Abstract :

: This study investigates the grammatical properties of analytic passive constructions in two languages: the bakat passive in Balinese and the kena passive in Indonesian. Although Indonesian kena passive has received substantial attention in prior work, the Balinese bakat passive remains largely underexamined. This research provides the first detailed description and analysis of bakat passive, addressing a significant gap in Balinese grammatical research. For kena passive, despite the availability of basic descriptions, recent studies of comparable constructions in languages such as Mandarin and Vietnamese underscore the need for a renewed analytical perspective. Incorporating these insights, this study proposes an updated analysis of Indonesian kena passive aligned with the depth and rigor of current cross-linguistic research.

The study primarily employs elicitation, involving regular sessions with native speakers to obtain grammaticality judgments, semantic interpretations, and other linguistic data. Additional evidence from Balinese and Indonesian corpora is used to test and refine the proposed hypotheses. The findings show that bakat passive and kena passive function as auxiliary verbs marking noncanonical passive constructions. Both encode “non-intentional” meaning through specific combinations with verbal roots of corresponding lemmas. They can also co-occur with canonical passive markers -a in Balinese and di- in Indonesian. These results advance our understanding of passive structure and syntactic organization in natural language.

---

Keywords :

Balinese, grammar, Indonesian, Linguistics, passive

---

References :

1. Alexiadou, Artemis & Doron, Edit. (2012). The syntactic construction of two non-active Voices: passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48(1). 1–34.
2. Alexiadou, A. (2012). ‘Noncanonical passives revisited: Parameters of Nonactive Voice’. Linguistics: 50 (6) 1079-1 DOI: 10.1515/ling-2012-0036
3. Alexiadou, A. & Schäfer, F. (eds). (2013). Non-canonical passives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company
4. Artawa, Ketut. The basic verb construction in Balinese. In Alexander Adelaar (ed.) Voice variation in Austronesian languages of Indonesia. NUSA 54: 5−27.
5. Blust, Robert & Stephen Trussel. 2010. The Austronesian comparative dictionary: Web Updated 21 June 2020. http://www.trussel2.com/acd/ (accessed 2 May 2024).
6. Bruening, Benjamin and Thuan Tran. 2015. The nature of the passive, with an analysis of Vietnamese. Lingua 165: 133−172.
7. Chung, Sandra. (1976). An Object Creating Rule in Bahasa Indonesia in Linguistic Inquiry, 7 (1):41 -87.
8. Davies, William D. 1995. Javanese adversatives, passives, and mapping theory. J. Linguistics 31. 15-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700000554
9. Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka and Alexander D.   2024.  On the syntax of the analytical passive in Kenyah. Paper presented at the first International Symposium on Bornean Linguistics.
10. Hasko, Victoria.   Qualitative Corpus Analysis in the Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Chapell, Carol A (ed). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell
11. Huang, James C.-T.   Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29: 423−509.
12. Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2005. A Student’s Introduction to English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. Legate, J. A. (2012). Subjects in Acehnese and the nature of the passive. Language 88 (3): 495–525
14. Legate, J. A. (2021). Noncanonical Passives: A Typology of Voices in an Impoverished Universal Grammar in Annual Review of Linguistics, 7: 7.1 – 7.20
15. Nomoto, Hiroki and Kartin Abd. Waha  2011.  Konstruksi  kena  dalam Bahasa Indonesia: Perbandingan dengan bahasa Melayu. Linguistik Indonesia 29(2): 111−131
16. Nomoto, Hiroki and Kartini Wahab. 2012. Kena adversative passives in Malay, funny control, and covert voice alternation. Oceanic Linguistics 51(2): 360−386.
17. Nomoto, Hiroki. 2024. Bunsekitekijudoubun no ruikei nikansuru shiron: Tounanajia no gengo o chuushin ni [A preliminary analysis of the typology of analytical passives: With   a focus on Southeast Asian languages]. Paper presented at the 169th Meeting of the
18. Nomoto, Hiroki. 2018. The development of the English-type passive in Balinese in Wacana, 19 (1): 149-
19. Nomoto, Hiroki (unpublished). 2021. Overlooked bare voice constructions in Westren Austronesian in NUSA, 71: 1-18.
20. Patrianto, Hero and Victoria Che To appear. Rethinking Indonesian-type passives: Lessons from Javanese.  Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 53). Amherst, MA: GSLA.Linguistic Society of Japan (LSJ).
21. Potts, Christophe 2005. The Logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press
22. Quirk, Randolph, Sydney Greenbaum, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Lon
23. Quirk, Randolph, Sydney Greenbaum, and Jan Svartvik. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English Essex: Longman
24. Reed, L. A. (2011). Get-pasives in The Linguistic Review (28): 41-78. DOI:10.1515/t2011.022
25. Sneddon, James Neil, Alexander K. Adelaar, Dwi N. Djenar and Michael Ewing. 2010. Indonesian: A comprehensive gramma 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
26. Sudarya 2015. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.
27. Sutjaja, I Gusti Made. Tuttle concise Balinese dictionary.  Tokyo:  TUTTLE  Publishing.
28. Udayana, I Ny 2002. The Indonesian di –passive and discourse context. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 13 (6) 1304-1312.
29. Udayana, I Ny 2013. Voice and Reflexives in Balinese. University of Texas Ph.D. Dissertation
30. Udayana, I Ny 2020. Nasalization in Balinese Verbs. Aksara, 32 (2): 339 – 348. DOI: 10.29255/Aksara.V32ii1.643.339-348

31. Udayana, I Nyoman, Gede Primahadi Wijaya Rajeg, and Ida Ayu Made Pu 2025. The (non)canonical status of the ka– passive in Balinese in Linguistics Vanguard. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2023-0122