Abstract :

Problems faced in science learning at SDN Kutorenon 01 include suboptimal student learning outcomes, weak critical thinking skills, teachers being the center of learning, limited use of textbooks as teaching materials, and the use of less innovative learning models and media. Therefore, this study aims to examine the effect of the Cooperative Group Investigation Model accompanied by Flashcards on the learning outcomes and critical thinking of third-grade students in the subject of science. This study is an experimental study (True Experimental) using Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design with third-grade students of SDN Kutorenon 01. The measuring instrument used is a test, which is expressed in the form of scores obtained from the results of the students’ pretest and posttest. Data analysis uses a t-test or independent sample test with the help of SPSS 27 for Windows software. The results of the data analysis show that the learning outcomes and critical thinking of students in the experimental class are higher than those in the control class. This is supported by the hypothesis test calculations, which state that student learning outcomes reached a significance value (2-tailed) of 0.000 and critical thinking skills reached a significance value (2-tailed) of 0.000, both less than 0.05. This proves a difference in the average learning outcomes and critical thinking skills of students in the experimental and control classes. Thus, it can be concluded that the cooperative investigation-type group model assisted by flashcards has a significant influence on the learning outcomes and critical thinking skills of third-grade science students.

---

Keywords :

Critical Thinking, Flashcards, Group Investigation, Learning Outcomes

---

References :

1. Arikunto, (2020). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekaatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
2. Darmawan, P.A.,&Sujoko, E.(2013). Revisi taksonomi pembelaajaran benyamin s. bloom. Satya Widya, 29(1), 30-39.
3. Dimyati dan (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
4. Facione, A. (2011). Critical Thingking: What it is and why it counts. Insight assessment, 1(1), 1-23
5. INDONESIA, R. (2006). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional.
6. Iskandar, , Rosmana, P. S., Farhatunnisa, G., Mayanti, I., Apriliya, M., & Gustavisiana, T. S. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Di Sekolah Dasar. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2), 2322-2336.
7. Lismaya, (2019). Berpikir Kritis & PBL:(Problem Based Learning). Media Sahabat Cendekia.
8. Lai, R. (2011) Critical thingking: A literature review. Person’s Research Reports, 6(1),40-41.
9. Nasution, I. S. (2018). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas Vi Di Sd Muhammadiyah 12 Paedagoria | FKIP UMMat, 8(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v8i2.66
10. Masyhud, S. (2016) Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Jember:iLembaga Pengembangan Manajemen dan Profesi Kependidikan.
11. Munawwarah, , Laili, N & Tohir, M. (2020) Ketrampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika berdasarkan ketrampilan abad 21. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan pembelajaran Matematika, 2 (1), 37-58.
12. Novita, , & Sundari, F. S. (2020). Peningkatan hasil belajar siswa menggunakan media game ular tangga digital. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(3), 716-724.
13. Rachmanto, A. R. D. I. A. N. (2019). Proses berpikir kritis siswa dalam pemecahan masalah pola bilangan berdasarkan kerangka kerja Norris dan Skripsi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya Fakultas Tarbiyah: tidak diterbitkan.
14. Rifa’i, , & Sartika, N. S. (2018). Penerapan Pembelajaran Investigasi Kelompok terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematis
15. Siswa Sekolah Menengah Jurnal Analisa, 4(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v4i1.1960
16. Siti, 2022. Model-model Pembelajaran.Malang: CV Litersi Nusantara Abadi.
17. Silva, , Lopes, J., Morais, E., & Dominguez, C. (2023). Fostering critical and creative thinking through the cooperative learning jigsaw and group investigation. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 261-282.
18. Salam, , & Kaharuddin, K. (2022). PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION. Kreatif: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan Agama Islam, 20(2), 101-112.
19. Suciono, , Rasto, R., & Ahman, E. (2020). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Ekonomi Era Revolusi 4.0. SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 17(1), 48-56.
20. Viqri, , Gesta, L., Rozi, M. F., Syafitri, A., Falah, A. M., Khoirunnisa, K., & Risdalina, R. (2024). Problematika Pembelajaran IPAS dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Inovasi, Evaluasi Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran (JIEPP), 4(2), 310-315.
21. Wiratana, I. K., Sadia, W., & Suma, K. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Investigasi Kelompok (Group Investigation) Terhadap Keterampilan Proses dan Hasil Belajar Sains Siswa Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA, 3(1), 1–12.a
22. Perwitasari, R.S., Sumarmi, & Amirudin, A. 2016. Pengaruh Group Investigation Berbasis Outdoor Study Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan 1(3), 87-93. Dari http://journal.um.ac.id-/index.php/jptpp-/article/view/6107.
23. Maryanto, I. P. dan I. A. W. C. (2019). Penggunaan Media Flascard untuk Meningkatkan Pengenalan Bentuk Huruf Siswa Kelas I pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah ABC Manado. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
24. Rosiyani, I., Salamah dan Anggraini, S. (2024). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi dalam Kurikulum Merdeka pada Pembelajaran Ipas Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(3), 10-10.
25. Wulandari, , Skor PISA Indonesia ditarget setara negara OECD, Diaspora RI Usul belajar ini. detikEdu. Jumat, 20 desember 2024 09.00 wib.