Free Acidity in Hydrometallurgy is not pH: A Critical Review of Measurement Methods, Errors, and Process Consequences

Vol 9 No 3 (2026): Volume 09 Issue 03 March 2026

Article Date Published : 11 March 2026 | Page No.: 1233-1260 | Google Scholar | Crossref doi for this article

Abstract :

Free acidity is a key control parameter in hydrometallurgical processes, governing dissolution, precipitation, solvent extraction, neutralization, and corrosion behavior, yet its determination in real process liquors remains poorly standardized and often misunderstood. In industrial solutions, the distinction between total acidity, free acidity, and active acidity is frequently obscured by high ionic strength, metal hydrolysis, ion pairing, and complexation reactions, making simple pH measurement or conventional titration unreliable. This review critically examines the main analytical approaches used to determine free acidity in hydrometallurgical liquors, including classical acid–base titration, potentiometric and Gran methods, oxalate and complexation-based procedures, Ba(OH)₂ and other selective titrations, inline monitoring techniques, and speciation-based modeling calculations. Particular emphasis is given to the effect of interfering species commonly present in industrial circuits, such as Fe³⁺, Al³⁺, SO₄²⁻, Cl⁻, and F⁻, which strongly influence endpoint detection, hydrogen ion activity, and the apparent acid balance. The review shows that discrepancies between analytical methods are not only experimental but also thermodynamic, arising from differences between proton concentration, activity, and chemically bound acidity. These inconsistencies can lead to significant errors in process control, affecting reagent consumption, precipitation efficiency, scaling, solvent extraction stability, and environmental performance. By comparing reported methods and industrial practices, this work identifies the limitations of current procedures and highlights the need for standardized definitions, speciation-aware analysis, and improved inline monitoring strategies for reliable acidity control in modern hydrometallurgical operations.

Keywords :

Acid dosing; control; circular acid regeneration, Free acidity; hydrometallurgy, Gran titration, Oxalate method

References :

