Abstract :

Tall column tests are widely used as an intermediate step between laboratory-scale experiments and industrial heap leaching, aiming to improve the reliability of scale-up predictions by capturing hydro-mechanical and geochemical processes under more representative conditions. However, their predictive value remains inherently limited. This review critically evaluates the extent to which tall columns (2–6 m) reproduce key mechanisms governing industrial heap performance, including progressive compaction, unsaturated flow, preferential pathways, and coupled transport–reaction phenomena. Evidence shows that while tall columns can partially capture vertical chemical gradients, permeability evolution, and delayed reagent consumption, they still fail to represent large-scale heterogeneity, long flow paths, and structural evolution typical of industrial heaps. As a result, the observed extraction kinetics reflect system-dependent effective rates rather than intrinsic reaction kinetics, and direct extrapolation to recovery, hydraulic stability, or long-term performance is unreliable. The analysis also identifies systematic limitations in experimental design, including insufficient column diameter, limited instrumentation, and short test durations, which further constrain data interpretation. A scale-aware framework is proposed that integrates mineralogical characterization, staged testing (from bottle roll to pilot), and coupled hydro-geochemical modeling to improve decision-making and reduce scale-up risk. Tall column tests are therefore best interpreted as diagnostic tools for mechanistic understanding and trend identification, rather than standalone predictors of industrial heap leaching performance.

---

Keywords :

Heap leaching, Hydro-geochemical coupling, Mass transfer, Nickel laterite, Scale-up, Tall column tests

---

References :

1. Acquah, G., Abaka-Wood, G., Skinner, W., Addai-Mensah, J., & Asamoah, R. (2025). Effect of mechanical activation on nickel and cobalt extraction in refractory nickel laterite ore. Powder Technology.
2. Agatzini-Leonardou, S., Oustadakis, P., Dimaki, D., Zafiratos, J., Tsakiridis, P., Karidakis, T., Frogoudakis, E., & Drougas, J. (2021). Heap leaching of Greek low-grade nickel oxide ores by dilute sulphuric acid at a pilot-plant scale. Materials Proceedings, 5(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2021005065.
3. Ansah, E. O., Black, J. R., & Haese, R. R. (2025). Impact of mineral dissolution–precipitation on pore geometry during copper sulphide heap leaching. Minerals Engineering, 230, 109379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109379
4. Ansah, E., Haese, R., Black, J. R., & Jyoti, A. (2023). The importance of reaction mechanisms and coupled dissolution with reprecipitation (CDR) reactions when modelling copper leaching in heap systems. Minerals Engineering, 203, 108357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108357.
5. Arellano, Á. D.B., Yao, T.-m., Milczarek, M., & Brusseau, M. (2022). Column experiments to assess consolidation behaviour at different initial irrigation rates in copper heap leaching. In Proceedings of Heap Leach Solutions 2022 (Sparks, NV, USA, October 16–18.
6. Bárzaga-Martell, L., Diaz-Quezada, S., Estay, H., & Ruiz-del-Solar, J. (2025). Estimation of copper grade, acid consumption, and moisture content in heap leaching using extended and unscented Kalman filters. Minerals, 15(5), 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15050521.
7. Binnemans, K., Jones, P.T. The Twelve Principles of Circular Hydrometallurgy. J. Sustain. Metall. 9, 1–25 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-022-00636-3.
8. Binnemans, K., Jones, P. T., & Manjón Fernández, Á. (2020). Hydrometallurgical processes for the recovery of metals from steel industry by-products: A critical review. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy.
9. Bravo-Gutiérrez, M., Henríquez-Vargas, L., Díaz-Quezada, S., & Estay, H. (2026). Towards generalized heap leaching modeling: A hybrid approach of phenomenological-principles and neural networks. Minerals Engineering, 242, 110197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2026.110197.
10. Chaitanya, G. V. A., & Gupta, G. S. (2023). Liquid flow in heap leaching using the discrete liquid flow model and graph-based void search algorithm. Hydrometallurgy, 221, 106151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2023.106151.
