Abstract :
This study investigates how artificial intelligence (AI) influences the English‑learning processes of third‑year Business English majors at Nguyen Tat Thanh University (NTTU). A mixed‑methods design was employed, comprising an online survey (n = 34) and semi‑structured interviews (n = 15). Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS 26, yielding Cronbach’s α = .984, and qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. Students reported that AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Grammarly) enhanced personalized learning (44.1 %), provided instant feedback (17.6 %), and increased motivation (17.6 %). Interview themes highlighted efficiency gains, richer access to specialized Business English materials, and greater communicative confidence. These findings demonstrate AI’s pedagogical value in Business English instruction and suggest that integrating AI‑powered platforms can optimize curriculum design. Future research should compare AI‑mediated and traditional teaching to assess long‑term learning outcomes.
Keywords :
AI‑powered language learning, Artificial Intelligence, Business English; Mixed‑methods study, Student perceptions.References :
- Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta‑analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314.
- Akar, B. (2002). The role of English in multinational corporations: A case study in Turkey. Journal of Business Communication, 39(3), 287–308.
- Alhalangy, A. G. I., & AbdAlgane, M. (2023). Exploring the impact of AI on the EFL context: A case study of Saudi universities. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(2), 41–49.
- AlShaikh, R., Al‑Malki, N., & Almasre, M. (2024). The implementation of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning in the design and evaluation of an AI educational video assistant utilizing large language models. Heliyon, 10(3).
- Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e‑rater® V.2. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(3).
- Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). Springer.
- Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., & Yuhnke, B. (2018). NMC Horizon Report: 2018 Higher Education Edition. EDUCAUSE.
- British Council. (2021). The English effect. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org
- Chu, H.‑C., Hwang, G. H., Tu, Y. F., & Yang, K. H. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most‑cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 22–42.
- Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22.
- Costa, P., Tavares, T., & de Castro, R. (2021). Speech recognition in language learning: A systematic review. Language Learning & Technology, 25(2), 82–99.
- Du, J. (2024). AI chatbots and oral fluency development: Learner perceptions and outcomes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 56, 101012.
- Duolingo Inc. (2023). Duolingo impact report. Retrieved from https://www.duolingo.com
- Forman, G. (2003). An extensive empirical study of feature‑selection metrics for text classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 1289–1305.
- Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
- Hart‑Rawung, P. (2008). The role of English proficiency in global job markets. International Journal of Business Communication, 45(4), 521–539.
- Hart‑Rawung, P., & Li, L. (2008). Globalization and business communication: English communication skills for Thai automotive engineers. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 48, 320–330.
- Jinming, D. U., & Daniel, B. K. (2024). A systematic review of AI‑powered chatbots in EFL speaking practice: Transforming language education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100230.
- Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2019). NMC Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition. EDUCAUSE.
- Kerly, A., Ellis, R., & Bull, S. (2007). Conversational agents in e‑learning. User Modeling and User‑Adaptive Interaction, 19(2), 99–120.
- Keslar, A. (2018). Personalized learning through AI: Trends and prospects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 221–239.
- Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218.
- Khan, M. S., & Umer, H. (2024). ChatGPT in finance: Applications, challenges, and solutions. Heliyon, 10(2).
- Khanzode, K. C. A., & Sarode, R. D. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence and machine learning: A literature review. International Journal of Library & Information Science, 9(1), 3.
- Langley, C., Cuzzolin, F., & Sahakian, B. J. (2024). Neuroscience for AI: The importance of theory of mind.
- Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 100174.
- Lee, S. J., & Kwon, K. (2024). A systematic review of AI education in K‑12 classrooms from 2018 to 2023: Topics, strategies, and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100211.
- Liang, J.‑C., & Yang, S.‑J. H. (2020). AI‑based personalized learning systems: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(2), 276–286.
- Loewen, S., Isbell, D. R., & Spiers, A. (2020). Impacts of adaptive feedback in language learning apps. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 104–123.
- Madanat, H., Ab Rashid, R., Hashmi, U. M., Alqaryouti, M. H., Mohamed, M., & Al Smadi, O. A. (2024). Jordanian English language educators’ perceived readiness for virtual learning environments. Heliyon, 10(4).
- Ojanperä, O. (2014). Effects of using English in business communication in Japanese‑based multinational corporations (Master’s thesis).
- Ou, A. W., Stöhr, C., & Malmström, H. (2024). Academic communication with AI‑powered language tools in higher education: From a post‑humanist perspective. System, 121, 103225.
- Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023). On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 269–275.
- Rodríguez, J. V., Rodríguez‑Rodríguez, I., & Woo, W. L. (2022). On the application of machine learning in astronomy and astrophysics: A text‑mining‑based scientometric analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 12(5), e1476.
- Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
- Shermis, M. D., & Hammer, A. L. (2013). Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation. Routledge.
- Silver, D., et al. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484–489.
- Tavel, P. (2007). Modeling and simulation design. AK Peters Ltd.
- Vandermeeren, S. (2014). English as a lingua franca in written corporate communication: Findings from a European survey. In Writing Business (pp. 273–291). Routledge.
- Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
- Xie, H., Chu, H.‑C., Hwang, G.‑J., & Wang, C.‑C. (2019). Trends and development in technology‑enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers & Education, 140, 103599.

