Abstract :

This research aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of four anionic surfactants—Alpha Olefin Sulfonate (AOS), Ammonium Lauryl Sulfate (ALS), Alkyl Benzene Sulfonate (ABS), and Methyl Ester Sulfonate (MES)—for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) applications in sandstone reservoirs. Experiments were conducted using five surfactant concentrations (0.5%, 0.7%, 0.9%, 1.1%, and 1.3%), a fixed brine salinity of 9000 ppm, and two temperature conditions (60°C and 80°C).

Physical fluid properties including density, specific gravity, and viscosity were characterized for each surfactant solution. Results demonstrate that increasing surfactant concentration raises both density and viscosity, while increasing temperature tends to decrease these values. Phase behavior tests showed that AOS and ALS were capable of forming stable microemulsions (Winsor III) at 1.3% concentration across both temperatures, whereas ABS and MES formed microemulsions only at 60°C and higher concentrations, with a notable decline in performance at 80°C.

Interfacial tension (IFT) measurements identified ALS as the most effective, reducing IFT to the optimal range for EOR (<0.01 dyne/cm), outperforming AOS, ABS, and MES. Core flooding tests further validated ALS, which delivered the highest increase in oil recovery factor (RF), achieving a 30.83% increment at 1.3% concentration and 60°C. MES followed as a promising alternative, contributing approximately a 5% RF increase under the same conditions, while AOS and ABS yielded lower enhancements.

The study concludes that selection of surfactant type, concentration, and operational temperature critically influences oil recovery efficiency. ALS is identified as the most effective surfactant under the tested conditions, with MES offering additional environmental benefits and solid EOR performance at moderate temperatures. Future research is recommended to explore surfactant-polymer combinations, varied salinity scenarios, and field-scale validations to optimize EOR strategies for mature oil reservoirs.

---

Keywords :

ABS Surfactant, ALS Surfactant, AOS Surfactant, MES Surfactant, Recovery Factor (RF)

---

References :

1. Ahmad, M., & Idris, S. (2015). Surfactant flooding in enhanced oil recovery: A review. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 135, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.07.018.
2. Alagorni, A. H., Yaacob, Z. Bin, dan Nour, A. H. (2015): An Overview of Oil Production Stages: Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques and Nitrogen Injection, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 6(9), 693–701. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2015.v6.682.
3. Ansyori, M. R. (2018). Mengenal Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Sebagai Solusi Meningkatkan Produksi Minyak. Swara Patra, 8(2), 16-22. http://ejurnal.ppsdmmigas.esdm.go.id/sp/index.php/swarapatra/article/view/25.
4. (2019). Potensi Peningkatan Produksi Minyak Bumi Dengan Chemical Eor Melalui Pemanfaatan Surfaktan Berbasis Minyak Kelapa Sawit. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pembelajarannya (SNKP), 185-191.
5. Fathi, , & Jafari, S. (2019). Microemulsion formation using anionic surfactants in the recovery of crude oil from sandstone reservoirs. Petroleum Science and Technology, 37(11), 1186-1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2019.1609543.
6. Hani, , & Martanto, T. (2020). Pengaruh surfaktan anionik ABS dan MES dalam meningkatkan recovery factor di reservoir sandstone. Jurnal Teknik Perminyakan, 45(3), 204-214. https://doi.org/10.21772/jtp.45.3.204.
7. Isaac, O. T., Pu, H., Oni, B. A., dan Samson, F. A. (2022): Surfactants employed in conventional and unconventional reservoirs for enhanced oil recovery—A review, Energy Reports, 8, 2806–2830. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2022.01.187.

8. Kang, M., & Lee, K. (2018). Characterization of anionic surfactants in enhanced oil recovery processes: Stability and performance. Fuel, 217, 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.040.
9. Kesuma, W. P. & Kasmungin, S. (2015). Studi Laboratorium Pengaruh Konsentrasi Surfaktan terhadap Peningktan Perolehan Minyak. Seminar Nasional Cendikiawan, ISBN: 2460, 569-575.
10. Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2017). Enhanced oil recovery from sandstone cores using Alkyl Benzene Sulfonate (ABS) Energy & Fuels, 31(12), 13021-13028. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02068.

11. Makky, & Kasmungin, S. (2019). Peningkatan Perolehan Minyak Dengan Optimalisasi Proyek Cyclic Steam Stimulation Menggunakan Metode Simulasi Reservoir Di Lapangan-X, Sentral Sumatera. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), pp. 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
12. Pauhesti, P., Kasmungin, S., & Hartono, K.F. (2017). Uji Laboratorium Untuk Meningkatkan Perolehan Minyak Menggunakan Injeksi Surfaktan AOS Konsentrasi RendahUji Laboratorium Untuk Meningkatkan Perolehan Minyak Menggunakan Injeksi Surfaktan AOS Konsentrasi Rendah. Jurnal Petro 2017, 66-70.
13. Riazi, M., & Sadeghi, M. (2017). Effect of surfactant concentration on oil recovery from sandstone reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Engineering, 2017, Article ID 7365708. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7365708.
14. Ristawati, , Setiati, R., & Kasmungin, S. 2018. Pengaruh Konsentrasi Surfaktan Nals Ampastebu dan Salinitas Tinggi pada Hasil Uji Kelakuan Fasa. Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan Ke 4 Tahun 2018. 111-115.
15. Rivai, , Tedja Irawadi, T., Suryani, A., Setyaningsih, D., Penelitian Surfaktan dan Bioenergi, P., Pertanian Bogor Kampus IPB Baranangsiang, L.-I., dan Raya Pajajaran No, J. (1997): Perbaikan Proses Produksi Surfaktan Metil.
16. Solikha, D. F., dan Haryanti, R. (2021): Pre Screening Surfaktan untuk Injeksi Chemical EOR di Lapangan X, Gema Wiralodra, 12(1), 95–109.
17. Tsai, S., & Chen, (2016). Evaluation of anionic surfactant flooding in sandstone oil reservoirs: Alkyl Benzene Sulfonate and Methyl Ester Sulfonate. Journal of Petroleum Engineering and Technology, 64(2), 158-165.
18. Yadav, R., & Suri, M. (2016). Recovery factor improvement by surfactant flooding in sandstone reservoirs: A comparative study of anionic and non-ionic surfactants. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, Article ID 3415398. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3415398.
19. Yanti, , Kasmungin, S., Adawiyah, R. dan Kolanus, B. (2017). Laboratory Study Of Salinity And Surfactant Concentration Effects On Oil Recovery. EDP Sciences : Matec Web of Conferences, 101, 02008.
20. Yulia, S., Kasmungin, S., & Fathaddin, M.T. (2017). Kajian Laboratorium Mengenai Pengaruh Salinitas, Jenis Surfaktan Dan Konsentrasi Surfaktan Terhadap Recovery Factor Dalam Sistem Injeksi Surfaktan Untuk Batuan Karbonat. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan, 225-233.
21. Zhang, Y., & Liu, H. (2014). Surfactant-enhanced oil recovery from sandstone cores: A laboratory study. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 66(12), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.2118/169058-PA.