The Kopi Lokal Islami Learning Model: Alternative Solution in Supporting 21st-Century Skills and Students Character

Vol 8 No 8 (2025): Volume 08 Issue 08 August 2025

Article Date Published : 29 August 2025 | Page No.: 4326-4341 | Google Scholar | Crossref doi for this article

Abstract :

This study aims to develop a learning model that enhances 21st-century skills and character development among university-level students. Skills such as critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration with character are crucial for facing the challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Society 5.0. Therefore, an appropriate learning model is needed for both schools and higher education institutions. The learning model developed in this research is the KoPI Lokal Islami, which integrates cooperative, project-based, and inquiry-based learning with local wisdom and Islamic values. This model was developed using the Dick and Carey Development Model. The outcomes of this study include the KoPI Lokal Islami Learning Model, teaching materials, 21st-century skills assessment tools, and character assessment instruments for prospective science teachers at the university level. Based on expert evaluations and small group testing, the KoPI Lokal Islami Learning Model is deemed highly suitable for implementation. Feedback from students (89 participants) also strongly supports the application of this model in fostering 21st-century skills and character development.

Keywords :

21st Century Skills., Character, KoPI Lokal Islami

References :

  1. Afandi, Sajidan, Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development frameworks of the Indonesian partnership 21 st -century skills standards for prospective science teachers: A Delphi study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647
  2. Amanova, A. K., Butabayeva, L. A., Abayeva, G. A., Umirbekova, A. N., Abildina, S. K., & Makhmetova, A. A. (2025). A systematic review of the implementation of STEAM education in schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), em2568–em2568. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15894
  3. Andri Nirwana, A. N., Rifai, A., Ali, M., Ali Mustofa, T., Nur Vambudi, V., Nur Rochim Maksum, M., & Umar Budihargo, M. (2025). SWOT Analysis of AI Integration in Islamic Education: Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Impacts. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(1), 476–503. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1498
  4. Andriana, E., Syachruroji, A., Alamsyah, T. P., & Sumirat, F. (2017). Natural science Big Book with Baduy local wisdom base media development for elementary school. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.8674
  5. Anggraini, N., Isfaeni, H., & Komala, R. (2024). Digital Student Worksheet on Ecology and Biodiversity to Enhance Critical Thinking and Digital Literacy for Middle School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(10), 7741–7747. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.8947
  6. Arizona, K. (2020). Elevating Students’ Competence Based Ict in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 5(2), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v5i2.7987
  7. Arizona, K., Gunawan, Harjono, A., Rokhmat, J., Ramdani, A., & Sukarso, A. (2023). Bale Tani and Alang in the Perspective of Science, Local Wisdom and Community Religiosity “Gumi Sasak” Lombok (Preliminary Study in the Development of Science Learning Devices Based on Local Wisdom and Islamic Values). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9636–9643. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4542
  8. Arizona, K., Rohkmat, J., Ramdani, A., Gunawan, & Sukarso, A. (2023). Development of Student Magnetic Inquiry Project Results Sheet ( SMIPRS ) Integrated with Local Wisdom and Islamic Values. 8(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v8i01.249
  9. Arizona, K., Rokhmat, J., & Ramdani, A. (2025). INTEGRATING ISLAMIC VALUES AND LOCAL WISDOM INTO SCIENCE EDUCATION: Enhancing Character Development in Higher Education. Ulumuna, 29(1), 398–428.
  10. Arizona, K., Rokhmat, J., Ramdani, A., Gunawan, G., & Sukarso, A. (2025). Examining Global Trends In 21st Century Skills : A Systematic Literature Review. May, 585–610. https://proceeding.uinmataram.ac.id/index.php/iconside/article/view/264
  1. Arizona, K., Rokhmat, J., Ramdani, A., Gunawan, & Sukarso, A. (2024). Learning Model KoPI Lokal Islami: Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives Kurniawan. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Islamic Education and Science Development (ICONSIDE), June, 334–341. https://proceeding.uinmataram.ac.id/index.php/iconside/article/view/146
  2. Arizona, K., Sucilestari, R., & Suhardi, R. M. (2025). The influence of web-based projects on students digital creativity in physics education : a gender-based analysis. Compton : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 12(1), 121–134.
  3. Asyari, A., Meiliyadi, L. A. D., Sucilestari, R., & Arizona, K. (2024). Exploring Student Creativity and Collaboration Through Project-Based Learning With Google Sites. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v10i2.40215
  4. Bulut, D., Samur, Y., & Cömert, Z. (2022). The effect of educational game design process on students’ creativity. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00188-9
  5. Celik, I., Gedrimiene, E., Siklander, S., & Muukkonen, H. (2024). The affordances of artificial intelligence-based tools for supporting 21st-century skills: A systematic review of empirical research in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 1–20.
  6. Chen, K., & Chen, C. (2021). Effects of STEM Inquiry Method on Learning Attitude and Creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(11), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11254
  7. Contreras-Espinosa, R. S., & Eguia-Gomez, J. L. (2022). Game Jams as Valuable Tools for the Development of 21st-Century Skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042246
  8. J.Treffinger, G.C. Young, E.C Selby, C. S. (2002). Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. In Journal of Education and Learning (Issue December). http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED505548%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3
  1. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2016). The Systematic Design of Instruction (Eighth Edi). Pearson.
  2. Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594
  3. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC).”.
