Abstract :

This course-based inquiry, situated within the interpretivist paradigm, explored how child and youth care (CYC) students at MacEwan University perceive their learning environment. A purposive non-probability sampling strategy was used to recruit participants from all four years of the CYC program. A triangulated data-collection approach was used to ensure the credibility and trustworthiness of the findings by drawing on multiple data-sources. Participants were given the option to participate in an online survey or an online interview. Both options included an art-based activity component. Four overarching themes were identified during the thematic analysis: (a) a peaceful shore, a place to anchor; b) together we stand, united we thrive; c) we share this theatre together; and d) taught me to be open and cry without flinching.

---

Keywords :

Child and youth care, Course-based research, learning Environment, Qualitative, Students

---

References :

1. Allyn, D. A. (2013). Course-based undergraduate research: It can be accomplished! Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 84(9), 32–
2. Barone, T. (2012). Arts-based research. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 29–32). Sage Publications Inc.
3. Bellefeuille, G., & Berikoff, A. (2020). 21st century child and youth care education: An ontological relational turn in teaching and learning. Research Journal of Education, 6(3), 14-24.
4. Bellefeuille, G., Ekdhal, C., Kent, L. & Kluczny, M. (2014). A course-based creative inquiry approach to teaching introductory research methods in child and youth care undergraduate education. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(2), 1-9.
5. Bellefeuille, G., Heaney-Dalton, K., & Stiller, R. (2024). Relational-centered arts-based teaching and learning: Engaging body, mind, & soul. A primer for child and youth care educators. CYC-Net Press.
6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.
7. Braun, , Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C.(2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654
8. Cotten, S., & Wilson, B. (2006). Student-faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education, 51(4), 487-519.
9. Chilton G., Gerber N., & Scotti V. (2015). Towards an aesthetic intersubjective paradigm for arts-based research: an art therapy perspective. UNESCO Observatory Multi-Disciplinary Journal in the Arts, 5(1), 1-27.
10. Cotten, S.R., Wilson, B. (2006). Student–faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education51, 487–519.
11. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage Publications, Inc
12. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131.
14. Dwyer, T. (2017). Persistence in higher education through student-faculty interactions in the classroom of a commuter institution. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 54(4), 325-334.
15. Fuentes, M., Ruiz Alvarado, A., Berdan, J., & DeAngelo, L. (2014). Mentorship matters: Does early faculty contact lead to quality faculty interaction? Research in Higher Education, 55(3), 288-307.
16. Harrison, M., Dunbar, D., Ratmansky, L., Boyd, K. & Lopatto, D. (2010). Classroom-based science research at the introductory level: Changes in career choices and attitude. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 279–
17. Lim, W. M. (2024). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199-229.
18. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Journal Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27-52.
19. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Pervin, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2022). The interpretivist research paradigm: A subjective notion of a social context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 419-428.
21. Rehman, A.A. & Alharthi, K. (2016). An introduction to research paradigms. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3, 51-59.