

References :

1. Akmal, , Lubis, L., & Haris, A. (2022). The relationship between social support and self-efficacy with student engagement at YPT Pangkalan Susu Private Vocational School, Langkat Regency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(2), 1–9.
2. Andrews, L., Ahmed, S. P., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2020). Navigating the social environment in adolescence: The role of social brain development. Biological Psychiatry, 87(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.09.012
3. Appleton, J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student Engagement With School: Critical Conceptual And Methodological Issues Of The Construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
4. Azwar, (2012). The Development of Psychological Scales (2nd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
5. Bandura, (1986). Social Foundations Of Thought And Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
6. Buchanan, C. M., Romer, D., Wray-Lake, L., & Butler-Barnes, S. T. (2023). Editorial: Adolescent Storm And Stress: A 21st Century Evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1257641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1257641
7. Chen, , Bian, F., & Zhu, Y. (2023). The Relationship Between Social Support And Academic Engagement Among University Students: The Chain Mediating Effects Of Life Satisfaction And Academic Motivation. BMC Public Health, 23, Article 2368. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17301-3
8. Christenson, L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook Of Research On Student Engagement. Springer.
9. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1991). Dimensions Of Functional Social Support And Psychological Symptoms (as cited in Schonfeld, I. S., 1991).
10. Crone, E. A., & Fuligni, A. J. (2020). Self And Others In Adolescence. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050937
11. de Carvalho, A., Veiga, F. H., Martínez, I., & Veiga, C. M. (2025). Psychosocial Development And Student Engagement In School: A Study With Girls And Boys In Early And Late Adolescence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-00440-4
12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-Determination Theory And The Facilitation Of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, And Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
13. Fadhilah, N., & Mukhlis, A. M. A. (2021). The Relationship Between Family Environment, Peer Interaction, And Emotional Intelligence With Students’ Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education, 22(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v22i1.940.2021
14. Finn, D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic Success Among Students At Risk For School Failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234.
15. Fredricks, A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential Of The Concept, State Of The Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
16. Islami, , & Shofiah, V. (2023). The Relationship Between Learning Motivation And Peer Social Support With Student Engagement Among Students. Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 1–9.
17. Jamain, R., Putro, H. Y. S., & Norhidayanti. (2024). Descriptive study of student engagement among seventh-grade students. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Ar-Rahman, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31602/jbkr.v10i1.14743
18. Junianto, M., & Hidayah, N. (2023). Student Engagement: The Role Of Motivation, Teacher Support, And Peer Support. JIT: Journal of Tarbiyah Science, 2(1), 36–60.
19. Lam, , Jimerson, S., Wong, B. P. H., Kikas, E., Shin, H., Veiga, F. H., Hatzichristou, C., Polychroni, F., Cefai, C., Yang, H., Negovan, V., Stanculescu, E., Liu, Y., Basnett, J., Duck, R., Farrell, P., Nelson, B., & Zollneritsch, J. (2014). Understanding And Measuring Student Engagement In School: The Results Of An International Study From 12 Countries. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(2), 213–232.
20. Li, H. (2025). Impact Of Collaborative Learning On Student Engagement In College English Programs: Mediating Effect Of Peer Support And Moderating Role Of Group Size. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1525192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1525192
21. Maryama, , Sari, I. M., & Zulnida, E. F. (2025). The Influence Of Parental, Teacher, And Peer Social Support On Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(1), 79–89.
22. Maslow, H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
23. Mayanti, , Riffani, R., & Akmal, N. (2023). The Contribution Of Peer Social Support To Student Engagement At SMAN 1 Pangkep Regency. Journal of Education and Counseling, 5(2), 1–7.
24. McRae, K., Gross, J., Weber, J., Robertson, E. R., Sokol-Hessner, P., Ray, R. D., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). The Development Of Emotion Regulation: An Fmri Study Of Cognitive Reappraisal In Children, Adolescents And Young Adults. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr093
25. Nasution, F., Hermaini, U., Safitri, R. A., Rahma, Q. A., & Hasibuan, H. M. (2024). Physical Development Of Children And Psychosocial Development Of Adolescents. Observation: Journal of Psychology Publication, 2(1), 11–19.
26. Parmar, S., Mistry, S. K., Micheal, S., Dune, T., Lim, D., Alford, S., & Arora, A. (2025). Peer Support For Improving Student Engagement And Learning Outcomes In Postgraduate Public Health And Health Sciences: A Qualitative Study. Education Sciences, 15(5), Article 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050602
27. Peterson, J. L., Rintamaki, L. S., Brashers, D. E., Goldsmith, D. J., & Neidig, J. L. (2012). The Forms And Functions Of Peer Social Support For People Living With HIV. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 23(4), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2011.08.014
28. Pino-James, N., Shernoff, D. J., Bressler, D. M., Larson, S. C., & Sinha, S. (2019). Instructional Interventions That Support Student Engagement: An International In Handbook of student engagement interventions (pp. 103–119). Elsevier Academic Press.
29. (2013). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Alfabeta
30. (2018). Mixed Methods Research Methodology. Alfabeta
31. Ulmanen, S., Tikkanen, L., & Pyhältö, K. (2024). Sense Of Relatedness And Study Engagement As Mediators Between Students’ Peer Support And Life Satisfaction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 2603–2617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00858-x
32. Zhang, , & Han, H. (2026). The Bidirectional Dynamic Relationship Of Teacher And Peer Support: A Longitudinal Analysis Of Student Engagement In Middle School Physical Education. BMC Psychology, 14, Article 285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-03960-5