Abstract :
The objective of this study was to evaluate how the implementation of a proper decision-making policy will improve human relations on a high level of administrative efficiency in line with existing policies, strategies, and standards which ensure a sustainable process to achieve an efficient and effective role in both performance management and goal achievement in the system. This inquiry used the descriptive method. The designed research instrument consists of twenty (20) highly structured questions in decision-making, which identifies four variables differentiating among types of decision, determining the amount and type of information needed, establishing priorities for action, and anticipating consequences, and twenty (20) predetermined statements on improving human relations that will determines another four variables such are: develop rapport, build trust and confidence, openness and transparency. Purposive sampling was utilized for the school heads. Selected respondents were the thirty-eight (38) school heads from junior high schools and two hundred seventy-eight (278) teachers from Division of Lanao del Norte teaching junior high schools. The study revealed a correlation between decision-making to improve human interactions and a high level of administrative efficiency. This suggests that the two variables reported by school managers and teachers are modestly connected. This demonstrates that the two groups’ reactions to decisions aimed at improving human connections have been modestly connected.
Keywords :
Administrative Efficiency, Collaboration, Decision making, enhance human relations.References :
- Bryk, A.S. (2020). Improvement in Action: Advancing Quality in America’s Schools. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
- Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (20). Tru20st in schools: A core resource for school reform. Educational leadership, 60(6), 40–45. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/trust-inschools-a-core-resource-for-school-reform
- Elmore R., (2008). Leadership as the practice of improvement. Improving School Leadership, Volume 2: Case Studies on System Leadership – ISBN: 978-92-64-03308-5
- Fullan, M. (2019). Nuance: Why some leaders succeed and others fail. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
- Goddard, Goddard, & Tschannen-Moran, (2007). Instructional Leadership: A Pathway to Teacher Collaboration and Student Achievement
- Hargreaves, A (2020). ‘Large-scale assessments and their effects: The case of mid-stakes tests in Ontario’, Journal of Education Change, 21, p 393–420.
- Harris, A. (2021). System leaders and system leadership: exploring the contemporary evidence base. School Leadership Management
- Leithwood, K., (2020). A Review of Evidence about Equitable School Leadership. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 377
- Maalouf, G. (2019). Effects of collaborative leadership on organizational performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development. 6(1):138-144. DOI: 10.22271/ijmrd. 2019.v6. i1.25
- Mendez, N., (2023). Do Collaborative Management Actions Lead to Better Organizational Outcomes? https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2256994
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA
