Abstract :

Indonesia’s industrial sector stands as the cornerstone of the national economy, yet it faces escalating challenges from intense global competition. To sustain growth and competitiveness, there is an urgent need for a strategic enhancement of the sector’s internal support systems. This policy paper identifies a critical structural weakness within this ecosystem: the absence of a standardized quality assurance mechanism for Industrial Management Consulting Services (JKMI). The current lack of regulation creates significant market uncertainty, hinders effective decision-making for industrial clients, and places a ceiling on the nation’s industrial potential.

To address this gap, this paper proposes a decisive regulatory intervention: the issuance of a Minister of Industry Regulation mandating business entity certification for all JKMI providers. The validity of this proposal is underpinned by a comprehensive Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) and a detailed Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). These evaluations rigorously compared the proposed regulatory framework against the status quo. The findings are unequivocal, demonstrating that the regulation offers substantial net benefits. It promises to provide industries with reliable and competent partners, incentivize consulting entities to invest in quality standards, and equip the government with superior tools for policy development.

Translating these findings into action, the paper concludes with four strategic recommendations. First, it urges the immediate finalization of the regulation to establish legal certainty. Second, it calls for a robust implementation framework for certification and classification. Third, a managed transition plan is recommended to accommodate existing entities. Finally, the paper advises executing strategic socialization and inter-agency coordination to ensure widespread adoption, thereby securing the long-term reliability of Indonesia’s industrial support infrastructure.

---

Keywords :

Certification, Consulting, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Industry, Regulation.

---

References :

1. Government of The Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2014 concerning Industry. Jakarta: State Secretariat.
2. Government of The Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Risk-Based Business Licensing. Jakarta: State Secretariat.
3. Government of The Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 74 of 2022 concerning National Industrial Policy for 2020 – 2024. Jakarta: State Secretariat.
4. Government of The Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2022 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Legislation. Jakarta: State Secretariat.
5. Ministry of Industry of The Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Regulation of the Minister of Industry Number 9 of 2021 concerning Standards for Business Activities and/or Products in the Implementation of Risk-Based Business Licensing in the Industrial Sector. Jakarta: Ministry of Industry.
6. Ministry of Industry of The Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Decree of the Minister of Industry concerning the Determination of Indonesian National Work Competency Standards for the Consulting Services Category in the Industrial Management Consulting Sub-sector. Jakarta: Ministry of Industry.
7. National Development Planning Agency of Indonesia (BAPPENAS). (2021). Guidelines for the Development and Implementation of Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) Methods in Indonesia. Jakarta: BAPPENAS.
8. Central Statistics Agency of Indonesia (BPS). (2024). Large and Medium Industry Statistics 2023. Jakarta: BPS.
9. Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs. (2023).Monitoring and Evaluation Report on the Implementation of Risk-Based Business Licensing (OSS-RBA).Jakarta: Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs.
10. Ministry of Industry. (2023).Industrial Human Resources Development Roadmap 2020-2035. Jakarta: Ministry of Industry.
11. Wicaksono, D. A. (2023). Quo Vadis Pengaturan Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Cendekia, 15(2), 145-160.
12. Retnosari, A., & Syaif, H. R. A. (2024). Penerapan Regulatory Impact Assessment dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Suatu Kewajiban atau Saran?. Cakrawala, 18(1), 143–153.
13. OECD. (2021). OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2021. Paris: OECD Publishing.
14. Radaelli, C. M. (2017). The New Politics of Regulatory Reform: Regulatory Impact Assessment and the Shift to Evidence-Based Policy. Journal of Public Policy, 37(2), 209–232.
15. Salsabila, N. (2022). Analisis Komparatif Model RIA: Tinjauan Penerapan di Berbagai Negara dan Potensinya di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 13(1), 1-18.
16. Dwiyanto, A. (2019). Manajemen dan Reformasi Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
17. Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
18. Riyadi, F. H. (2020). Kajian Biaya Kepatuhan (Cost of Compliance) dalam Penyusunan Regulasi di Sektor Industri. Jakarta: Pustaka Reformasi Kebijakan.
19. Soedarsono, B., & Mawardi, M. S. (2009). Regulatory Impact Assessments and The Private Sector in Indonesia. Jakarta: Senada.
20. Nugroho, R. (2021). Kebijakan Publik di Indonesia: Reformasi Tata Kelola Regulasi. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
21. KPPOD. (2023). Jangan Salah Langkah dalam Menyusun Kebijakan: Kenali Metode Regulatory Impact Assessment. Artikel Daring KPPOD.
22. Lasmidin. (2022). Peran Stakeholder Consultation dalam Optimalisasi Hasil Regulatory Impact Assessment. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan, 8(2), 56-72.
23. Majone, G. (2016). Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
24. Harsono, W., & Saputra, D. (2024). Analisis Dampak Ekonomi Regulasi Sertifikasi Usaha terhadap Sektor Jasa Konsultansi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, 5(1), 10-25.
25. Mubarok, M. (2021). Policy Design and Evaluation: A Framework for Good Governance. Bandung: Alfabeta.
26. Kusmindari, C. D., Arsi, F., Laila, W., et al. (2025). MANAJEMEN INDUSTRI. Medan: CV WIDINA MEDIA UTAMA.
27. Tjiptono, F., & Diana, A. (2022). Total Quality Management: Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
28. Siahaya, W. (2019). Sukses Supply Chain Management Akses Demand Chain Management. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
29. Puspitasari, I. (2023). Peran Konsultan Manajemen dalam Peningkatan Efisiensi Operasional Industri Manufaktur. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 20(3), 201-215.
30. Rahardjo, S., & Santoso, Y. (2024). Pengaruh Kompetensi Konsultan terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Industri. Jurnal Manajemen dan Logistik, 8(1), 17-31.
31. Saragih, T. (2022). Sertifikasi Kompetensi Profesi: Standar Kualitas Jasa di Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
32. Maister, D. H. (2018). Managing the Professional Service Firm. New York: Free Press.
33. Sugiyono. (2023). Analisis Kebutuhan Standarisasi dan Sertifikasi Usaha Jasa Konsultansi: Perspektif Pelaku Industri. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, 14(2), 110-125.
34. Suryadi, I., & Hasanah, N. (2021). Dampak Regulasi Terhadap Kualitas Layanan Konsultan Industri di Era Industri 4.0. Jurnal Kebijakan Industri, 4(2), 85-100.
35. Ramadhan, R. (2024). Konsultansi Manajemen Strategis untuk Keunggulan Kompetitif Industri. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
36. Wahyudi, B. (2023). Model Peningkatan Kualitas Jasa Konsultansi Melalui Mekanisme Sertifikasi Usaha. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 10(3), 160-175.
37. Sembiring, J. (2022). Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Persaingan Usaha dalam Regulasi Sertifikasi Jasa Konsultansi. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 9(1), 45-60.
38. Hadiguna, R. A., & Setiawan, H. (2018). Tata Letak Pabrik. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
39. Nasution, M. N. (2021). Manajemen Mutu Terpadu (TQM): Konsep dan Implementasi di Sektor Jasa. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.