  4. Facione, P. A. (2020). Advancing thingking worldwide. In Insight assessment: Vol. XXVIII (Issue 1). http://www.insightassessment.com/pdf_files/what&why2007.pd%0Ahttp://www.eduteka.org/PensamientoCriticoFacione.php
  5. Fitriani, N., Efendi, I., & Harisanti, B. M. (2019). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Ipa Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Desa Sembalun Untuk Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Mts. Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 7(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.33394/bjib.v7i1.2386
  6. Gu, X., Tong, D., Shi, P., Zou, Y., Yuan, H., Chen, C., & Zhao, G. (2023). Incorporating STEAM activities into creativity training in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101395
  1. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
  1. Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x
  2. Hartini, S., Firdausi, S., Misbah, & Sulaeman, N. F. (2018). The development of physics teaching materials based on local wisdom to train Saraba Kawa characters. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14249
  1. Haryani, E., Cobern, W. W., Pleasants, B. A. S., & Fetters, M. K. (2021). Analysis of teachers’ resources for integrating the skills of creativity and innovation, critical thinking and problem solving, collaboration, and communication in science classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.27084
  2. Hr, S., Nursyam, A., & Kafilawaty, B. N. (2024). Implementation of Digital Scientific Literacy in Family Education ( Gender Study in Remote Areas of South Sulawesi ). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 2176–2185. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.7005
  3. Iori, M., Barbareschi, M., Cavazza, A., Botti, A., Torresani, E., Trianni, A., Fiorino, C., & Doglioni, C. (2023). MO-10.1 – The Ai-Flopp Project, Federated Learning As A Step Forward In Digital Pathology: A Multi-Centric Pipeline And Qa Platform To Support Ai-Based Diagnosis Of Prostate Cancer. Physica Medica, 115, 102864. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102864
  4. Islam, P. P., Muspiroh, N., & Islam, N. (n.d.). IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon Jl . Perjuangan By Pass Sunyaragi Cirebon-Jawa Barat 4513213 Email : noviantimuspiroh.ak@gmail.com ABSTRAK This paper aims to examine the possibility of spiritual values that is integrated with subject-matter of general subjects. XXVIII(3), 484–498.
  5. Kurniawan, D. A., Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., & Muslimatul Husna, S. (2023). Study of Critical Thinking Skills, Science Process Skills and Digital Literacy: Reviewed Based on the Gender. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1741–1752. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.1644
  6. Lai, E. R. (1995). Critical Thinking: A Literature Review. In Pearson (Vol. 35, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35395184278.x
  7. Lang, V., & Šorgo, A. (2024). Views of Students, Parents, and Teachers on Smartphones and Tablets in the Development of 21st-Century Skills as a Prerequisite for a Sustainable Future. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073004
  1. Müller, S., & Pietzner, V. (2020). Comparative study of divergent thinking among participants in a German science competition and pupils in a control group. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8408
  2. Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Norén, E. (2020). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844
  1. Özgem, K., & Akçıl, U. (2022). An Investigation of Preschool Level Out-of-Class Education Activities in Finland, Estonia, Ireland, and Turkey within the Framework of 21st Century Skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148736
  2. Ramdani, A., Purwoko, A. A., Sukarso, A., & Sucilestari, R. (2024). Science Learning Innovation Using Augmented Reality Technology to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through Increasing Students’ Critical Thinking Abilities. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 10(4), 1675. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i4.12911
  3. Robert, J., & Price, E. (1986). Critical Thinking: Its Nature, Measurement and Improvement. National Institute of Education, Washington, DC., 37.
  4. Roshid, M. M., & Haider, M. Z. (2024). Teaching 21st-century skills in rural secondary schools: From theory to practice. Heliyon, 10(9), e30769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30769
  5. Roth, T., Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2022). Testing Creativity and Personality to Explore Creative Potentials in the Science Classroom. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1293–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10005-x
  6. Suastra, I. W., Jatmiko, B., Ristiati, N. P., & Yasmini, L. P. B. (2017). Developing characters based on local wisdom of bali in teaching physics in senior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.10681
  7. Sucilestari, R., & Arizona, K. (2018). Pengaruh Project Based Learning pada Matakuliah Elektronika Dasar terhadap Kecakapan Hidup Mahasiswa Prodi Tadris Fisika UIN Mataram. KOSNTAN Jurnal Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 26–35.
  8. Sucilestari, R., Arizona, K., Mutiara, B., Nirmala, A., & Aspia, A. (2025). Exploring the Effectiveness of Project-Based Blended Learning in Science E-Books for Improving Digital Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(6), 509–518. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i6.11131
  9. Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H. E., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017). Enhancement of students’ biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9622
  10. Torrance, E. P. (1977). Teaching for Creativity.pdf.
  11. Utaminingsih, E. S., Puspita, M. A., Ihsandi, A., Intania, B. Y., Prasetya, A. T., & Ellianawati, E. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: The Role of Character-Based Digital Literacy in 21st Century Learning in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4858
  12. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21 st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
  1. Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2
  2. Willingham, D. T. (2020). Ask the Cognitive Scientist: How Can Educators Teach Critical Thinking? American Educator, 44(3), 41–51. www.aft.org/ae/spring2020/debruyckere_kirschner_hulshof.
  3. Xing, Z., & Chen, Z. (2022). A Project-Based Approach for Learning Blockchain Technology. Procedia Computer Science, 214, 581–589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.215