11. Chen, W., Wang, L. & Yin, S. Characterization of Multiscale Pore Structures and Simulation of Seepage Behavior in Sandstone-type Uranium Deposit. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 42, 3587–3600 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-025-01400-3
12. Das, G., & Li, J. (2023). Iron removal as goethite from synthetic laterite leach solutions. ACS Omega, 8(13), Article e2c07595. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c07595
13. Dreier, J. E. (2025). Management of copper heap leach projects: A geologist’s perspective. In Proceedings of the Society of Economic Geologists (Vol. 16). Society of Economic Geologists. https://doi.org/10.5382/COM.16.24.
14. Erskine, A.N., Jin, J., Lin, CL. et al. Effect of Compression and Moisture on Fluid Flow Through Packed Particle Beds of Crushed Ore Studied by High-Resolution X-ray Computed Tomography and the Lattice Boltzmann Method. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 42, 2557–2568 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-025-01296-z.
15. Estay, H., Díaz-Quezada, S. Deconstructing the Leaching Ratio. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 37, 1329–1337 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00243-4.
16. Fang, Z., Gan, M., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., & Fu, X. (2026). Feasibility and challenges of in situ uranium leaching using ozone bubbles: A review. Minerals, 16(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16010002
17. . Faraji, F., Alizadeh, A., Rashchi, F., & Mostoufi, N. (2020). Kinetics of leaching: A review. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 38(2), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2020-0040.
18. Faris, N., Pownceby, M. I., Bruckard, W. J., & Chen, M. (2022). The direct leaching of nickel sulfide flotation concentrates—A historic and state-of-the-art review. Part I: Piloted processes and commercial operations. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 43(6), 407–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2022.2070617.
19. Fernando, W.A.M., De Silva, P.C.P., Guatame-Garcia, A., Vriens, B., Fernando, C.A.N. (2024). Mineral Processing in Bioreactors: Fundamentals and Design Aspects. In: Panda, S., Mishra, S., Akcil, A., Van Hullebusch, E.D. (eds) Biotechnological Innovations in the Mineral-Metal Industry. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43625-3_12.
20. Ghadiri, M. (2020). Investigating variables affecting heap (bio) leaching through determining access to sub-surface mineral grains by micro-scale X-ray tomography (Doctoral dissertation). University of Cape Town.
21. Gibson, B. A. K. K. (2020). Residence time investigation of artificial silver ores in heap leaching using cyanide lixiviant (Master’s thesis, University of Cape Town). http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32642.
22. Gunaratnam, A. A. (2022). A study of basic iron sulphate formation and control in the autoclaving of argentiferous sulphide gold ores (Master’s thesis). University of British Columbia.
23. Hardee, L., Schaef, H. T., Barpaga, D., Stanfield, C. H., et al. (2025). Interfacial hydrophilicity controls mineral transformation outcomes for enstatite and amorphous MgSiO₃. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 12(8), 951–962. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00487
24. Hou, S., Zeng, S., Yang, Y. et al. Multi-Scale Computational Methods for Reactive Transport of in situ Uranium Leaching: Pore Structure Evolution, Multi-Physics Coupling, and Numerical Simulations. Arch Computat Methods Eng (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-026-10519-5.
25. Ibrahim, M. H. (2026). From nickel tailings to carbonates: Utilising AEM electrolysers for simultaneous H₂SO₄ recycling and CO₂ sequestration (PhD thesis, The University of Queensland). https://doi.org/10.14264/eddc8f0.
26. Jeong, H.-E., Kang, H., Choi, S., & Kim, H. (2025). Comparative study of limonitic and saprolitic laterite ores on the leaching characteristics under atmospheric pressure. Minerals Engineering, 226, 109250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109250
27. Jia, Y., Ruan, R., Qu, J., Tan, Q., Sun, H., & Niu, X. (2024). Multi-scale and trans-disciplinary research and technology developments of heap bioleaching. Minerals, 14(8), 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080808.
28. Ju, W., Yang, J., Wang, Z., Yao, C., & Zhang, X. (2021). Formation mechanism of preferential flow paths and seepage characteristics of a novel growable pile for heap leaching of rare earth. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 3010859. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3010859.
