Abstract :

The rapid transition toward low-carbon energy systems and increasing global energy demand have renewed interest in advanced nuclear fission technologies, particularly Generation IV reactors and Small Modular Reactors. This study aims to comparatively evaluate advanced nuclear fuels and structural materials based on their thermal, neutronic, mechanical, chemical, irradiation, and safety performance. An analytical review of scientific and technical literature from academic databases and authoritative nuclear organizations was conducted. The literature was qualitatively synthesized according to fuel type, structural material, reactor concept, coolant, and neutron spectrum. The findings indicate that uranium nitride, uranium silicide, and tri-structural isotropic fuels provide important advantages over conventional uranium dioxide fuel, including higher thermal conductivity, greater fuel density, improved high-temperature performance, and enhanced fission-product retention. Among structural materials, iron-chromium-aluminum alloys, silicon carbide composites, and high-entropy alloys demonstrate promising oxidation resistance, thermal stability, mechanical strength, and irradiation tolerance. However, their performance is strongly dependent on reactor type, neutron spectrum, coolant chemistry, operating temperature, and irradiation conditions. The review further shows that integrating advanced fuels and structural materials with passive safety systems and modular reactor architectures can improve safety, thermal efficiency, sustainability, and economic potential. Major challenges remain in irradiation qualification, corrosion, manufacturing, regulatory approval, economic feasibility, and spent-fuel management. Overall, coordinated development of advanced fuels and structural materials represents a promising pathway toward safer, more efficient, sustainable, and economically viable nuclear energy systems.

---

Keywords :

accident tolerant fuel and passive safety system, advanced nuclear fuel, generation IV reactor, small modular reactor., structural material

---

References :