  1. Arana Juve, J. M., Christensen, F. M. S., Wang, Y., & Wei, Z. (2022). Electrodialysis for metal removal and recovery: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 435, 134857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.134857
  2. Arpalahti, A. (2021). Heap leaching of nickel sulfide ore [Master’s thesis, Aalto University]. Aaltodoc. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstreams/c1c6d978-c310-4a0d-b023-f581b857a53a/download
  3. Arnold, A. M., Kennedy, Z. C., & Hutchison, J. R. (2022). A simple, cost-effective colorimetric assay for aluminum ions via complexation with the flavonoid rutin. PeerJ Analytical Chemistry, 4, e19. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-achem.19
  4. Bai, J., Deng, Z., Wei, C., Li, M., & Li, X. (2025). The effect of silicon and iron on leaching germanium in the oxygen pressure leaching process of zinc oxide dust. JOM, 77(11), 9113–9124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-025-07738-9
  5. Bashir, S. M., Norhadif, M., Xia, Z., Qian, L., & Gyenge, E. L. (2024). Improved titrimetric analysis of formate/formic acid and comparison with ion chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Analytical Letters, 57(15), 2560–2571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2023.2297411
  6. Canales, C., Montenegro, V., Petersen, J., & Ghorbani, Y. (2024). Control of heap leach piles using deep reinforcement learning. Minerals Engineering, 213, 108892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2024.108892
  7. Chernyaev, A., Zou, Y., Wilson, B. P., & Lundström, M. (2022). The interference of copper, iron and aluminum with hydrogen peroxide and its effects on reductive leaching of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2. Separation and Purification Technology, 281, 119903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119903
  8. Das, G., Li, Z., Zhang, H., & Chen, J. (2023). Modeling phase equilibria and speciation in aqueous rare-earth systems. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 629, 742–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.09.085
  9. Dobre, T., Isopencu, G. O., Bdaiwi Ahmed, S., & Deleanu, I. M. (2024). Heavy metal pollution and solutions for its control: General aspects with a focus on cobalt removal and recovery from aqueous systems. ChemEngineering, 8(6), 118. https://www.mdpi.com/2305-7084/8/6/118
  10. Dong, S., Li, T., Yao, Z. P., & Jiang, J. (2025). The ilmenite-to-TiO2: A greener way to prepare titanium dioxide by hydrometallurgical hydrochloric route. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 119720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.119720
  11. Dutta, S., Mukhopadhyay, S., Gaddam, S., Shenoy, K. T., & Mirji, K. V. (2021). Process development for the separation of niobium and tantalum from fluoride medium using trioctyl amine and application of Taguchi’s method to optimize solvent extraction parameters. Hydrometallurgy, 199, 105522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105522
  12. Free, M. L. (2021). Hydrometallurgy: fundamentals and applications. Springer Nature
  13. Godirilwe, L. L., Magwaneng, R. S., Sagami, R., Haga, K., Batnasan, A., Aoki, S., & Shibayama, A. (2021). Extraction of copper from complex carbonaceous sulfide ore by direct high-pressure leaching. Minerals Engineering, 173, 107181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107181
  14. Godirilwe, L. L., Oinuma, R., Batnasan, A., Haga, K., Jeon, S., Takasaki, Y., & Shibayama, A. (2024). Arsenic immobilization from high-As sulfide copper ores through high-pressure leaching with ferric and sodium chloride media. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 12(5), 113884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.113884
  15. Gouyon, J., d’Orlyé, F., Zimmerman, J., Griveau, S., Bedioui, F., & Varenne, A. (2020). Speciation and quantitation of precious metals in model acidic leach liquors, theoretical and practical aspects of recycling. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 412(19), 4595-4608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02707-4
  16. Guo, Y., Liu, H., Cao, H., Dong, X., Wang, Z., Chen, J., & Xu, C. (2023). Complexation of uranyl with benzoic acid in aqueous solution at variable temperatures: Potentiometry, spectrophotometry and DFT calculations. Dalton Transactions, 52(32), 11265–11271. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3DT01896B
  17. Han, K. N., Kim, R., & Kim, J. (2023). Recent advancements in hydrometallurgy: Solubility and separation. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 76, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-023-02956-8
  18. Harvey, T., Amelunxen, P., Akerstrom, B., & Holtzapple, A. (2025). Dynamic modeling of the MantoVerde heap leach operation. In International copper conference (pp. 579–586). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-00102-3_53
  19. Heller, F. D., Ahlers, L. R., Nordquist, Z. E., Gunawardena, N. H., French, A. D., Lines, A. M., & Bryan, S. A. (2022). Development of online pH monitoring for lactic, malonic, citric, and oxalic acids based on Raman spectroscopy using hierarchical chemometric modeling. Analytical Chemistry, 94(50), 17467–17476. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04185
  20. Ibrahim, M. H., Batstone, D., Vaughan, J., & Steel, K. (2025). CO2-induced pH control reduces cathode scaling and enhances electrochemical acid recovery from nickel laterite waste solution. Separation and Purification Technology, 135075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.135075
  21. Jianxun, S., & Haiqiong, M. (2025). Comparative analysis of domestic and foreign standards for permanganate index determination. Discover Chemistry, 2(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44371-025-00129-8
  22. Karppinen, A., Seisko, S., & Lundström, M. (2024). Atmospheric leaching of Ni, Co, Cu, and Zn from sulfide tailings using various oxidants. Minerals Engineering, 207, 108576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2024.108576
  23. Khalid, H. M., & Santos, R. M. (2025). Deep eutectic solvents and ionic liquids in hydrometallurgical recovery of metals: A review of recent advances and challenges. Hydrometallurgy, 238, 106571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2025.106571
  24. Kokko, K. (2023). Automated on-line ion chromatographic determination and monitoring of anionic sulfur species in reclaimed process water: Development and validation of a novel method for a full-scale Ni–Cu concentrator plant [Doctoral dissertation]. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2023030730243
  25. Kumar Vinayak, A., Majid, M., Xia, L., & Wang, X. (2025). Critical review of acid leaching for recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 8(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-025-00266-9
  26. Lawrence, G. B., & Roy, K. M. (2021). Ongoing increases in dissolved organic carbon are sustained by decreases in ionic strength rather than decreased acidity in waters recovering from acidic deposition. Science of the Total Environment, 766, 142529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142529
  27. Li, X. X., Du, M. X., Ma, C. Y., Dong, W. K., & Ding, Y. J. (2024). A more flexible long-chain bis(salamo)-like fluorescent probe based on FRET and ICT effects for the identification of aluminum ion in the environment and plants. Journal of Molecular Structure, 1295, 136792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.136792