29. Kang, H., Kim, J., Lee, J., Lee, D., et al. (2026). Early-stage temperature-dependent leaching kinetics and mechanisms of saprolitic and limonitic nickel laterite ores under atmospheric conditions. Minerals Engineering. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2026.110115.
30. Komnitsas, K., Petrakis, E., & Bartzas, G. (2022). A novel and greener sequential column leaching approach for the treatment of two different Greek laterites. Science of the Total Environment, 854, 158748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158748.
31. Krishnamoorthy, P. (2023). Modelling the transport of thiocarbonyl catalysts through a bed of ore (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia). https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0433094
32. Krishnamoorthy, P., Dixon, D. G., Ren, Z., Mora, N., et al. (2022). Modeling the distribution of an adsorbing solute in a catalyzed column. Minerals Engineering, 182, 107556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107556.
33. Larrabure, G., Salinas-Farran, L., Neethling, S., & Brito-Parada, P. R. (2024). A review on strategies to assess the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of column leaching experiments for heap leaching upscaling. Minerals Engineering, 216, 108892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2024.108892.
34. Larrabure, G., Batchelor, A., Salinas-Farran, L., & Neethling, S. (2025). Assessing surface-level processes during column leaching: A spatiotemporal and multilevel approach combining XPS and SEM-EDS. Minerals Engineering, 228, 109359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109359.
35. León, F., Rojas, L., Bazán, V., Martínez, Y., Peña, A., & Garcia, J. (2025). A systematic review of copper heap leaching: Key operational variables, green reagents, and sustainable engineering strategies. Processes, 13(5), 1513. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051513.
36. Li, G., & Yao, J. (2024). A review of in situ leaching (ISL) for uranium mining. Mining, 4(1), 120–148. https://doi.org/10.3390/mining4010009.
37. Li, G., Luo, J., Rao, M., Peng, Z., & Jiang, T. (2023). Advances and innovations in ferronickel-making. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5227-2
38. Li, J., Yang, H., Tong, L., & Sand, W. (2021). Some aspects of industrial heap bioleaching technology: From basics to practice. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 43(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2021.1893720.
39. Liu, S., Li, Y., Zhan, C., Liu, H., et al. (2026). A review of pollutant leaching from tailings: Numerical modeling, transport mechanisms, and pollution control. Environmental Reviews, 34, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2025-0094.
40. Maghsoudy, S., Bakhtiari, O., & Maghsoudy, S. (2022). Tortuosity prediction and investigation of fluid flow behavior using the pore flow approach in heap leaching. Hydrometallurgy, 211, 105868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105868
41. Majdalani, S., & Guinot, V. (2023). Solute transport in heterogeneous model porous media under different flow rates: Experimental and modeling study. Journal of Hydrology, 616, 128790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128790
42. Mokmeli, M. (2019). Pre-feasibility study in hydrometallurgical treatment of low-grade chalcopyrite ores from Sarcheshmeh copper mine. Hydrometallurgy, 191, 105215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.105215
43. Msumange, D.A., Jampaiah, D., Tardio, J. et al. A Review of Nickel and Cobalt from Laterite Ores: Toward Sustainable Extraction Pathways for the Battery Industry. J. Sustain. Metall. 12, 1038–1069 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-026-01439-6.
44. Odidi, M., Fagan-Endres, M. A., & Harrison, S. T. L. (2024). Comparison of nonreactive solute transport models to evaluate fluid flow in packed beds, with implications for heap leaching practice. Hydrometallurgy, 230(1), 106395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2024.106395.
45. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160.
46. Pandey, N., Tripathy, S.K., Patra, S.K. et al. Recent Progress in Hydrometallurgical Processing of Nickel Lateritic Ore. Trans Indian Inst Met 76, 11–30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02706-2.
47. Pereira, A. C. (2014). Desenvolvimento de procedimento experimental para o diagnóstico de lixiviação de cobre contido em minérios oxidados [Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto]. eduCAPES. http://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/1025997.
48. Pereira, A. C. (2026a). Dump heap leaching systems: Engineering design, hydrodynamics, environmental control, and industrial applications. REMUNOM, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.66104/4w2dd058.
