Abstract :

This article investigates the effectiveness of Duolingo in supporting vocabulary retention among young EFL learners and examines their attitudes toward its use. Employing a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design with a quasi-experimental pre-test/ post-test control group framework, the study was conducted over a 12-week intervention period with 60 learners aged 10 to 11 (CEFR Level A2) at a private English center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The experimental group (n = 30) used Duolingo as a supplementary after-school vocabulary tool for approximately 30 minutes per day while the control group (n = 30) received conventional classroom-based instruction only. Quantitative data were collected through researcher-designed parallel-form vocabulary tests and a 25-item Likert-scale questionnaire grounded in the Affective-Behavioral-Cognitive (ABC) attitude model. Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with ten selected participants. Paired-samples t-tests revealed that the experimental group achieved a statistically significant mean gain of 0.97 points (t = -13.760, p < .001), approximately double that of the control group (0.50 points; t = -6.412, p < .001), despite equivalent baselines. Questionnaire findings indicated strongly positive attitudes across all three ABC dimensions, with particularly high agreement on enjoyment (90%), motivation (88%) and vocabulary transfer to communicative contexts (93.6%). Interview data corroborated these findings with experimental group learners describing spaced repetition, multimodal input and gamified rewards as key factors supporting retention and engagement. These findings suggest that Duolingo, when implemented as a structured and monitored supplementary tool, can meaningfully enhance vocabulary retention and foster positive learning attitudes among young EFL learners.

---

Keywords :

Attitude, Duolingo, EFL young learners, Mobile Assisted Language Learning, Vocabulary retention.

---

References :

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
2. Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press.
3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
4. Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
5. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
6. Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model. Peter Lang.
7. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319(5865), 966– https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408.
8. Kohnke, L., Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2019). Using mobile vocabulary learning apps as aids to knowledge retention: Business vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(2), 683–694. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.2.18.683.
9. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
10. Linse, C., & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching:Young learners. McGraw-Hill.
11. Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000065.
12. Munday, P. (2016). The case for using DUOLINGO as part of the language classroom experience. RIED: Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 19(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.19.1.14581
13. Nation, I. S. P. (2011). Research into practice: Vocabulary. Language Teaching, 44(4), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000267
14. Nation, I. S. P (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
15. Pavičić Takač, V. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
16. Pullupaxi Galora, A. E. (2023). Duolingo to enhance English vocabulary acquisition in EFL young learners. Master’s thesis. Universidad Técnica de Ambato.
17. Rahman, S., Damayanti, I., & Setyarini, S. (2024). A case study on Duolingo application in vocabulary learning strategies among EFL students. In The Asian Conference on Arts & Humanities 2024, Official Conference Proceedings (pp. 491-504). The International Academic Forum.
18. Reinders, H. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology. 20(2), 143–154.
19. Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
20. Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921.
21. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Springer.
22. Ta’amneh, I. M., Al-Qeyam, F. R., & Al-Ghazo, A. M. (2024). The Effect of Using Duolingo on Developing EFL Students’ Vocabulary and their Attitudes toward it. Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, 22(2), 3098–3112. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00222.
23. Viberg, O., Wasson, B., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning through learning analytics for self-regulated learning (MALLAS): A conceptual framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6494.