Abstract :

This scoping review investigates the potential and challenges of integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into Vocational Education and Training, with a specific focus on the Mechanical Engineering sector of Greek Vocational High Schools (EPA.L.). The purpose of this study is to analyze how AI can transform the teaching of mechanical engineering courses, bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and laboratory practice in the context of Industry 4.0. The methodology involved a literature review of 26 scientific sources (2016-2026), utilizing thematic analysis guided by theoretical frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and teacher self-efficacy. Key findings indicate that the use of specialized, knowledge-enhanced Large Language Models (LLMs) significantly improves the structural integrity and technical accuracy of instructional materials, effectively reducing teacher preparation time. However, despite a high perceived usefulness, the adoption of AI by educators in public schools is severely hindered by the lack of adequate laboratory infrastructure, the absence of discipline-specific training, and heightened AI anxiety regarding ethical risks. In conclusion, the transition to an AI-enhanced school laboratory necessitates immediate upgrades to equipment and a shift from general ICT training to targeted, specialty-specific professional development programs, ultimately empowering teachers to become designers of digital learning experiences.

---

Keywords :

Artificial Intelligence, Industry 4.0, lesson planning, mechanical engineering, teacher self-efficacy, vocational education

---

References :

1. Abhay, G. (2025). Exploring the Impact of Generative AI Use on Teacher Self-Efficacy: A Mixed-Methods Analysis [Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University Irvine].
2. Alier, M., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Camba, J. D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in education: From deceptive to disruptive. International Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 1-15.
3. Bartzoulianou, N. (2024). The use of Artificial Intelligence in lesson planning [Master’s thesis, University of Piraeus].
4. Bergdahl, N., & Sjöberg, J. (2024). Attitudes, perceptions and AI self-efficacy in K-12 education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6(1), 100125.
5. Coşkun, T. K., & Altan, E. B. (2025). Comparative analysis of AI and expert evaluations in engineering design pedagogy. PLoS One, 20(9), e0332715. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332715
6. Diga, A. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions and self-efficacy regarding AI [Master’s thesis, Hellenic Open University].
7. Han, H. (2024). Exploration of intelligent evaluation based on teaching reflection. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(3), 45-56.
8. Kong, S. C., & Yang, W. (2024). AI in education: Rethinking learning, assessment and student agency. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 120-135.
9. Ng, D. T. K., Chan, E. K. C., & Lo, C. K. (2025). Opportunities, challenges and school strategies for integrating generative AI in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8(1), 100373.
10. Ni Uanachain, C., & Ibrahim Aouad, A. (2025). Potential risks of generative AI integration into K-12. Journal of AI in Education, 14(1), 22-38.
11. Pantazatos, P., Taouki, A., & Meli, K. (2024). Generative AI through the teacher lens. Educational Sciences, 14(5), 452.
12. Papazaiti, C. (2025). Evaluation of artificial intelligence tools for lesson planning in Mathematics [Master’s thesis, University of Piraeus].
13. Petropoulou, A. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions on the use of AI [Master’s thesis, Democritus University of Thrace].
14. Tang, Y., & Zhong, L. (2026). K-12 teachers’ adoption of generative AI for teaching: An extended TAM perspective. Education Sciences, 16(2), 1-18.
15. Tao, Y., Huang, C., & Wu, S. (2026). Potential risks of generative AI integration into K-12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 57(1), 15-32.
16. Tomczyk, Ł., & Majkut, A. (2025). Integrating AI in education: An analysis of factors influencing the acceptance, concerns, attitudes, competencies and use of generative artificial intelligence among Polish teachers. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2025(1), 5599169. https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/5599169
17. Zhao, Y., Lin, X., & Wang, Y. (2024). Attitudes and usage patterns of educators towards LLM. Computers in Human Behavior, 150(1), 108250.
18. Zheng, Y., Huang, S., Zeng, X., Huang, Y., Liu, Z., & Luo, W. (2025). Knowledge-enhanced large language models for automatic lesson plan generation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1784. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06004-2