Abstract :

Comparison of Children Learning in Science model with Direct Instruction in the development of critical thinking skills in learning science in elementary school. The purpose of this study was to determine the comparison of children Learning in Science with Direct Instruction in the development of critical thinking skills in terms of learning motivation in learning science in elementary school district Kedawung-Sragen, this study is a quasi-experimental research, using quantitative data analysis and sampling using cluster random sampling. Data collection is by test. The research Data were analyzed by stages: prerequisite analysis test, variance analysis test of two unequal cell paths, and further analysis of variance test. The results of the test calculation of variance analysis of two unequal cell paths obtained data that Fcount (75.61) > Ftable (3.89), and in further tests Anava, obtained data that the marginal mean of Children Learning in Science model is 89.78 greater than the Direct Instruction model which has an average of 77.66. The conclusion of the study is that the model of children Learning in Science is more effective than the model of Direct Instruction in the development of critical thinking skills.

---

Keywords :

CLIS learning, Critical Thinking Skills, Direct Instruction

---

References :

1. Abdul Majid. (2015). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
2. Al Fanny, D., & Roesdiana, L. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Garis dan Sudut Pada Peserta didik SMP. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 2(1c).
3. Ariadila, S., Silalahi, Y. F., Fadiyah, F., Jamaludin, U., & Setiawan, S. (2023). Analisis Pentingnya Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Pembelajaran Bagi Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(20), 664-669. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8436970
4. Budiarto, F. (2015). Keefektifan Modelpembelajaran CLIS (Children Learning In Science) Terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar IPA. Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i1.737
5. (2016). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Solo: UNS Press.
6. Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37-48. Doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3
7. Erlistiani, M., Syachruroji, A., & Andriana, E. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran SSCS (Search, Solve, Create and Share) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 13(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.13.2.161-168.
8. Irvy, I. I. (2020). Understanding the Learning Models Design for Indonesian Teacher. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i2.40
9. Kardi, & Nur. (2000). Pengajaran Langsung. Surabaya: Universitas Press.
10. Larasati1, F., dan Syamsuriza. (2022). Validitas Instrumen Tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta DidikKelas XII SMA/MA tentang Materi Mutasi. Journal On Teacher Education, 4(1), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.31004/jote.v4i1.6073
11. Manurung, A. S., Fahrurrozi, F., Utomo, E., & Gumelar, G. (2023). Implementasi Berpikir Kritis dalam Upaya Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 120–132. Retrieved from https://e-journal.unimudasorong.ac.id/index.php/jurnalpendidikandasar/article/view/1831
12. Muhibbin Syah. 2003. Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
13. Rahmawati, Y., Madlazim, M., & Sudibyo, E. (2024). The Role of Brain-Based Learning in Training Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(2), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i2.578
14. Samatowa, U. (2006). Bagaimana Membelajarkan IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Depdiknas: Dirjen PT. Direktorat Ketenagaan
15. Sari, R. R., Indrawati, Gani, A. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Clis (Children Learning in Science) Dengan Orientasi Melalui Observasi Gejala Fisis Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa-Fisika Di Smp. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(4), 324 – 329. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/1427-1-2748-1-10-20150416.pdf
16. Sudiarta, I. W., Diputra, G. N. O., Nayun, I. W., & Sutanaya, I. B. A. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Matematika Secara Daring Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Peserta didik. Suluh Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pendidikan, 19(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.46444/suluh-pendidikan.v19i1.243
17. Suhelayanti, et al. (2023). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam dan Sosial (IPAS). Langsa: Yayasan Kita Menulis
18. Supartini, K. W. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Direct Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Food and Beverage pada Kompetensi Menerapkan Teknik Platting dan Garnish. Journal of Education Action Research, 5(2), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v5i2.33340
19. (2022). The effect of direct learning model with routine practice on self-efficacy and student learning outcomes. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 10(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.29210/172200
20. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
21. Winkel, W. S. 2004. Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
22. Yanti, W. (2019). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas X IPA 1 SMA Negeri 15 Kota Takengon Tahun Pelajaran 2018-2019. BIOTIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Teknologi dan Kependidikan, 7(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.22373/biotik.v7i2.5652
23. Yulianto, A., Yulianto, S., & Hidayanto, E. (2022). Pembelajaran Matematika Berbantuan Video Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i3.731