Abstract :

This study investigates the effectiveness of Baamboozle, a digital game-based learning tool, in teaching English vocabulary to Pre-Starter level students at Phuong Nam Language Center, Ho Chi Minh City. Quantitative and qualitative methods are employed. Quantitative data was obtained from questionnaires and tests while qualitative data was collected from interviews. 88 Pre-Starter level students and 17 teachers at Phuong Nam Language Center, Ho Chi Minh City participated in the research. The findings reveal that Baamboozle significantly improves students’ vocabulary acquisition and students’ engagement compared to traditional methods. Both teachers and students expressed a positive attitude toward the Bamboozle tool, appreciating its interactive and enjoyable nature. However, the study also highlights some challenges when using the tool such as inconsistent use across classes and content repetitiveness. The study recommends regular integration of Baamboozle into English lessons supported by teacher training, and suggests further research on its long-term effects in language learning. This study adds valuable insights into the use of educational technology to enhance language instruction.

---

Keywords :

Attitude, Baamboozle, game-based learning tool, Pre-Starter level, Vocabulary acquisition.

---

References :

1. Adamson, J. (2004). Investigating college student attitudes towards learning English and their learning strategies: Insights from interviews in Thailand. Journal of Asia TEFL(2).
2. AERA, T., & AERA. (2011). Code of Ethics-American Educational Research Association. Educational Researcher(3), 145-156.
3. Arini, A. R., & Suwarso, P. N. (2024). EFL STUDENTS’PERCEPTION TOWARDS THE USE OF BAAMBOOZLE FOR VOCABULARY LEARNING. Eltin Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 12(1), 97-110.
4. Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. B. (2011). The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in University Putra Malaysia. English language teaching(2), 84.
5. Association, A. P. (2016). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.
6. Association, W. M. (1964). Declaration of helsinki. http://www. med. or. jp/wma/helsinki02_j. html.
7. Babbie, E. (2010). Research design. The practice of social research, 90-123.
8. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction: Guilford Press.
9. Berna Karakoç, K. E., Esen Turan Ozpolat, Ibrahim Yildirim. (2022). The effect of game-based learning on student achievement: A meta-analysis study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(1), 207-222.
10. Biomedical, U. S. N. C. f. t. P. o. H. S. o., & Research, B. (1978). The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Commission for the ….
11. Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative health research(13), 1802-1811.
12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology(2), 77-101.
13. Brewster, J., Ellis, G., & Girard, D. (2002). The primary English teacher’s guide (New Edition). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 37-49.
14. Brown, C., Moore, J., Silkstone, B., & Botton, C. (1996). The construct validity and context dependency of teacher assessment of practical skills in some pre‐university level science examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 3(3), 377-392.
15. Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge UP.
16. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment: Sage publications.
17. Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. Intercultural language use and language learning, 41-57.
18. Cervatiuc, A. (2008). ESL vocabulary acquisition: Target and approach. The Internet TESL Journal, 14(1).
19. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage publications.
20. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological bulletin, 52(4), 281.
21. Division, C. o. E. C. f. C. C.-o. E. C. M. L. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment: Cambridge University Press.
22. Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing: Routledge.
23. Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & education, 51(1), 187-199.
24. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: Cambridge university press.
25. Ellis, G. (2002). Tell it again!: The new storytelling handbook for primary teachers: Penguin Books.
26. Ellis, N. C. (2008). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The modern language journal, 92(2), 232-249.
27. Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. The United States: Oxford, 98.
28. Ellis, R. (2003). Designing a task-based syllabus. RELC journal, 34(1), 64-81.
29. English, C. A. (2018). Cambridge English Qualifications. Pre A1 Starters, A1 Movers and A2 Flyers. Handbook for teachers: Cambridge Assessment English. https://www. academia. edu/42735843 ….
30. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. (No Title).
31. Goudvis, A., & Harvey, S. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. York, ME: Stenhouse.
32. Graves, M. F. (2006). Building a comprehensive vocabulary program. New England Reading Association Journal, 42(2), 1.
33. Hammersley, M., & Traianou, A. (2012). Ethics and educational research: British Educational Research Association London.
34. Han, S. (2023). The contribution of blog-based writing instruction to enhancing writing performance and writing motivation of Chinese EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1069585.
35. Harris, J. (2005). Our agenda for technology integration: It’s time to choose. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 116-122.
36. Harris, S. (2002). Innovative pedagogical practices using ICT in schools in England. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 449-458.
37. Hatch, E. M., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics: New York, NY: Newbury House Publishers.
38. Hirsh, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure?
39. Hoover, L. (2021). What is qualitative vs. quantitative study. edu Available: https://www. gcu. edu/blog/doctoral-journey/what-qualitative-vs-quantitative-study [Accessed Feb. 12th, 2023].
40. Iskandar, S., Rosmana, P. S., Agnia, A., Farhatunnisa, G., Fireli, P., & Safitri, R. (2022). Pengunaan Aplikasi Baamboozle Untuk Meningkatkan Antusias Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(6), 12500-12505.
41. Johnson, A., & Heffernan, N. (2006). The short readings project: A CALL reading activity utilizing vocabulary recycling. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 63-77.
42. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(2), 112-133.
43. Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Hsiu-Ping, Y. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TECH TRENDS-WASHINGTON DC-, 43, 24-32.
44. Kim Hye -young, K. Y.-h. (2012). Exploring smartphone applications for effective mobile-assisted language learning. Multimedia language education, 15(1), 31-57.
45. Konting, M. M., Kamaruddin, N., & Man, N. A. (2009). Quality Assurance in Higher Education Institutions: Exit Survey among Universiti Putra Malaysia Graduating Students. International Education Studies, 2(1), 25-31.
46. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Acquiring a second language. World Englishes, 1(3), 97-101.
47. Krisbiantoro, B. (2020). The effectiveness of gamification to enhance students’ mastery on tenses viewed from students’ creativity. Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2), 73.
48. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: an introduction to qualitive research interviewing: Sage.
49. Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied linguistics, 22(1), 1-26.
50. Lewin, C., Smith, A., Morris, S., & Craig, E. (2019). Using Digital Technology to Improve Learning: Evidence Review. Education Endowment Foundation.
51. Little, D. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language teaching, 39(3), 167-190.
52. Liu, K.-P., Tai, S.-J. D., & Liu, C.-C. (2018). Enhancing language learning through creation: The effect of digital storytelling on student learning motivation and performance in a school English course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 913-935.
53. Lombard, M., Snyder‐Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human communication research, 28(4), 587-604.
54. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of second language acquisition.
55. Mao, J. (2014). Social media for learning: A mixed methods study on high school students’ technology affordances and perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 213-223.
56. Marrahí-Gómez, V., & Belda-Medina, J. (2022). The application of augmented reality (AR) to language learning and its impact on student motivation. International Journal of Linguistics Studies, 2(2), 07-14.
57. Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction.
58. McKay, P. (2009). Assessing young language learners: Oxford University Press.
59. Mokhtar, A. A., Rawian, R. M., Yahaya, M. F., Abdullah, A., & Mohamed, A. R. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of adult ESL learners. The English Teacher, 38(1).
60. Nabila, H. (2023). THE USE OF BAAMBOOZLE GAMES TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’VOCABULARY OF STATE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 2 PANTI IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2023/2024. STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY.
61. Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American educational research journal, 24(2), 237-270.
62. Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. Handbook of reading research, 3(269-284).
63. Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (Vol. 10): Cambridge university press Cambridge.
64. Nation, I. S. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques.
65. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory 2nd edition (New York: McGraw).
66. Nhu, P. T. T., & Quyen, T. N. Q. (2021). Improving Vocabulary Learning With Memrise Mobile Application For Students In Vietnam. International Journal on E-Learning Practices (IJELP), 4, 61-75.
67. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, B., & Turner, L. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(2), 112-133.
68. Oxford, R., & Crookall, D. (1990). Vocabulary learning: A critical analysis of techniques. TESL Canada journal, 09-30.
69. Pardede, P. (2018). Mixed Methods Research Designs in EFL, Leed collegiate forum, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
70. Pinter, A. (2017). Teaching young language learners: Oxford University Press.
71. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497.
72. Protection, F. D. (2018). General data protection regulation (GDPR). Intersoft Consulting, Accessed in October, 24(1).
73. Qureshi, H., & Khatoon, S. (2023). The Impact of Gamification Tools on Reading Comprehension Skills: A Comparative Study of Kahoot! Quzizz and Baamboozle of English Language Learners. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(4), 181-195.
74. Read, J. (2004). 7. research in teaching vocabulary. Annual review of applied linguistics, 24, 146-161.
75. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching: Cambridge university press.
76. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2014). Language and communication: Routledge.
77. Rohmah, H. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of baamboozle in teaching english vocabularies at secondary level from students’perspective. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language and Language Teaching.
78. Sáez, A. R., & Espinoza, A. Q. (2023). Baamboozle’s Influence On Willingness To Communicate In English In Small Group Private Lessons. Journal of Namibian Studies, 34, 6646-6661.
79. Saud, S., Aeni, N., & Azizah, L. (2022). Leveraging bamboozles and quizziz to engage EFL students in online classes. International Journal of Language Education(2), 169-182.
80. Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy, 199227, 4-6.
81. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary acquisition. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge Language Education, 116-141.
82. Sugiyono, S. (2007). Statistika untuk penelitian: Alfabeta.
83. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53.
84. Thornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking: Longman.
85. Tran, P. (2016). Training learners to use Quizlet vocabulary activities on mobile phones in Vietnam with Facebook. JALT CALL Journal, 12(1), 43-56.
86. Tran, T. Q., & Nguyen, V. L. T. (2023). Insights into Vietnamese bilingual students’ quizlet-based english vocabulary learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(3), 682-688.
87. Ur, P., & Thornbury, S. (2012). Vocabulary activities.
88. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes: Harvard university press.
89. Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language teaching, 31(2), 57-71.
90. Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional Syllabuses. Oxford University Press.
91. Yanguas, I. (2009). Multimedia glosses and their effect on L2 text comprehension and vocabulary learning.