Abstract :

The long-term sustainability of nuclear energy relies on the safe management of minor actinides (MAs) and long-lived fission products (LLFPs). The present work aims at systematically evaluating the role of the fast neutron spectrum in the nuclear transmutation of these isotopes in the Lead-cooled Fast Reactors (LFRs) to support the realization of a closed fuel cycle. The present work was performed as a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and summarized data from 24 peer-reviewed sources to compare transmutation efficiency and neutronic features. The results indicate that the fast neutrons spectrum in LFRs is a very efficient environment for the actinide destruction by increasing the probability of the fission with respect to the neutron capture. In contrast to thermal reactors, which have positive D-factors and a tendency to accumulate heavier actinides, LFRs have negative D-factors that lead to waste destruction. In particular, an optimal loading of 1.5 wt% MAs provides annual transmutation rates of 15.18% for Am-241 and 13.07% for Np-237 with support ratios larger than one. This configuration is stable for core criticality and neutron flux distribution, but technical challenges remain, including accumulation of Curium isotopes (Cm-244 and Cm-245) and nearly 50% reduction in the effective delayed neutron fraction, affecting safety margins. In conclusion, LFR technology provides clear neutronic benefits for waste reduction over thermal systems but operational strategies should be optimized for curium management and reactor safety to allow evidence-based development of Generation IV reactors for sustainable waste management.

---

Keywords :

Closed Fuel Cycle, Fast Neutron Spectrum, Lead-cooled Fast Reactor, Minor Actinides, Nuclear Transmutation, Nuclear Waste

---

References :

1. Abram, T., & Ion, S. (2008). Generation-IV nuclear power: A review of the state of the science. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4323–4330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.059
2. Alemberti, A. (2016). The Lead Fast Reactor: An Opportunity for the Future? Engineering, 2(1), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.022
3. Alemberti, A. (2020). Lead-cooled Fast Reactor (LFR) System Safety Assessment.
4. Balovnev, A. V., Davydov, V. K., Zhirnov, A. P., Moiseev, M. A. V., & Soldatov, E. O. (2021). Modelling of Closed Fuel Cycle of the Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor. Izvestiya Wysshikh Uchebnykh Zawedeniy, Yadernaya Energetika, 2021(4), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.26583/npe.2021.4.06
5. Cinotti, L., Smith, C. F., Sekimoto, H., Mansani, L., Reale, M., & Sienicki, J. J. (2011). Lead-cooled system design and challenges in the frame of Generation IV International Forum. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 415(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.042
6. ECD/NEA. (2021). Nuclear Technology in 2021 NEA Activities by Sector  General Information.
7. Generation IV International Forum (GIF). (2022). 2022 GIF Annual Report. (2022).
8. Grambow, B. (2022). Mini review of research requirements for radioactive waste management including disposal. Frontiers in Nuclear Engineering, 1, 1052428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnuen.2022.1052428
9. (2018). Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Proceedings of an International Conference Held in Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 26-29 June 2017. IAEA.
10. (2022). Nuclear Power Reactors in the World. International Atomic Energy Agency.
11. Kiegiel, K., Smoliński, T., & Herdzik-Koniecko, I. (2025). Advanced Nuclear Reactors—Challenges Related to the Reprocessing of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Energies, 18(15), 4080. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154080
12. Liu, B., Han, J., Liu, F., Sheng, J., & Li, Z. (2020). Minor actinide transmutation in the lead-cooled fast reactor. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 119, 103148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103148
13. OECD/NEA. (2002). Accelerator-driven Systems (ADS) and Fast Reactors (FR) in Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles: A Comparative Study.
14. OECD/NEA. (2020). Management and Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste: Global Progress and Solutions.
15. Rohan, H. R. K., & Sahadath, M. H. (2023). Enhancing transmutation rates of minor actinides using Zr and Y hydride and deuteride coatings in an LFR. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 164, 104849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.104849
16. Salvatores, M., & Palmiotti, G. (2011). Radioactive waste partitioning and transmutation within advanced fuel cycles: Achievements and challenges. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 66(1), 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2010.10.001
17. Stanisz, P., Cetnar, J., & Domańska, G. (2015). Modeling minor actinide multiple recycling in a lead-cooled fast reactor to demonstrate a fuel cycle without long-lived nuclear waste. Nukleonika, 60(3), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1515/nuka-2015-0111
18. Sun, X. Y., Han, L. H., Li, X. X., Hu, B. L., Luo, W., & Liu, L. (2023). Transmutation of MAs and LLFPs with a lead-cooled fast reactor. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29002-3
19. Takeda, T. (2016). Minor actinides transmutation performance in a fast reactor. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 95, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.04.031
20. Toshinsky, G. I., Dedul, A. V., Komlev, O. G., Kondaurov, A. V., & Petrochenko, V. V. (2020). Lead-Bismuth and Lead as Coolants for Fast Reactors. World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 10(02), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjnst.2020.102007
21. Toshinsky, G., & Petrochenko, V. (2012). Modular Lead-Bismuth Fast Reactors in Nuclear Power. Sustainability, 4(9), 2293–2316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4092293
22. World Nuclear Association. (2026). Fast Neutron Reactors.
23. Zhang, C., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., & Li, S. (2025). Advancements and Development Trends in Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor Core Design. Processes, 13(6), 1773. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13061773
24. Zhang, K., Wang, W., Duan, C., Chen, X., Duan, W., Luo, X., & Chen, H. (2023). SUMMER：A small modular lead-bismuth-cooled fast reactor for mobile energy supply. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 164, 104860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.104860