Abstract :

The replacement of free plastic bags with alternatives marketed as eco-friendly has transformed the economic and environmental relationships between businesses and consumers; however, charging for bags does not necessarily imply an effective reduction in their consumption and can encourage greenwashing strategies when environmental claims lack verifiable support. The objective of this research was to analyze the economic and environmental implications of changing from free bags to paid bags with an eco-label in businesses in Veracruz–Boca del Río. A descriptive-exploratory study was conducted through direct observation in 16 businesses in the Veracruz–Boca del Río metropolitan area, Veracruz, Mexico, during January and February 2024. The type of material, price, dimensions, delivery conditions, and observed consumer behavior were recorded. The information was systematized through a qualitative-interpretive analysis. Significant differences were identified in prices and marketing methods, noting that conventional bags ranged in price from $1.00 to $17.50 MXN, while those labeled as eco-friendly or reusable ranged from $3.00 to $25.00 MXN. Replacing free bags with paid alternatives eliminated an operating cost and generated a new potential revenue stream. Furthermore, commercial practices based on environmental attributes were observed without sufficient information on reuse or environmental performance. It is concluded that the analyzed transition presents a relevant economic dimension and characteristics consistent with greenwashing; therefore, the environmental effectiveness of these policies should be evaluated using verifiable indicators of reduced consumption and increased bag reuse.

---

Keywords :

convenience stores., merchandise, Pollution, Price, reuse

---

References :

1. Antinyan, A., & Corazzini, L. (2025). breaking The Bag Habit: Testing interventions to reduce plastic bag demand . Ecological Economics, 228, 108454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108454
2. Badhwar, A., Islam, S., Tan, C.S.L., & Panwar, T. (2024). Unraveling green marketing and greenwashing: A systematic review. Sustainability, 16(7), 2738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072738
3. Chong, A., Karlan, D., Shapiro, J., Savonitto, B., & Zinman, J. (2010). Information campaigns to reduce the use of plastic bags in supermarkets in Mexico. Innovations for Poverty action. https://es.poverty-action.org/information-campaigns-reduce-plastic-bag-use-supermarkets-mexico
4. Civancik-Uslu, D., Puig, R., Hauschild, M., & Fullana -i-Palmer, P. (2019). life cycle assessment of carrier bags and development of a littering indicator. Science of the Total Environment, 685, 794–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.372
5. Delmas, M.A., & Burbano, V.C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
6. Fella, S., & Bausa, E. (2024). Green or greenwashed? Examining consumers ‘ ability to identify greenwashing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 95, 102281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102281
7. Gallego-Schmid, A., Mendoza, JMF, & Azapagic, A. (2019). Environmental impacts of takeaway food containers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.220
8. Goodrum, R., Bartokova, B., & Roy, P. (2024). life cycle assessment of banned single-use plastic products and their alternatives. Microplastics, 3(4), 614–633. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics3040038
9. Jakovcevic, A., Steg, L., Mazzeo, N., Caballero, R., Franco, P., Putrino, N., & Favara, J. (2014). Charges for plastic bags: Motivational and behavioral effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.004
10. Jambeck, JR, Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, TR, Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, R., & Law, KL (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352
11. Li, Y., & Wang, B. (2022). Environmental motivation or economic Motivation? Explaining individuals ‘ intention to carry reusable bags for shopping in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 972748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972748
12. Martinho, G., Balaia, N., & Pires, A. (2017). The Portuguese plastic Carrier bag tax: The effects on consumers ‘ behavior . Waste Management, 61, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.023
13. Muposhi, A., Mpinganjira, M., & Wait, M. (2022). Considerations, benefits and unintended consequences of banning plastic shopping bags for environmental sustainability: A systematic literature review. Waste Management & Research, 40(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X211003965
14. Muthu, S.S., Li, Y., Hu, J.Y., & Mok, P.Y. (2011). Coal footprint of shopping (grocery) bags in China, Hong Kong and India. atmospheric Environment, 45(2), 469–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.054
15. Napper, I.E., & Thompson, R.C. (2019). Environmental deterioration of biodegradable, oxo -biodegradable, compostable, and conventional plastic carrier bags in the sea, soil , and open-air over a 3-year period . Environmental Science & Technology, 53(9), 4775–4783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06984
16. Nguyen, H.V., Nguyen, C.H., & Hoang, T.T.B. (2019). Green consumption: Closing the intention – behavior gap. Sustainable Development, 27(1), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1875
17. Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., & Suffolk, C. (2013). The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: Attitudes, behavior and policy effectiveness. Environmental Science & Policy, 27, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.009
18. Romero Valenzuela, DM, & Camarena Gómez, BO (2023). Sustainable and responsible consumption: Concepts and analysis from the perspective of consumer behavior. Vértice Universitario, 25(94), e75. https://doi.org/10.36792/rvu.v25i94.75
19. Senturk, G., & Dumludag, D. (2021). An evaluation of the effect of plastic bag fee on consumer behavior: Case of Turkey . Waste Management, 120, 748–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.042
20. Thomas, G.O., Sautkina, E., Poortinga, W., Wolstenholme, E., & Whitmarsh, L. (2019). The English plastic bag charge changed behavior and increased support for other charges to reduce plastic waste. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00266
21. Tran, TV, Le, MT, & Melad, AM (2024). Intention to use reusable shopping bags in an emerging economy: A Bayesian Mindsponge framework Analysis. Discover Sustainability, 5, 529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00763-9
22. Xanthos, D., & Walker, T. R. (2017). International policies to reduce plastic marine pollution from single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads): A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 118(1–2), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.02.048.