Abstract :

The Intercropped Maize and Fruit Tree System (MIAF) represents an agroecological alternative aimed at improving the productivity, sustainability, and resilience of tropical agroecosystems in the face of the limitations of traditional monocultures. In this context, Land Use Equivalent (LUE) is a fundamental indicator for evaluating the productive efficiency of diversified systems. The objective of this research was to evaluate the Land Use Equivalent in the MIAF system established in Axochio, Veracruz, in order to determine its efficiency compared to monocultures. The research was conducted during the years 2024, 2025, and 2026 at the MIAF-INIFAP Module in Axochio, San Andrés Tuxtla, Veracruz. The evaluated system consisted of 16 species, including fruit trees and annual crops. To determine the LUE, the yields obtained in association within the MIAF system and the national yields for monoculture reported by SIAP and SIACON were used. The results showed high productive diversity, highlighting species such as sapodilla, Persian lime, starfruit, and maize. The total land use efficiency (LUE) obtained was 4.83, a value greater than one, indicating that the integrated agroforestry system (MIAF) uses land more efficiently than monocultures. The largest contributions to the UET came from maize and starfruit. It is concluded that the MIAF system promotes ecological complementarity among species, optimizes resource use, and constitutes a viable strategy for strengthening sustainability and food security in tropical regions.

---

Keywords :

beans, Corn, fruit trees, Soil, terrace

---

References :

1. Altieri, M.A., & Anderson, M.K. (1986). An ecological basis for the development of alternative agricultural systems for small farmers in the Third World. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 1 (1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0889189300000771
2. Altieri, M.A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 74, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00028-6
3. Altieri, MA, Nicholls, CI, & Montalba, R. (2017). Technological approaches to sustainable agriculture at a crossroads: An agroecological perspective. Sustainability, 9(3), 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030349
4. Brooker, RW, Bennett, AE, Cong, WF, Daniell, TJ, George, TS, Hallett, PD, Hawes, C., Iannetta, PPM, Jones, HG, Karley, AJ, Li, L., McKenzie, BM, Pakeman, RJ, Paterson, E., Schöb, C., Shen, J., Squire, G., Watson, C., Zhang, C., Zhang, F., & White, P.J. (2015). Improving intercropping: A synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. Field Crops Research, 184, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.09.010
5. Cortés-Flores, JI, Turrent-Fernández, A., Díaz-Vargas, MA, Hernández-Castro, JM, Mendoza-Martínez, A., & Aceves-Nápoles, CE (2007). The Intercropped Milpa System with Fruit Trees (MIAF): An alternative for sustainable agriculture on hillsides. Acta Académica, 11(2), 47-62.
6. Dimande, P., Arrobas, M., & Rodrigues, M. Â. (2024). Intercropped maize and cowpea increased the land equivalent ratio and enhanced crop access to more nitrogen and phosphorus compared to sole crops. Sustainability, 16, 1440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041440
7. Di Rienzo, JA, Casanoves, F., Balzarini, MG, González, LA, Tablada, EM, & Robledo, CW (2020). InfoStat version 2020. statistical software. Córdoba, Argentina: InfoStat Group. Available at: https://www.infostat.com.ar
8. Federer, W.T., & Schwager, S.J. (1982). On the distribution of land equivalent ratios. CornellUniversity. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/32880
9. García, E. 2004. Modifications to the Köppen Climate Classification System. Institute of Geography, National Autonomous University of Mexico. https://librosoa.unam.mx/handle/123456789/1372
10. Gliessman, S.R. (2018). Defining agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 42(6), 599–600.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2018.1432329
11. 2022. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) in a completely randomized block design. National University of Córdoba. Available at: https://www.infostat.com.ar
12. Jose, S. (2009). Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforestry Systems, 76, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7
13. Keesman, K.J., van der Werf, W., & van Keulen, H. (2007). Production ecology of agroforestry systems: A minimal mechanistic model and analytical derivation of the land equivalent ratio. Mathematical Biosciences, 209 (2), 608–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2007.04.001
14. Li, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Li, P., Chen, Q., Liu, Z., & Zhao, C. (2025). Unveiling drivers and optimizing strategies for enhanced land and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency of sorghum intercropping: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 332, 110033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110033
15. Meza, Jairo. (2019). Intercropped cornfields with fruit trees for climate change resilience, environmental sustainability, and food security in Nicaragua. La Calera, 19, 48-54. https://doi.org/10.5377/calera.v19i32.8440 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336033803_Milpa_intercalada_con_arboles_frutales_para_la_resiliencia_al_cambio_climatico_la_sustentabilidad_ambiental_y_la_seguridad_alimentaria_en_Nicaragua
16. Mead, R., & Willey, R.W. (1980). The concept of a land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture, 16 (3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700010978
17. Nair, P.K.R. (1993). An Introduction to Agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://apps.worldagroforestry.org/Units/Library/Books/PDFs/32_An_introduction_to_agroforestry.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
18. RW Willey. (1979). Intercropping: Its importance and research needs. Field Crop Abstracts, 32, 1–10.
19. Riley, J. (1984). A general form of the land equivalent ratio. Experimental Agriculture, 20 (1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700017555
20. Ruiz Mendoza, Alma Delia, Jiménez Sánchez, Leobardo, Figueroa Rodríguez, Oscar L., & Morales Guerra, Mariano. (2012). Adoption of the intercropped milpa system with fruit trees by five Mixe municipalities in the state of Oaxaca. Mexican Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(8), 1605-1621. Retrieved October 18, 2025, from http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-09342012000800010&lng=es&tlng=es .
21. Agri-Food and Fisheries Information Service (SIAP). 2024. Closure of agricultural production. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Government of Mexico. Available at: https://nube.agricultura.gob.mx/cierre_agricola/
22. Agri-Food and Fisheries Information Service. (2026). Agri-Food Information System for Consultation (SIACON NG) . Government of Mexico. Available at: SIACON NG . https://www.gob.mx/agricultura/dgsiap/documentos/siacon-ng-161430?utm_source=chatgpt.com
23. Tilman, D. (2020). Benefits of intensive agricultural intercropping. Nature Plants, 6, 604–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0677-4
24. Vandermeer, J. (1989). The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623523
25. Vidal Padilla, LDS, Albino Garduño, R., Santiago Mejía, H., Turrent Fernández, A., Ronquillo Cedillo, I., & González Pablo, LG (2022). Intensification of milpa in the State of Mexico: Net incomes, food security and land equivalent ratio. Agrociencia, 56 (4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v56i4.2453
26. Willey, R.W. (1979). Intercropping: Its importance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts, 32, 1–10. https://www.sciepub.com/reference/91148 ; https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.619312
27. Yu, Y., Makowski, D., Stomph, T.J., & van der Werf, W. (2015). Temporal niche differentiation increases the land equivalent ratio of annual intercrops: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 184 , 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.09.010
28. Zetina-Lezama, R., Uribe-Gómez, S., Capetillo-Burela, A., Francisco-Nicolás, N., Hernández-Estrada, CA, & Reynolds-Chávez, MA (2023). Descriptive study of the capacity of six hillside soil management systems to control surface runoff. Agrociencia. https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v57i1.2408
29. Zhang, Y., R. W. Brooker., H. Wang., P. Li., L. Zhang., & J. Zhang. (2023). Intercrop overyielding weakened by high inputs: Global meta-analysis with experimental validation. Agricultural Ecosystems & Environment, 342, 108239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108239