Abstract :

Sin taxes—selektif excise levies on goods like alcohol, tobacco and sugar‑sweetened beverages—are used to internalize negative externalities and self‑control problems. This bibliometric review analyzes 55 Scopus‑indexed publications from 1997–2024 identified through a systematic search for “sin tax” and “sin taxes” up to 26 December 2025 and filtered for scholarly, English‑language economics and finance works. Publication output grew from sporadic early contributions to a surge starting in 2013 and peaking at eleven papers in 2022. Authorship is dispersed (138 unique authors, only four with multiple papers), and output is geographically concentrated, with the United States producing nearly half of publications and Finland, Italy and the United Kingdom contributing smaller shares. Keyword clustering highlights themes around optimal tax design, consumption behaviour, obesity, pass‑through and paternalism, reflecting intersections between public finance, behavioural economics and health policy. The field is expanding but remains geographically skewed, signalling the need for more research in developing countries, greater interdisciplinary collaboration and deeper exploration of new sin goods and long‑term health and fiscal effects.

---

Keywords :

Bibliometric Analysis, corrective taxation, Health policy., sin tax

---

References :

1. Abrardi, L., & Cambini, C. (2019). Incentivizing self-control effort. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 164, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.05.030
2. Allcott, H., Lockwood, B. B., & Taubinsky, D. (2019). Regressive sin taxes, with an application to the optimal soda tax. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(3), 1557–1626. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz017
3. Antonelli, M. A., Castaldo, A., de Bonis, V., & Gandolfo, A. (2022). Optimal taxation of sin goods: An analytical review. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 37(2), 232–259. https://doi.org/10.1332/251569121X16571984676251
4. Barnes, B. G., Gramlich, J., & Lee, J. E. (2023). The influence of campaign contribution disclosure on voter support for tax initiatives: Evidence from Washington’s “Keep Groceries Affordable Act of 2018.” Accounting and the Public Interest, 23(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.2308/API-2022-001
5. Bate, R., Kallen, C., & Mathur, A. (2020). The perverse effect of sin taxes: The rise of illicit white cigarettes. Applied Economics, 52(8), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1646403
6. Black, P. A., & Mohamed, A. I. (2006). “Sin” taxes and poor households: Unanticipated effects. South African Journal of Economics, 74(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2006.00053.x
7. Bollinger, B., & Sexton, S. E. (2023). Local excise taxes, sticky prices, and spillovers: Evidence from Berkeley’s soda tax. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 21(2), 281–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-023-09263-y
8. Bryan, G., Karlan, D., & Nelson, S. (2010). Commitment devices. Annual Review of Economics, 2, 671–698. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124324
9. Burlacu, S., Kazemekaityte, A., Ronzani, P., & Savadori, L. (2022). Blinded by worries: Sin taxes and demand for temptation under financial worries. Theory and Decision, 92(1), 141–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-021-09820-5
10. Calcott, P. (2022). Regulating ingredients in sin goods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104(3), 1120–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12264
11. Cohen, E., de Fonseka, J., & McGowan, R. (2017). Caloric sweetened beverage taxes: A toothless solution? Economists’ Voice, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2017-0009
12. Conlon, C., Rao, N., & Wang, Y. (2024). Who pays sin taxes? Understanding the overlapping burdens of corrective taxes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 106(6), 1719–1729. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01235
13. Dadayan, L. (2019). States’ addiction to sins: Sin tax fallacy. National Tax Journal, 72(4), 723–754. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2019.4.04
14. Delmotte, C., & Dold, M. (2022). Dynamic preferences and the behavioral case against sin taxes. Constitutional Political Economy, 33(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-021-09328-8
15. Gehrsitz, M., Saffer, H., & Grossman, M. (2021). The effect of changes in alcohol tax differentials on alcohol consumption. Journal of Public Economics, 204, 104520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104520
16. Haavio, M., & Kotakorpi, K. (2011). The political economy of sin taxes. European Economic Review, 55(4), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.06.002
17. Haavio, M., & Kotakorpi, K. (2016). Sin licences revisited. Journal of Public Economics, 144, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.09.006
18. Hovhannisyan, V., Heboyan, V., & Kondaridze, M. (2024). An empirical assessment of effectiveness of the US tobacco control policies: A smoothed instrumental variables quantile regression approach. Empirical Economics, 67(2), 465–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02562-7
19. Hoy, K. A., & Wrenn, D. H. (2020). The effectiveness of taxes in decreasing candy purchases. Economics Letters, 187, 108853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.108853
20. Jones‑Smith, J. C., Knox, M. A., Coe, N. B., Pinero Walkinshaw, L. P., Schoof, J., Hamilton, D., Hurvitz, P. M., & Krieger, J. (2022). Sweetened beverage taxes: Economic benefits and costs according to household income. Food Policy, 110, 102277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102277
21. Kalamov, Z. Y., & Runkel, M. (2022). Taxation of unhealthy food consumption and the intensive versus extensive margin of obesity. International Tax and Public Finance, 29(5), 1294–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-021-09704-y
22. Kenchington, D. G., Shohfi, T. D., Smith, J. D., & White, R. M. (2022). Do sin tax hikes spur cheating in interpersonal exchange? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 96, 101281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101281
23. Kim, K. (2022). Using dynamic common correlated effects approach to analyze the role of sin taxes in short- and long-term fiscal surplus across US states. Public Budgeting and Finance, 42(2), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12313
24. Kotakorpi, K. (2008). The incidence of sin taxes. Economics Letters, 98(1), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.04.012
25. Li, W., & Dorfman, J. H. (2019). The implications of heterogeneous habit in consumer beverage purchases on soda and sin taxes. Food Policy, 84, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.03.003
26. O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Studying optimal paternalism, illustrated by a model of sin taxes. American Economic Review, 93(2), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947029
27. O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2006). Optimal sin taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 90(10–11), 1825–1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.12.003
28. Prieger, J. E. (2023). Optimal taxation of cigarettes and e‑cigarettes: Principles for taxing reduced-harm tobacco products. Forum for Health Economics and Policy, 26(2), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2022-0025
29. Rees‑Jones, A., & Rozema, K. (2023). Price isn’t everything: Behavioral response around changes in sin taxes. National Tax Journal, 76(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/723093
30. Schmacker, R., & Smed, S. (2023). Sin taxes and self-control. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 15(3), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200479
31. Seiler, S., Tuchman, A., & Yao, S. (2021). The impact of soda taxes: Pass‑through, tax avoidance, and nutritional effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720969401
32. Thayyib, P. V., Anwar, I., Sulphey, S., Yasin, N., & Yahya, A. (2024). Brand expertise, impulsiveness and materialism aggravate unhealthy food products buying among young adults despite pricing and sin tax interventions. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2296147
33. Wang, J., Marsiliani, L., & Renström, T. (2020). Optimal sin taxes in the presence of income taxes and health care. Economics Letters, 186, 108767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108767