Abstract :

This study investigates neutron economy and the thorium fuel cycle within Thorium Molten Salt Reactors to evaluate their potential for sustainable nuclear energy production. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology, this study synthesized recent research published between 2020 and 2026, while also using selected foundational sources from 1960 onward for core nuclear-theory parameters. Data were analyzed using a qualitative and comparative approach, focusing on thorium-232 conversion pathways, uranium-233 production mechanisms, and neutronic performance parameters. The findings indicate that U-233 is a superior fissile fuel for the thorium cycle, exhibiting a high neutron reproduction factor of 2.28 for thermal neutrons and 2.50 for fast neutrons, which supports efficient fuel breeding. The thorium cycle offers significant environmental and security benefits, including a substantial reduction in long-lived transuranic actinides and enhanced proliferation resistance due to the presence of uranium-232, which emits high-energy gamma radiation. Furthermore, TMSR technology provides inherent safety through a negative temperature coefficient and the ability for online fuel processing to remove gaseous fission products.
Unlike previous review studies, this research integrates neutron economy, U-233 purity, breeding ratio, salt chemistry, and reactor safety into a unified conceptual framework, providing a comprehensive analytical perspective for the evaluation of thorium molten salt reactors. The study concludes that while the thorium-uranium cycle is a highly effective alternative for improving neutron efficiency and long-term sustainability, successful commercial deployment depends on achieving U-233 purity levels of approximately 85%. Additionally, further research is required to address remaining challenges in structural materials, salt redox chemistry control, and fuel reprocessing.

---

Keywords :

Breeding Ratio, Molten Salt Reactors, Neutron Economy, Thorium Fuel Cycle, Uranium-233

---

References :

1. Ashraf, O., Rykhlevskii, A., Tikhomirov, G. V., & Huff, K. D. (2020). Strategies for thorium fuel cycle transition in the SD-TMSR. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 148, 107656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107656
2. DiLisi, G. A., Hirsch, A., Murray, M., & Rarick, R. (2018). Thorium and Molten Salt Reactors: Essential Questions for Classroom Discussions. The Physics Teacher, 56(4), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5028245
3. Doligez, X., Heuer, D., Lucotte, E. M., Ghetta, V., Allibert, M., Delpech, S., & Picard, G. (2008). Thorium Molten Salt Reactor reprocessing unit: Characterization and influence on the core behaviour.
4. Dwijayanto, R. A. P., & Harto, A. W. (2024). Comparative Assessment of Molten Salt Reactor Neutronic Performance with Various U-233 Purity. Engineering Journal, 28(5), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2024.28.5.15
5. Heuer, D., Merle-Lucotte, E., Allibert, M., Brovchenko, M., Ghetta, V., & Rubiolo, P. (2014). Towards the thorium fuel cycle with molten salt fast reactors. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 64, 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.08.002
6. Holcomb, D. D. (2020). MOLTEN SALT REACTOR SAFETY ANALYSIS- A U.S. PERSPECTIVE.
7. Jeong, C. J., & Park, C. J. (2006). Dynamic Analysis of the Thorium Fuel Cycle in CANDU Reactors (Technical Report KAERI/TR-3148/2006; KAERI Technical Report Series). Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI).
8. Kang, J., & Von Hippel, F. N. (2001). U‐232 and the proliferation‐resistance of U‐233 in spent fuel. Science & Global Security, 9(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929880108426485
9. Kaygisiz, S. Y. (2023). NEUTRONIC ANALYSIS OF THORIUM-BASED MOLTEN SALT REACTOR.
10. (1966). Introduction To Nuclear Reactor Theory | PDF | Nuclear Energy | Nuclear Physics. https://www.scribd.com/document/212575672/John-R-Lamarsh-Introduction-to-Nuclear-Reactor-Theory
11. Liverhant, S. E. (1960). Elementary introduction to nuclear reactor physics.
12. National Nuclear Laboratory. (2010). The thorium fuel cycle.
13. (2015). Introduction of Thorium in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264241732-en
14. Puthiyavinayagam, P. (2009). Fast Reactor Core Design Module 2: Core Neutronics.
15. Reuss, P. (2020). Neutron physics. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/978-2-7598-0041-4
16. Serp, J., Allibert, M., Beneš, O., Delpech, S., Feynberg, O., Ghetta, V., Heuer, D., Holcomb, D., Ignatiev, V., Kloosterman, J. L., Luzzi, L., Merle-Lucotte, E., Uhlíř, J., Yoshioka, R., & Zhimin, D. (2014). The molten salt reactor (MSR) in generation IV: Overview and perspectives. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 77, 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.014
17. Tsoulfanidis, N., & Landsberger, S. (2010). Measurement and detection of radiation / Nicholas Tsoulfanidis, Sheldon Landsberger. CRC Press. Boca Rato, FL. https://e-bib-fe.extra.cea.fr/Default/doc/SYRACUSE/37720/measurement-and-detection-of-radiation-nicholas-tsoulfanidis-sheldon-landsberger
18. Yang, P., Lin, Z.-K., Wan, W., Zhu, G.-F., Yu, X.-H., & Dai, Z.-M. (2020). Preliminary neutron study of a thorium-based molten salt energy amplifier. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 31(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-0750-8
19. Zhang, Y.-P., Ma, Y.-W., Wu, J.-H., Chen, J.-G., & Cai, X.-Z. (2020). Preliminary analysis of fuel cycle performance for a small modular heavy water-moderated thorium molten salt reactor. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 31(11), 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00823-5