Abstract :

Employee productivity is a key indicator in assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of individual performance in achieving organizational goals. Achieving optimal productivity is influenced by various factors, including individual psychological aspects and interpersonal relationships within the workplace, thereby requiring support from company management. This study aims to analyze the influence of psychological capital and leader-member exchange on employee productivity at Company, located in East Jakarta. This company is a multinational manufacturing company in the consumer health sector that produces various healthcare products for both domestic and international markets. The sampling in this study was conducted using a stratified random sampling technique, involving 131 respondents, consisting of both permanent and non-permanent employees directly recruited directly by the company. The research instrument utilized a questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale, and data were collected through an online survey method. Data analysis was performed using the Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) approach with the SmartPLS software. The results of the analysis indicate that all proposed hypotheses are supported, suggesting significant relationships among the variables. Psychological capital was found to have a positive influence on employee productivity, as did leader-member exchange. These findings offer practical implications for company management, highlighting the importance of fostering employees’ positive psychological conditions and maintaining high-quality superior-subordinate relationships to sustainably enhance productivity.

---

Keywords :

Employee Productivity, Leader member exchange, Psychological capital.

---

References :

1. Amini, A. dan Mortazavi, S. (2012). Effectiveness of psychological capital on mistake management culture as a resource for learning in organization. Turkey: International Journal of Human Sciences.
2. Ardila, L. dan Dewanto, D. (2022). The Influence Of Leader Member Exchange and Organizational Culture On Work Productivity. Jakarta: Energy Business and Management Journal.
3. Çavuş, M. F. dan Kapusuz, A. G. (2015). Psychological Capital: Definition, Components and Effects. Turkey: British Journal of Education Society & Behavioural Science.
4. Cato, S. T., & Gordon, J. (2009). Relationship of the strategic vision alignment to employee productivity and student enrolment. Germany: Research in Higher Education Journal.
5. Erdogan, B. dan Bauer, T. N. (2015). Leader–Member Exchange Theory. United States: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.
6. Goshu, Y. Y. et al. (2017). Development of Productivity Measurement and Analysis Framework for Manufacturing Companies. Iran: Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering.
7. Graen, G. B. dan Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective. North Carolina: The Leadership Quarterly.
8. Graen dan Novak (1982). The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange and Job Design on Productivity and Satisfaction: Testing a Dual Attachment Model. Cambridge: Academic Press, Inc.
9. Hair, J. F. et al. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Hanaysha, J. R. (2016). Improving employee productivity through work engagement: Evidence from higher education sector. Canada: Management Science Letters.
11. Jackson, D. A. (2018). The Relationship Between Psychological Capital and Readiness for Organizational Change among Behavioral Health Professionals. Michigan: ProQuest LLC.
12. Lapointe et. al. (2019). Social Comparisons, Self-Conceptions, and Attributions: Assessing the Self-Related Contingencies in Leader-Member Exchange Relationships. United State: Journal of Business and Psychology.
13. Liden et al. (2015). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. United Kingdom: Journal of Organizational Behavior.
14. Luthans et al. (2007). Positive Psychological Capital: Measurement and Relationship with Performance and Satisfaction. Nebraska: Personnel Psychology 60.
15. Locker, K. O. dan Kaczmarek, S. K. (2014). Business Communication: Building Critical Skills (6th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
16. Lorenz et al. (2016). Measuring Psychological Capital: Construction and Validation of the Compound PsyCap Scale (CPC-12). Berlin: Plos One.
17. (2014). Manajemen Organisasi. Bandung: Citapustaka Media Perintis.
18. Paramanantham, S. (2023). Assessing the Impact of Human Error Assessment on Organization Performance in the Software Industry. Sri Lanka: International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change.
19. Pryce-Jones, J. (2010). Happiness at Work: Maximizing Your Psychological Capital For Success. New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell.
20. Rahadi, D. R. (2023). Pengantar Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Tasikmalaya: CV. Lentera Ilmu Madani.

21. Robbins, S. P. dan Coulter, M. (2013). Management (11th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
22. Sakka et al. (2024). The Impact of Psychological Capital and Mediation Role of Intrinsic Motivation on Employee Productivity on Manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia. Pakistan: International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.
23. Sharma, M. S., & Sharma, M. V. (2014). Employee Engagement to Enhance Productivity in Current Scenario. Portsmouth: International Journal of Commerce, Business and Management.
24. Youssef-Morgan, C. M. dan Luthans, F. (2005). Resiliency development of organizations, leaders and employees: Multilevel theory building for sustained performance. Netherlands: Elsevier.
25. Yukl, G. (2015). Leadership in Organizations (7th Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.