Abstract :

The Fruit Tree-Based Intercropped Milpa System (MIAF) is characterized by its systemic approach, which considers the interactions among the biological, physical, and socioeconomic components of the agroecosystem. The objective of this research was to analyze the MIAF system as a complex productive model, integrating into Rolando García’s theoretical framework of complex systems the agroecological principles underlying its design, as well as its conceptualization from complexity sciences and contemporary soil science theories. An information search was conducted, consisting of a state-of-the-art analysis and bibliometric maps of Complex Agrarian Systems (CAS) and the MIAF concept using the Scopus platform and VOSviewer. A total of 591 documents were found for the concept of Complex Agrarian System, and 53 for MIAF. For the first concept, it was found that it has been used from 1974 to 2024, primarily in 10 countries, with 65.5% being scientific articles and spanning 11 thematic areas. Meanwhile, the second concept has been used from 1985 to 2025 in 10 countries, with 90.6% being scientific articles and covering 11 thematic areas. Eighteen philosophers and 66 theories dating back to 1900, inherent to the Galilean tradition and focused on the MIAF system, were identified. Additionally, five concepts that have surpassed agroecology in contemporary discourse were identified and described. It is concluded that MIAF stands as a successful agroecological model by integrating traditional knowledge and technical innovation, enhancing biodiversity, food security, and climate resilience. Its study, framed within Rolando García’s and Bertalanffy’s complex systems theories, reveals that its sustainability depends on biological, physical, and socioeconomic interactions. Bibliometric analyses highlight a gap between the concepts of “Complex Agrarian System” and “MIAF,” pointing to opportunities for future research linking them. Therefore, INIFAP continues to advance its research while adopting the CAS framework to strengthen MIAF implementation, as this system not only represents an agroecological solution but also a practical example of the adaptability of systemic theories in sustainable agriculture.

---

Keywords :

disciplines, maize, MIAF, terraces, Theories

---

References :

1. Altieri, M. A., & Nicholls, C. I. (2012). Agroecology: Scientific foundations for sustainable agriculture.Revista Agroecología, 7(1), 7-18.
2. Altieri, M. A. (2009). Agroecology: Science and practice for sustainable agriculture.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/agroecology/home/en/
3. Altieri, M. A. (2008). Agroecology: Scientific foundations for sustainable agriculture(3rd ed.). Editorial Nordan-Comunidad.
4. Altieri, M. A. (1983). Agroecology: The scientific basis of alternative agriculture.CRC Press.
5. Astier, M., Speelman, E. N., López-Ridaura, S., Masera, O. R., & González-Esquivel, C. E. (2017). Sustainability indicators for peasant agroecosystems: A methodological approach based on resilience and participatory frameworks.Ecological Indicators, 73, 602–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.022
6. Barrera-Bassols, N., & Toledo, V. M. (2005). “Ethnoecology of the Yucatec Maya”.Journal of Ethnobiology.
7. Bertalanffy, L. v. (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications.New York: George Braziller.
8. García, R. (2006). Complex systems: Concepts, method, and epistemological foundation of interdisciplinary research. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
9. Gómez López, E. (2017). The scientific revolution and the Galilean current: An epistemological analysis.Estudios Históricos, 61(2), 293-318. https://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=898&numero=64317
10. Gliessman, S. R. (2007). Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems(2nd ed.). CRC Press.
11. Gliessman, S. R. (1983). Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems.CRC Press.
12. Howard, A. (1940). An agricultural testament.Oxford University Press.
13. Ibraheem, M. N., & Parker, D. R. (2015). Soil water relationships and crop production in dryland agriculture.Advances in Agronomy, 134, 1-82. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016706119301569
14. Jones, A. D., Holmes, T. P., & Gareth, D. (2008). Ecosystem restoration in a changing world: New directions for research and practice.Restoration Ecology, 16(1), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00383.x
15. Lal, R. (2015). Soil carbon sequestration in India.In Soil and Climate Change (pp. 281-300).
16. Levin, S. A. (1998). Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems.Ecosystems, 1(5), 431-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900037
17. Liniger, H. P., Mekdaschi Studer, R., Hauert, C., & Gurtner, M. (2015). Sustainable land management in practice: Guidelines and best practices for sub-Saharan Africa.TerrAfrica, World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT), and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://www.fao.org/3/i5411e/i5411e.pdf
18. Méndez, V. E., Bacon, C. M., & Cohen, R. (2013). Agroecology as a transdisciplinary, participatory, and action-oriented approach.Agriculture and Human Values, 30(3), 611-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9436-8
19. Moura, D., Carvalho, I. C., de Oliveira, F. W., & Marques, B. M. (2018). Economic viability of agroforestry systems with fruit trees in the Brazilian semiarid region.Agroforestry Systems, 92(1), 127-138. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772100212X

20. Najera, A., Vandermeer, J., & Hanson, P. (2018). The role of multistrata agroforestry in improving ecosystem services and agroecological resilience in Central America.International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16(5), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1509006
21. Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J., & Wright, A. (2010). Nature’s matrix: Linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty.
22. Sevilla-Guzmán, E., & Woodgate, G. (2013). Agroecology: Foundations in agrarian social thought and sociological theory.Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(4), 563-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12013
23. Soto, G., & Beer, J. (1995). Management of soil microbiology in agroforestry systems: The case of Central America.In J. