Optimization of Seed Rate for Chickpea Variety FLIP-94 under the Climatic Conditions of Kabul

Vol 9 No 7 (2026): Volume 09 Issue 07 July 2026

Article Date Published : 31 July 2026 | Page No.: 4191-4200 | Google Scholar | Crossref doi for this article

Abstract :

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is a vital pulse crop in semi-arid regions, yet its productivity is often constrained by poor agronomic practices, particularly seed rate management (Bhatt et al., 2022; Rahimi et al., 2024). A field experiment was conducted in Kabul, Afghanistan, to evaluate the effect of five seed rates (65, 75, 85, 95, and 105 kg/ha) on growth and yield performance under semi-arid conditions. The trial was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Results demonstrated significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) among treatments for plant height, leaf area, pods per plant, seeds per pod, 100 seed weight, and yield, while the number of branches per plant showed no significant variation. The optimum seed rate was identified as 85 kg/ha, which produced taller plants (33.2 cm), higher pod numbers (25–32 pods/plant), heavier seeds (31 g per 100 seeds), and improved yield (0.465 kg/m²). Excessive seed rates (105 kg/ha) reduced yield due to overcrowding, intra specific competition, and depletion of limited soil moisture, resulting in smaller seeds (25 g per 100 seeds) and fewer pods (20.7 pods/plant). These findings highlight the critical role of optimized seed rate management in enhancing chickpea productivity under Kabul’s challenging climatic conditions, where short growing seasons, spring frost, and terminal drought are major constraints (Jettner et al., 2019; Siddique et al., 2022). The study provides evidence based recommendations for local farmers to replace traditional broadcast sowing with optimized seed rates, thereby improving food security and income generation in Afghanistan (FAO, 2026; Merga & Haji, 2019).

Keywords :

Chickpea, Growth parameters, Kabul climate, Seed rate, Yield components

References :

  1. Bhatt, R., Singh, R., & Sharma, P. (2022). Chickpea production trends in India: Opportunities and challenges. Agricultural Review, 43(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-216
  2. (2024). Food and Agriculture Organization statistical database. Rome: FAO. https://www.fao.org/faostat
  3. (2026). Agricultural statistics of Afghanistan. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. https://www.fao.org
  4. Gaur, P. M., Kumar, J., & Varshney, R. K. (2022). Root traits and soil improvement in chickpea. Plant and Soil, 468(1–2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05123-7
  5. Gupta, S., Sharma, R., & Singh, P. (2021). Iron bioavailability in pulses: Implications for anemia reduction. Nutrition Reviews, 79(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa123
  6. Jettner, R., Siddique, K. H. M., & Loss, S. P. (2019). Effect of plant density on chickpea yield under dryland conditions. Field Crops Research, 234, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.004
  7. Kumar, V., Sharma, R., & Singh, P. (2020). Taxonomy and phylogeny of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 306(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01634-5
  8. Merga, B., & Haji, J. (2019). Economic importance of chickpea in Ethiopia and South Asia. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1679373
  9. Rahimi, A., Ahmadzai, S., & Khan, M. (2024). Rainfed chickpea production in Afghanistan: Challenges and opportunities. Afghan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(1), 23–34.
  10. Sharma, P., Singh, R., & Kumar, S. (2023). Global chickpea production and productivity trends. International Journal of Legume Research, 46(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlegres.2023.02.005
  11. Siddique, K. H. M., Loss, S. P., & Jettner, R. (2022). Nitrogen fixation and soil fertility improvement in chickpea. Agronomy Journal, 114(3), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20789
  12. Singh, R., Gupta, S., & Sharma, P. (2022). Protein composition of chickpea seeds. Food Science and Technology International, 28(4), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013221101234
  13. Thavarajah, D., Thavarajah, P., & Vandenberg, A. (2022). Pulses as sustainable protein sources. Journal of Food Science, 87(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.16045
  14. Varshney, R. K., Thudi, M., & Roorkiwal, M. (2021). Advances in chickpea genomics. Plant Genome, 14(3), e20075. https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20075
  15. Zafar, S., Ahmad, M., & Khan, A. (2021). Molecular regulation of nitrogen fixation in chickpea. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 678–689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.678689

Author's Affiliation

   Mohammad Qasim Muslim
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kabul University, Kabul, Afghanistan

   Prof. M. Hamed Osmankhil
Advisor, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Kabul University, Kabul, Afghanistan

Copyrights & License

Mohammad Qasim Muslim, Prof. M. Hamed Osmankhil, 2026

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Article Details

How to Cite :

Optimization of Seed Rate for Chickpea Variety FLIP-94 under the Climatic Conditions of Kabul. Mohammad Qasim Muslim, Prof. M. Hamed Osmankhil, 9(7), 4191-4200. Retrieved from https://ijcsrr.org/single-view/?id=27122&pid=26792

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Mohammad Qasim Muslim, Prof. M. Hamed Osmankhil,

View

20

Citation

Downloads

Article Details