1. Buongiorno et al. (2018). The Future of Nuclear Energy in a Carbon Constrained World.
2. Chaudri, Ryu, H. J., Review of Neutron Physics Analyses for Accident-Tolerant Fuel System. Engineered Science. https://doi.org/10.30919/es1126
3. Čížek, J., Kalivodová, J., Janeček, M., Stráský, J., Srba, O., & Macková, A. (2021). Advanced Structural Materials for Gas-Cooled Fast Reactors—A Review. Metals, 11(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11010076
4. Dhulipala, S. L. N., Shields, M. D., Spencer, B. W., Bolisetti, C., Slaughter, A. E., Laboure, V. M., & Chakroborty, P. (2021). Active Learning with Multifidelity Modeling for Efficient Rare Event Simulation. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2106.13790
5. Du Toit, M. H., Van Niekerk, F., & Amirkhosravi, S. (2024). Review of thorium-containing fuels in LWRs. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 170, 105136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105136
6. Gadey et al., H. (2024). Options for Managing Spent TRi-structural ISOtropic Nuclear Fuel.
7. Gofryk, K. (2016). Fuel Cycle Research & Development Advanced Fuels Campaign.
8. Grasso, G., Petrovich, C., Mattioli, D., Artioli, C., Sciora, P., Gugiu, D., Bandini, G., Bubelis, E., & Mikityuk, K. (2014). The core design of ALFRED, a demonstrator for the European lead-cooled reactors. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 278, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.07.032
9. Hedayat, A. (2023). A review of advanced Small Modular Reactors SMRs) through a developed PIRT methodology. Radiation Physics and Engineering, (Online First). https://doi.org/10.22034/rpe.2023.401266.1143
10. Holcomb, D. E., Ilas, D., Varma, V. K., Cisneros, A. T., Kelly, R. P., & Gehin, J. C. (2011). Core and Refueling Design Studies for the Advanced High Temperature Reactor (ORNL/TM-2011/365, 1025857; p. ORNL/TM-2011/365, 1025857). https://doi.org/10.2172/1025857
11. Hurley, D. H., El-Azab, A., Bryan, M. S., Cooper, M. W. D., Dennett, C. A., Gofryk, K., He, L., Khafizov, M., Lander, G. H., Manley, M. E., Mann, J. M., Marianetti, C. A., Rickert, K., Selim, F. A., Tonks, M. R., & Wharry, J. P. (2022). Thermal Energy Transport in Oxide Nuclear Fuel. Chemical Reviews, 122(3), 3711–3762. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00262
12. Kadak, A. C. (2016). The Status of the US High-Temperature Gas Reactors. Engineering, 2(1), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.026
13. Lee, J. I. (2024). Review of Small Modular Reactors: Challenges in Safety and Economy to Success. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 41(10), 2761–2780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00207-0
14. Li, Y., You, E., Wang, T., Xing, D., Xu, J., & Zhang, H. (2024). Developments, challenges and prospects in thermal-hydraulic research on accident tolerant fuel. Heliyon, 10(19), e38999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38999
15. May, L., & Werz, M. (2025). A State-of-the-Art Review on Nuclear Reactor Concepts and Associated Advanced Manufacturing Techniques. Energies, 18(16), 4359. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164359
16. (2024). The NEA Small Modular Reactor.
17. Pioro, I. L. (2016). Handbook of generation IV nuclear reactors. Woodhead Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier.
18. Poplavsky, V. M., & Zabudko, L. M. (1998). CURRENT STATUS OF STUDIES ON FR FUEL AND STRUCTURAL MATERIALS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
19. Poston, D. I., Gibson, M. A., Godfroy, T., & McClure, P. R. (2020). KRUSTY Reactor Design. Nuclear Technology, 206(sup1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1725382
20. Rebak, R. B. (2023). Improved and Innovative Accident-Tolerant Nuclear Fuel Materials Considered for Retrofitting Light Water Reactors—A Review. Corrosion and Materials Degradation, 4(3), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd4030024
21. Rochman, D., Algora, A., Àlvarez-Velarde, F., Bardelay, A., Bremnes, Ø., Cabellos, O., Cano-Ott, D., Capponi, L., Carmouze, C., Caruso, S., Cummings, A., Dagan, R., Fallot, M., Fiorito, L., Giot, L., Govers, K., Häkkinen, S., Hannstein, V., Hoefer, A., … Žerovnik, G. (2024). An introduction to Spent Nuclear Fuel decay heat for Light Water Reactors: A review from the NEA WPNCS. EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, 10, 9. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2024010
22. Rodriguez, P., Krishnan, R., & Sundaram, C. V. (1984). Radiation effects in nuclear reactor materials—Correlation with structure. Bulletin of Materials Science, 6(2), 339–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02743907
23. Schulenberg, T. (2022). Fourth generation of nuclear reactors: Fundamentals, types, and benefits explained. Springer.
24. Terrani, K. A., Snead, L. L., & Gehin, J. C. (2012). Microencapsulated fuel technology for commercial light water and advanced reactor application. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 427(1–3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.05.021
25. Tian, W. (2022). Grand challenges in advanced nuclear reactor design. Frontiers in Nuclear Engineering, 1, 1000754. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnuen.2022.1000754
26. Vujić, J., Bergmann, R. M., Škoda, R., & Miletić, M. (2012). Small modular reactors: Simpler, safer, cheaper? Energy, 45(1), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.078
27. Wainwright, H. M., Powell, B. A., Hoover, M. E., Ayoub, A., Atz, M., Benson, C., Borrelli, R. A., Djokic, D., Eddy-Dilek, C. A., Ermakova, D., Hayes, R., Higley, K., Krahn, S., Lagos, L., Landsberger, S., Leggett, C., Regalbuto, M., Roy, W., Shuller-Nickles, L., & Ewing, R. C. (2023). Nuclear waste Educator’s workshop: What and how do we teach about nuclear waste? Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 270, 107288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107288
28. Williams, D. F. (2006). Assessment of Candidate Molten Salt Coolants for the Advanced High Temperature Reactor (AHTR) (ORNL/TM-2006/12, 885975; p. ORNL/TM-2006/12, 885975). https://doi.org/10.2172/885975
29. Xu, F., Cai, L., Salvato, D., Dilemma, F., Giglio, J. J., Benson, M., Murray, D. J., Adkins, C. A., Kane, J. J., Xian, M., Capriotti, L., & Yao, T. (2022). Understanding Fission Gas Bubble Distribution and Zirconium Redistribution in Neutron-irradiated U-Zr Metallic Fuel Using Machine Learning. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 28(S1), 82–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927622001234
30. Zhu, L., Xiang, X., & Wang, X. (2023). Stress analysis of aspherical TRISO-coated particle with X-ray computed tomography. Nuclear Materials and Energy, 34, 101322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2022.101322