49. Pereira, A. C. (2026a). Dump heap leaching systems: Engineering design, hydrodynamics, environmental control, and industrial applications. REMUNOM, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.66104/4w2dd058.
50. Pereira, A. C. (2026c). Bottle roll tests for kinetic evaluation of nickel ores: Capabilities, limitations, and misinterpretations – A critical review. REMUNOM, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.66104/z4cay337.
51. Pereira, A. C. (2026d). Short column tests for nickel heap leaching: Critical review of test design, hydraulic artifacts, and scale-up reliability. REMUNOM, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.66104/y9zx6g57
52. Pereira, A. C. (2026e). From columns to industrial heaps: Critical design considerations for heap leach pilot plants. International Journal of Modern Research in Engineering and Technology (IJMRET), 11(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18979542
53. Pereira, A. C., Gomes, M. R. dos S., & Manfridini, A. P. de A. (2019). Ensaios exploratórios de lixiviação do ouro associado a minérios limoníticos. Brazilian Applied Science Review, 3(2), 1010–1022. https://doi.org/10.34115/basr.v3i2.998.
54. Pereira, A. C., Heck, N. B., & Gomes, M. R. dos S. (2016). Aplicação de diagnóstico de lixiviação como suporte à pesquisa mineral de minério de transição de cobre. Tecnologia em Metalurgia, Materiais e Mineração, 13(3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.4322/2176-1523.0985.
55. Petersen, J., & van Staden, P. (2025). Heap leaching: Process, principles, and practical considerations. In S. Seetharaman (Ed.), Treatise on process metallurgy (Vol. 2B: Unit processes, pp. 333–345). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-40294-4.00029-.
56. Prameswara, G., Amin, I., Ulfah, A.N. et al. Atmospheric Leaching Behavior and Kinetics Study of Roasted Laterite Ore. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 41, 1025–1033 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-00947-x.
57. Ram, R., Beiza, L., Becker, M., Pownceby, M., Chen, M., Yang, Y., Yang, S., & Petersen, J. (2020). Study of the leaching and pore evolution in large particles of a sulfide ore. Hydrometallurgy, 192, 105261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105261.
58. Ribeiro, P. P. M., dos Santos, I. D., Neumann, R., et al. (2021). Roasting and leaching behavior of nickel laterite ore. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B.
59. Robertson, S., van Staden, P., Cherkaev, A., & Petersen, J. (2021). Properties governing solution flow through crushed ore. Hydrometallurgy.
60. Robertson, S. W., & Petersen, J. (2024). Modeling unsaturated dual-phase flow through crushed ores for heap leaching. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 124(12). https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/697/2024.
61. Rosemann, M., Etschmann, B., Verdugo, L., Geraki, K., et al. (2025). The gangue sponge: Implications for in-situ/heap leaching of chalcopyrite. Applied Geochemistry, 190, 106500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2025.106500
62. .Saldaña, M., Gálvez, E., Robles, P., Castillo, J., & Toro, N. (2022). Copper mineral leaching mathematical models—A review. Materials, 15(5), 1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051757.
63. Saldaña, M., Neira, P., Flores, V., Robles, P., & Moraga, C. (2021). A decision support system for changes in operation modes of the copper heap leaching process. Metals, 11(7), 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11071025
64. . Segura, J. J. (2026). From columns to heaps: Dimensionless similarity with particle-size-distributed Damköhler numbers and dual-porosity flow. Transport Phenomena. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/tp-2026-0022 .
65. Shayakhmetova, R., Mukhametzhanova, A., Osipov, P., Kali, A., Kuandykova, A., & Rakhym, A. (2025). Mechanism, kinetics and thermodynamics of nickel, iron, and magnesium hydrochloric acid leaching from laterite ore. Scientific Reports, 15, 41342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-41342-0
66. Stanković, S., Goldmann, S., Kraemer, D., Ufer, K., & Schippers, A. (2024). Bioleaching of a lateritic ore (Piauí, Brazil) in percolators. Hydrometallurgy, 224, 106262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2024.106262.