  28. Lim, J., Jang, Y., Lee, J., Lee, C., Jbari, O., Kwon, K., & Chung, E. (2025). Hydrometallurgical process of spent lithium-ion battery recycling. Part 2: Recovery of valuable metals from leachates—Review and cost analysis. Hydrometallurgy, 236, 106516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2025.106516
  29. Liu, W., Chen, Q., Hu, Y., & Li, J. (2022). Thermodynamic analysis of metal speciation in chloride leaching systems using aqueous equilibrium modeling. Hydrometallurgy, 209, 105827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105827
  30. Lodeiro, P., Rey-Castro, C., David, C., Achterberg, E. P., Puy, J., & Gledhill, M. (2020). Acid-base properties of dissolved organic matter extracted from the marine environment. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138437
  31. Lizama, H. M. (2021). How copper dump leaching works. Minerals Engineering, 171, 107075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107075
  32. Ma, Y., Yang, Y., Gao, X., Fan, R., & Chen, M. (2021). The galvanic effect of pyrite enhanced (bio)leaching of enargite (Cu3AsS4). Hydrometallurgy, 202, 105613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2021.105613
  33. Masac, J., Lovic, J., Beinrohr, E., & Cacho, F. (2021). Indirect determination of aluminum(III) in water samples by in-electrode coulometric titration. Microchemical Journal, 164, 106058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2021.106058
  34. Moghadam, S. K., Santos, R. M., & Kim, T. (2026). Hydrometallurgical recycling of SmCo magnets: Recovery strategies and process optimization. Hydrometallurgy, 241, 106720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2026.106720
  35. Mwiathi, N. F., Gao, X., Li, C., & Rashid, A. (2022). The occurrence of geogenic fluoride in shallow aquifers of Kenya Rift Valley and its implications in groundwater management. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 229, 113046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113046
  36. Nogueira, C. A., Paiva, A. P., Costa, M. C., & da Costa, A. M. R. (2020). Leaching efficiency and kinetics of the recovery of palladium and rhodium from a spent auto-catalyst in HCl/CuCl₂ media. Environmental Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1563635
  37. Ooi, A. W. S., Qian, J., Vibbert, H. B., Grorud, A. P., & Moment, A. J. (2024). 2-Hydroxyaryloximes as tunable extractants for selective first-row transition metal liquid–liquid extraction: Dimerization coefficients, pKa, and pH0.5. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 64(1), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03926
  38. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  39. Peng, X., Liu, W., Liu, W., Zhao, L., Zhang, N., Gu, X., & Zhou, S. (2021). Fluorite enhanced magnesium recovery from serpentine tailings: Kinetics and reaction mechanisms. Hydrometallurgy, 201, 105571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2021.105571
  40. Pereira, A. C., & Barbosa, V. da S. B. (2017). Effectiveness of acidic pre-cleaning for copper–gold ore. REM – International Engineering Journal, 70(4), 445–450. https://doi.org/10.1590/0370-44672016700126
  41. Pereira, A. C., & Santos, J. R. dos. (2025). Critical evaluation of the Gran method for free acidity determination in sulfuric solutions containing interfering ions. Brazilian Applied Science Review, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.34115/basrv9n2-004
  42. Pereira, A. C., dos Santos, J. R., & da Cunha Fonseca, R. B. (2025). Determination of free acidity in sulfuric liquors using the oxalate method: Scope, limitations, and validation. Revista Multidisciplinar do Nordeste Mineiro, 18(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.61164/1knf6e79
  43. Rudnik, E. (2025). Effect of pH-dependent bath speciation on cobalt electrodeposition from sulfate–gluconate solutions. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 35(7), 2399–2420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(25)66823-3
  44. Sharma, A., Gupta, M., & Goyal, A. (2022). Aqueous acid-base titrations. In Advanced techniques of analytical chemistry (pp. 27–44). ISBN 978-981-5050-23-3.
  45. Shoukang, Z. (2024). Primary note on copper hydrometallurgy. In The ECPH encyclopedia of mining and metallurgy (pp. 1690–1691). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2086-0_612
  46. Silva, R. G., Morais, C. A., & Oliveira, É. D. (2020). Evaluation of different neutralization reagents in the selective removal of impurities in rare earth sulfuric liquor. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 37(1), 65-78.
  47. Sun, X., Jiang, L., Duan, N., Zhu, G., Xu, Y., Jin, H., Liu, Y., & Zhang, R. (2024). Efficient recovery of copper resources from copper smelting waste acid based on Cu(II)/As(III) competitive sulfuration mechanism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 451, 141975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141975
  48. Tabelin, C. B., Park, I., Phengsaart, T., Jeon, S., Villacorte-Tabelin, M., Alonzo, D., Yoo, K., Ito, M., & Hiroyoshi, N. (2021). Copper and critical metals production from porphyry ores and e-wastes: Processing, recycling and environmental aspects. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 170, 105610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105610
  49. Thomas, M. (2021). Understanding gangue acid consumption in copper sulfide heap leaching: Predicting the impact of carbonates, silicates and secondary precipitates. Minerals Engineering, 171, 107090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107090
  50. Verma, A. (2021). Sustainable processes for critical metal recovery using oxalate chemistry [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/29dc0aabd7f1a7f28cbc0d7a540add14/1
  51. Wang, Y., Li, J., Zhao, H., & Chen, G. (2023). Recovery of acids and metals from industrial waste solutions by crystallization and phase separation: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135289
  52. Wu, H., Lu, W., Chen, Y., Zhang, P., & Cheng, X. (2020). Application of Boehm titration for the quantitative measurement of soot oxygen functional groups. Energy & Fuels, 34(6), 7363–7372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00904
  53. Yang, H., Mishima, T., Katazakai, S., & Kagabu, M. (2023). Analytical approach using a chemical equilibrium formula and geochemical modeling for alkalinity measurements of small natural water samples. Applied Geochemistry, 148, 105535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105535
  54. Zhou, Z., Wan, Q., Yu, W., Nie, X., Yang, S., Yang, S., & Qin, Z. (2024). Influence of sulfate and nitrate on metal speciation in aqueous systems. Minerals, 14(3), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14030268

Author's Affiliation

   Antonio Clareti Pereira
Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP) – Department of Graduate Program in Materials Engineering, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8115-4279

Copyrights & License

Antonio Clareti Pereira, 2026

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Article Details

How to Cite :

Free Acidity in Hydrometallurgy is not pH: A Critical Review of Measurement Methods, Errors, and Process Consequences. Antonio Clareti Pereira, 9(3), 1233-1260. Retrieved from https://ijcsrr.org/single-view/?id=25681&pid=25621

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Antonio Clareti Pereira,

View

28

Citation

Downloads

Article Details