Author's Affiliation

   Kurniawan Arizona
Doctor of Science Education, Postgraduate University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia & Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, UIN Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

   Joni Rokhmat
Doctor of Science Education, Postgraduate University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia & Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Mistress and Education, Mataram University, Mataram, Indonesia

   G. Gunawan
Doctor of Science Education, Postgraduate University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia & Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Mistress and Education, Mataram University, Mataram, Indonesia

   Ahmad Harjono
Doctor of Science Education, Postgraduate University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia & Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Mistress and Education, Mataram University, Mataram, Indonesia

   Agus Ramdani
Doctor of Science Education, Postgraduate University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia & Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Mistress and Education, Mataram University, Mataram, Indonesia

   AA Sukarso
Doctor of Science Education, Postgraduate University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia & Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Mistress and Education, Mataram University, Mataram, Indonesia

Copyrights & License

Kurniawan Arizona, Joni Rokhmat, G. Gunawan, Ahmad Harjono, Agus Ramdani, AA Sukarso, 2025

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Article Details

How to Cite :

The Kopi Lokal Islami Learning Model: Alternative Solution in Supporting 21st-Century Skills and Students Character. Kurniawan Arizona, Joni Rokhmat, G. Gunawan, Ahmad Harjono, Agus Ramdani, AA Sukarso, 8(8), 4326-4341. Retrieved from https://ijcsrr.org/single-view/?id=23867&pid=23653

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Kurniawan Arizona, Joni Rokhmat, G. Gunawan, Ahmad Harjono, Agus Ramdani, AA Sukarso,

View

134

Citation

Downloads

Article Details