Abstract :
This study investigates the interplay between motivational orientations, learning climate, and student engagement within elite undergraduate dance programs in Guangdong, China. While Self-Determination Theory (SDT) typically frames controlled motivation as maladaptive, this research posits a “Guangdong–SDT Paradox,” where culturally embedded obligations support persistence. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 509 dance students across six institutions and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results identify learning climate as the dominant predictor of multidimensional engagement, explaining over 70% of the variance. Consistent with SDT, autonomous motivation strongly predicted engagement and partially mediated the influence of the learning climate. However, contrary to Western-centric models, controlled motivation exhibited a significant positive effect on engagement, suggesting that collectivist values such as filial piety and institutional “face” function as adaptive mechanisms in high-performance contexts. These findings support a theory of “contextualized universality,” where basic psychological needs are universal but their expression is culturally modulated. The study concludes that instructor-led autonomy support is essential for internalizing both intrinsic and culturally sanctioned motivations, offering a framework for sustaining engagement in elite arts education.
Keywords :
Self-Determination Theory; student engagement; learning climate; dance education; Guangdong–SDT Paradox; cultural internalization; collectivism.References :
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
- Cano, D. B., & Gomez-Baya, D. (2025). Self-determination theory-based interventions to promote physical activity and sport in adolescents: A scoping review. Youth, 5(3), 98.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory: An overview. Springer Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 6229–6235.
- Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144.
- Pelletier, L., et al. (2013). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale-II (SMS-II). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(5), 450–461.
- Li, J. (2012). Cultural values and motivation in Chinese education: The role of filial piety. Journal of Moral Education, 41(4), 491–508.
- Ministry of Education of China. (2020). Guidelines on the preservation of intangible cultural heritage in higher education. MOE Press.
- Chen, Y. (2015). Yingge dance and collective identity in Chaoshan. Asian Theatre Journal, 32(1), 45–67.
- Wang, H. (2021). Institutional ‘face’ and student motivation in Chinese conservatories. China Education Review, 18(2), 210–229.
- Chirkov, S. (2009). Culture and autonomy: The role of individualism and collectivism in self-determination theory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(2), 159–180.
- Jang, M. (2019). Motivation and collectivism: Extending SDT in East Asian contexts. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22(3), 215–229.
- Reeve, J. (2009). Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175.
- Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218.
- Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 25(4), 297–308.
- Kuh, G. D. (2009). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches. Routledge.
- Skinner, F., & Belmont, E. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.
- Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
- Greene, C. M. (2016). Agentic engagement and proactive learning behaviors. Learning and Instruction, 45, 1–10.
- Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A primer. Sage.
- Hair, J. F., et al. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
- Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (2022). SmartPLS 4[Computer software]. SmartPLS GmbH.
- Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
- Shmueli, J., et al. (2020). PLSpredict: Model assessment in PLS-SEM. Journal of Business Research, 113, 315–329.
- Yamamoto, T. (2014). Obligation and motivation in Japanese education. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(3), 215–233.
- Kim, S. (2020). Loyalty and persistence in Korean higher education: A motivational analysis. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 57(2), 145–167.
- Rahman, A. (2020). Collectivism and motivation in Southeast Asian classrooms. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(4), 567–582.
