Abstract :

This revised manuscript develops a transparent metallurgical-economic screening framework for atmospheric sulfuric acid leaching of a ferruginous nickel laterite ore. The objective is not to prove a universal kinetic mechanism or a final project-level feasibility estimate, but to evaluate how experimentally observed extraction responses translate into preliminary economic ranking under clearly stated assumptions. Duplicate leaching tests were performed at 95-100 °C using sulfuric acid dosages of 700-1000 kg H₂SO₄/t ore and residence times of 30-420 min. The tables report average values used for mass-balance and screening calculations; individual duplicate results are not shown in the main text, and formal significance claims are therefore avoided. Nickel and iron responses were modeled empirically as functions of acid dosage and residence time, while cobalt was included as a revenue component in selected base-case scenarios. The results show that the highest observed Ni extraction, 74.1% at 360 min and 1000 kg H₂SO₄/t ore, also produced the highest Fe dissolution, 65.8%, and a low Ni/Fe selectivity indicator. Under the base-case economic assumptions, the most attractive evaluated scenario was 420 min and 700 kg H₂SO₄/t ore, because the lower acid-addition cost and Fe penalty offset the lower Ni and Co extraction. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that this ranking is assumption-dependent and should be interpreted as a feasibility-screening result rather than a global economic optimum. Non-monotonic extraction behavior between 360 and 420 min is discussed cautiously as a possible combination of experimental dispersion, sampling effects, and secondary Ni retention associated with Fe(III) hydrolysis and sulfate-bearing phases. The revised framework provides a practical route for converting duplicated laboratory leaching tests into auditable, assumption-sensitive screening inputs for early-stage nickel laterite project evaluation.

---

Keywords :

nickel laterite; atmospheric sulfuric acid leaching; empirical modeling; acid dosage; iron dissolution; economic screening; Ni/Fe selectivity; feasibility studies.

---

References :