67. Stanković, S., Kamberović, Ž., Friedrich, B., Stopić, S. R., Sokić, M., Marković, B., & Schippers, A. (2022). Options for hydrometallurgical treatment of Ni–Co lateritic ores for sustainable supply of nickel and cobalt for the European battery industry from South-Eastern Europe and Turkey. Metals, 12(5), 807. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12050807.
68. Surimbayev, B., Sergeevna, B. L., Akcil, A., Yessengarayev, Y., et al. (2026). Technology development of gold heap leaching in Kazakhstan: An overview. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 47(2), 226–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2024.2448786
69. . Surya, B.P., Liu, W., Yan, X. et al. Enhancing Nickel Recovery from Laterite Ores via High-Pressure Acid Leaching: Machine Learning and Design of Experiments for Process Optimization and Environmental Sustainability. J. Sustain. Metall. 12, 122–141 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-025-01290-1.
70. Thomas, S., Bradley, K., Battochio, B., Battochio, B., et al. (2024). Heap leach of asbestos tailings to recover critical metals for battery feed and magnesium for carbon capture. In Proceedings of Conference of Metallurgists (COM 2024) (63rd ed., pp. 1195–1204). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67398-6_204.
71. Toro, N., Ghorbani, Y., Turan, M. D., Robles, P., & Gálvez, E. (2021). Gangues and clays minerals as rate-limiting factors in copper heap leaching: A review. Metals, 11(10), 1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11101539.
72. Top, S., Kursunoglu, S., & Ichlas, Z. T. (2020). Effects of leaching parameters on the dissolution of nickel, cobalt, manganese and iron from Caldag lateritic nickel ore in hydrochloric acid solution. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 59(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00084433.2020.1780560.
73. Trinanda, A. F., Lestari, R., Juliansyah, M. I., Maharani, R. A. S., & Nugraha, N. K. (2026). Eco-efficient nickel: Heap leaching as a game-changer for Indonesia’s nickel industry. E3S Web of Conferences, 693, 02003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669302003.
74. .van Staden, P., & Petersen, J. (2021). Towards fundamentally based heap leaching scale-up. Minerals Engineering, 168, 106915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106915.
75. Véliz, M., Videla Leiva, A., & Martínez Bellange, P. (2023). Copper bioleaching operations in Chile: Towards new challenges and developments. In D. B. Johnson, C. G. Bryan, M. Schlömann, & F. F. Roberto (Eds.), Biomining technologies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05382-5_9
76. Vriens, B., Plante, B., Seigneur, N., & Jamieson, H. (2020). Mine waste rock: Insights for sustainable hydrogeochemical management. Minerals, 10(9), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090728.
77. Wang, L., Yin, S., & Wu, A. (2020). Visualization of flow behavior in ore-segregated packed beds with fine interlayers. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 27(7), 900–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2059-3.
78. Wang, L., Yin, S., Zhang, X., Yan, Z., & Liao, W. (2022). Hydrodynamic hysteresis and solute transport in agglomerated heaps under irrigation, stacking, and bioleaching controlling. Minerals, 12(12), 1623. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121623
79. Wang, Z., Shi, J., & Zhong, C. (2021). Influence of jarosite precipitation on iron balance in heap bioleaching at Monywa copper mine. Journal of Mining Institute (Zapiski Gornogo Instituta)..
80. Winarko, R., Liu, W., Dreisinger, D. B., & Miura, A. (2022, October 16–18). Modeling the iodine-assisted chalcopyrite leaching in ferric sulfate media in response to operating parameters in heap leaching. In Proceedings of Heap Leach Solutions 2022 (Sparks, NV, USA)..
81. Winarko, R., Dreisinger, D. B., Miura, A., Fukano, Y., et al. (2023). Modelling the scale-up of the iodine-assisted chalcopyrite leaching in ferric sulfate media from reactors to columns and simulating heap operations. Hydrometallurgy, 222, 106203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2023.106203
82. Zheng, Q. (2026). X-ray imaging of fluid flow and reactive transport in dual-porosity media: Implications for heap leaching (Doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales).