Abstract :

This study presents a quantitative comparative analysis of environmental performance before and after an architectural intervention on a vernacular dwelling in the Gunungkidul District, Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia. Conducted as a longitudinal field investigation, the research employed a baseline-endline methodology with data collection in June 2025 (pre-intervention) and October 2025 (post-intervention). Key metrics included surface temperatures of building components (ceiling, walls, floor) and comprehensive indoor air quality (IAQ) parameters, notably particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) concentrations, measured against national ambient air quality standards (NAB). The results demonstrate a pronounced dual outcome. The intervention achieved its primary objective of drastically improving IAQ, with PM10 and PM2.5 levels reduced by over 90%, transitioning from exceeding to far below the NAB thresholds. However, this significant improvement coincided with a critical trade-off. A severe reduction in indoor air velocity (78%) altered the thermal environment, leading to mixed results: while floor temperatures decreased consistently, other components showed varied responses, and the heat stress index (WBGTi) slightly increased despite a lower dry-bulb temperature. The study concludes that while passive architectural strategies can effectively protect against outdoor particulate pollution, they can inadvertently compromise natural cooling ventilation. These findings highlight the essential ventilation-filtration dilemma in tropical climates and underscore the necessity for integrated, balanced design approaches in sustainable housing retrofits to simultaneously ensure occupant health and thermal comfort.

---

Keywords :

Building Components, Housing Intervention, Indoor Air Quality, Particulate Matter., Thermal

---

References :

1. World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.
2. A. R. Susanti, B. Soemardiono, and P. W. Handayani, “Thermal Comfort Analysis of Traditional and Modern Housing in Tropical Coastal Areas,” J. Sustain. Dev., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 45–58, 2022.
3. M. K. Singh, S. Mahapatra, and J. K. Atreya, “A comparative study of pre- and post-retrofit building performance using a longitudinal data analysis approach,” Build. Res. \& Inf., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 501–519, 2020.
4. Government of Indonesia Ministry of Environment and Forestry, “National Ambient Air Quality Standards,” Indonesia, 2025.
5. J. L. Woods and A. T. M. S. Islam, “The effectiveness of passive design and retrofit strategies on indoor particulate matter reduction in residential buildings: A case study from Southeast Asia,” Indoor Built Environ., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1821–1837, 2022.
6. R. Gupta and M. Gregg, “Post-occupancy evaluation of low-carbon housing: A framework for linking occupant satisfaction with energy and environmental performance,” Energy Policy, vol. 162, pp. 27–82, 2022.
7. D. T. Campbell and J. C. Stanley, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, United States: Houghton Mifflin, 1963.
8. Suparwoko, A. S. Mutaqy, and E. Siswoyo, “Climate Adaptive House Study in Wunung, Wonosari, Gunungkidul, DIY,” Yogyakarta, 2025.

 

9. National Standardization Agency, “SNI 6390:2021 Method for Measuring Surface Temperature in Buildings,” 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia.
10. R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. United States: Sage Publications, 2018.
11. C. Chen and B. Zhao, “Review of relationship between indoor and outdoor particles: I/O ratio, infiltration factor and penetration factor,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 275–288, 2011.
12. Y. Epstein and D. S. Moran, “Thermal comfort and the heat stress indices,” Ind. Health, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 388–398, 2006.
13. T. R. Walsh, The Karst Landscapes of Gunungkidul: Geology and Environmental Significance. Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2019.
14. Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency (BMKG), “Climate Atlas of Gunungkidul Regency,” Jakarta, Indonesia, 2020.
15. P. J. A. de Dear, Adaptive Thermal Comfort in Natural Ventilated Buildings. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2020.
16. J. A. Clarke, Energy Simulation in Building Design, 2nd ed. Oxford, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001.
17. Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia (KLHK), “Regulation of the Minister of Environment and Forestry No. 14 of 2025 concerning National Ambient Air Quality Standards,” Jakarta, Indonesia, 2025.
18. W. W. Nazaroff, “Indoor particle dynamics,” Indoor Air, vol. 14, no. S7, pp. 175–183, 2004.
19. M. A. Humphreys and J. F. Nicol, “The validity of ISO-PMV for predicting comfort votes in everyday thermal environments,” Energy Build., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 667–684, 2002.
20. P. J. A. de Dear and G. S. Brager, “Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference,” ASHRAE Trans., vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 145–167, 1998.
21. A. R. F. Putra and B. D. K. Wardani, “Ventilation and indoor air quality trade-offs in tropical residential retrofits: A review,” Build. Environ., vol. 205, pp. 108–267, 2021.
22. M. Santamouris and D. Kolokotsa, Passive Cooling of Buildings. London, United Kingdom: Earthscan, 2013.
23. J. K. Leylekian and others, “Towards integrated design guidelines for healthy housing in tropical developing countries,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 87, pp. 41–82, 2022.