1. Acquah, G., Abaka-Wood, G. B., Addai-Mensah, J., & Asamoah, R. (2025). Selective comminution for upgrading nickel and cobalt in nickel laterite ores. Minerals Engineering, 233, Article 109667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109667
2. Acquah, G., Skinner, W., Abaka-Wood, G., Spiridonov, P., Addai-Mensah, J., & Asamoah, R. (2026). Extraction of nickel and cobalt from complex low-grade lateritic ores: Challenges and opportunities. Minerals, 16(3), Article 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16030287
3. Agatzini-Leonardou, S., Oustadakis, P., Dimaki, D., Zafiratos, J., Tsakiridis, P., Karidakis, T., Frogoudakis, E., & Drougas, J. (2021). Heap leaching of Greek low-grade nickel oxide ores by dilute sulphuric acid at a pilot-plant scale. Materials Proceedings, 5(1), Article 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2021005065
4. Basuhi, R., Bhuwalka, K., Moore, E., Diersen, I., [oito autores não recuperados]. (2024). Clean energy demand must secure sustainable nickel supply. Joule, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2024.10.008.
5. Binnemans, K., Jones, P.T. The Twelve Principles of Circular Hydrometallurgy.  Sustain. Metall.9, 1–25 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-022-00636-3.
6. Boafo, K., Borkar, P., & Eisele, T. (2026). Overcoming the iron selectivity hurdle in nickel bioleaching: A critical review of mechanisms, economic challenges, and future research directions. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2026.2638765
7. Bonfu, B. A. A., Merah, M., Nakhaei, F., Alagha, L., Moats, M., & Awuah-Offei, K. (2026). Current state of hydrometallurgical processing for the recovery of nickel and cobalt from primary and secondary sources: Part I—Resources and market context, physical beneficiation, and leaching strategies. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2026.2669914
8. Botelho Junior, A. B., Tenório, J. A. S., & Espinosa, D. C. R. (2023). Separation of critical metals by membrane technology under a circular economy framework: A review of the state-of-the-art. Processes, 11(4), Article 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11041256
9. Caetano, G. C., Ostroski, I. C., & Barros, M. A. S. D. (2025). Lateritic nickel and cobalt recovery routes: Strategic technologies. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 46(3), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2024.2328696
10. Chi, D., Yu, J., [três autores não informados], & Li, Y. (2026). Hydrometallurgical technologies of limonitic nickel laterite ore for carbon-neutral metallurgy: A review. JOM. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-026-08139-2.
11. Connelly, D. (2025). The challenges for pressure leaching of nickel. In Ni-Co 2025: 6th International Symposium on Nickel and Cobalt (pp. 341–357). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-00167-2_27
12. Özsoy, B., & Can, İ. B. (2022). Effects of staged-addition of acid on high Ni Co recovery and low scale formation in HPAL of a lateritic ore. Hydrometallurgy, 213, Article 105935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105935
13. .Foss, M. M., & Koelsch, J. (2022, September). Need nickel? How electrifying transport and Chinese investment are playing out in the Indonesian archipelago [Technical report]. Rice University. https://doi.org/10.25613/30S0-Y623
14. Jeong, H.-E., Kang, H., Choi, S., & Kim, H. (2025). Comparative study of limonitic and saprolitic laterite ores on the leaching characteristics under atmospheric pressure. Minerals Engineering, 226, Article 109250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109250
15. Kalupahana, R., Dushyantha, N., & Ratnayake, A. S. (2025). Circular hydrometallurgy to overcome the limitations of conventional extractive metallurgy. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, 11(4), 3322–3342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-025-01247-4
16. Kang, H., Kim, J., Lee, J., Lee, D., Jeong, H.-E., & Kim, H. (2026). Early-stage temperature-dependent leaching kinetics and mechanisms of saprolitic and limonitic nickel laterite ores under atmospheric conditions. Minerals Engineering, 239, Article 110115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2026.110115
17. .Lasut, D. B. E., Kurniawati, R., Dahani, W., & Subandrio. (2023). The effect of concentration and temperature on nickel extraction from laterite nickel ore using atmospheric pressure acid leaching method. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2646(1), Article 050104. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112880
18. Lei, M., Ma, B., Chen, Y., Liu, W., Liu, B., Lv, D., … & Wang, C. (2020). Effective separation and beneficiation of iron and chromium from laterite sulfuric acid leach residue. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 8(9), 3959-3968.
19. Msumange, D. A., Jampaiah, D., Tardio, J., Nilsson, M., Arandiyan, H., & Bhargava, S. K. (2026). A review of nickel and cobalt from laterite ores: Toward sustainable extraction pathways for the battery industry. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, 12(2), 1038–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-026-01439-6
20. .O’Sullivan, O., & Williams, I. (2025). Innovations in nickel leaching leading to minimal waste. In Metallurgy and Materials Society of CIM (Ed.), Proceedings of the 63rd Conference of Metallurgists, COM 2024 (pp. 1855–1863). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67398-6_299
21. Pereira, A. C. (2026b). Balancing nickel recovery, iron dissolution, acid dosage, and residence time in atmospheric sulfuric acid leaching of a ferruginous lateritic nickel ore. Journal International Review of Research Studies, 1(9), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.66104/dempc459
22. Pereira, A. C. (2026b). Quantification of BaCl₂-remobilizable nickel in atmospheric sulfuric leaching residues from ferruginous nickel ores using barium chloride as a sulfate probe. International Review of Research Studies, 1(9). https://doi.org/10.66104/x7rh8151
23. Prameswara, G., Bow, Y., Gustiana, H.S.E.A. et al.Fe Removal Strategy from Morowali Laterite Pregnant Leach Solution: Optimization and Kinetic Study. Trans Indian Inst Met 78, 226 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-025-03705-9.
24. Ribeiro, G. da S., de Deus Nascimento, N., da Silveira Ribeiro, R., de Paole Moreira Miranda, M., Martins, P. R., Caetano, G. C., Alves de Andrade, L., & Ostroski, I. C. (2025). Optimization of the atmospheric acid leaching process for the recovery of nickel and cobalt from iron-rich lateritic ore. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 42, 1127–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-025-01233-0
25. Santos, A. L. A., Becheleni, E. M. A., Viana, P. R. M., Papini, R. M., Silvas, F. P. C., & Rocha, S. D. F. (2021). Kinetics of atmospheric leaching from a Brazilian nickel laterite ore allied to redox potential control. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 38, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00310-w
26. Stanković, S., Kamberović, Ž., Friedrich, B., Stopić, S. R., Sokić, M., Marković, B., & Schippers, A. (2022). Options for hydrometallurgical treatment of Ni-Co lateritic ores for sustainable supply of nickel and cobalt for European battery industry from South-Eastern Europe and Turkey. Metals, 12(5), Article 807. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12050807
27. Suleimen, B., Adilov, G., Abdirashit, A., Kosdauletov, N., Kelamanov, B., Yessengaliyev, D., Arystanbayeva, A., & Abilberikova, A. (2026). Comparative review of processing technologies for oxidized (lateritic) nickel ores. Applied Sciences, 16(9), Article 4478. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16094478
28. Wang, W.-W., Liu, C., Qin, B., Liu, Z.-B., Li, X.-Y., Li, M.-C., Liu, G., Lv, D., Lu, Y.-D., Liu, J., & Chen, S.-X. (2025). Comprehensive recovery of valuable metals from laterite via neutralization sludge. Separation and Purification Technology, 368, Article 133006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133006
29. Wen, J., Tran, T. T., & Lee, M. S. (2025). Recovery of pure Co(II) and Ni(II) solutions from synthetic sulfate leach liquor of laterite ores by precipitation and solvent extraction. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 46(4), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2024.2346652.