Abstract :

Introduction: The use of Electronic cigarettes and Vapes have been widely accepted as a less-harmful means of smoking when compared to cigarettes. While this is true, the adverse effects and harms of E-cigarettes and Vaping are not inconsequential.

Methods: We searched the PubMed database exclusively for Randomized controlled trials, while limiting our search between 2007 – 2023. We initially identified 234 articles from PubMed which were then screened by abstract. Articles were screened for relevance based on the topic of E-cigarettes or Vaping and of adverse effects. Exclusion of 205 studies left 29 full-text articles to assess. Assessing based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria left 6 studies eligible for systematic analysis. Data extraction was performed on each study with focus on baseline demographics and covariates. Using the Jadad-scale, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of each study on a 5 point scale. It was found that 1 study was of poor quality, 4 studies were of moderate quality and 1 study was of good quality.

Results: 6 RCTs were included in the analysis with 4 being performed in the United States, 1 in Italy and 1 in Canada. A total of 137 participants were included in the randomized controlled trials published between 2015 and 2021. Acute vaping indicated a positive correlation and dose-response relationship with an increase in CD14, CD16, T-cells, natural killers and monocytes. Furthermore, the findings from the review suggests that EC usage alters expression of the transcriptome in both small airway epithelium (SAE) and alveolar macrophages (AM).

However, acute electronic cigarette use does not affect lung and heart functions as long as they do not contain nicotine.

Discussion: This systematic review was conducted using Randomized controlled trials, which minimizes bias and adjusts for confounding, with a robust internal validity. Randomization also provides the best means for determining a causal relationship between an intervention and outcome. However the average quality of the included studies are not of good quality and sample size (137 subjects) may be considered quite small and not representative. Database for studies included was limited to only Pubmed. Moreover health-care practitioners must also actively inquire about the recreational use of vapes in youth and adults, as they are becoming popularized due to the misconception of having few harmful effects.

Conclusion: Acute use of electronic cigarettes show a significant increase in inflammatory cell and cytokine release, leading to oxidative stress, potential airway remodeling and DNA damage. It was found that acute E-cigarette usage also decreases FEV₁, however these changes were not clinically significant towards pulmonary function and cardiac function tests. While this study only assesses the acute effects of electronic cigarette vape usage, further studies must be conducted on the chronic usage of E-cigarettes and their clinical effects.

---

Keywords :

Adverse effect, E-cigarette, Inflammation, systematic review., Vape, Vaping.

---

References :

1. Dinardo P, Rome ES. Vaping: The new wave of nicotine addiction. Cleve Clin J Med [Internet]. 2019;86(12):789–98. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.86a.19118
2. Pike JR, Tan N, Miller S, Cappelli C, Xie B, Stacy AW. The effect of E-cigarette commercials on youth smoking: A prospective study. Am J Health Behav [Internet]. 2019;43(6):1103–18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.43.6.8
3. Chapter 7. Table 8.2. Robbins Basic Pathology. 2018;306–7.
4. Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA. Propylene glycol. Dermatitis [Internet]. 2018;29(1):3–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/der.0000000000000315
5. Augestad KM, Berntsen G, Lassen K, Bellika JG, Wootton R, Lindsetmo RO, et al. Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in medical informatics: a systematic review of CONSORT adherence in RCTs on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc [Internet]. 2012;19(1):13–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000411
6. Ferrari M, Zanasi A, Nardi E, Morselli Labate AM, Ceriana P, Balestrino A, et al. Short-term effects of a nicotine-free e-cigarette compared to a traditional cigarette in smokers and non-smokers. BMC Pulm Med [Internet]. 2015;15(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0106-z
7. Gonzalez JE, Cooke WH. Acute effects of electronic cigarettes on arterial pressure and peripheral sympathetic activity in young nonsmokers. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol [Internet]. 2021;320(1):H248–55. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00448.2020
8. Song M-A, Reisinger SA, Freudenheim JL, Brasky TM, Mathé EA, McElroy JP, et al. Effects of Electronic cigarette constituents on the human lung: A pilot clinical trial. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) [Internet]. 2020;13(2):145–52. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-19-0400
9. Kelesidis T, Tran E, Nguyen R, Zhang Y, Sosa G, Middlekauff HR. Association of 1 vaping session with cellular oxidative stress in otherwise healthy young people with no history of smoking or vaping: A randomized clinical crossover trial. JAMA Pediatr [Internet]. 2021;175(11):1174. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2351
10. Staudt MR, Salit J, Kaner RJ, Hollmann C, Crystal RG. Altered lung biology of healthy never smokers following acute inhalation of E-cigarettes. Respir Res [Internet]. 2018;19(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0778-z
11. Boulay M-È, Henry C, Bossé Y, Boulet L-P, Morissette MC. Acute effects of nicotine-free and flavour-free electronic cigarette use on lung functions in healthy and asthmatic individuals. Respir Res [Internet]. 2017;18(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-017-0518-9
12. Wikipedia contributors. Juul [Internet]. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 2022. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juul&oldid=1127680124
13. Ali FRM, Diaz MC, Vallone D, Tynan MA, Cordova J, Seaman EL, et al. E-cigarette unit sales, by product and flavor type — United States, 2014–2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2020;69(37):1313–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6937e2
14. Alzahrani T, Pena I, Temesgen N, Glantz SA. Association between electronic cigarette use and myocardial infarction. Am J Prev Med [Internet]. 2018;55(4):455–61. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.004
15. Prochaska JJ, Vogel EA, Benowitz N. Nicotine delivery and cigarette equivalents from vaping a JUULpod. Tob Control [Internet]. 2022;31(e1):e88–93. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056367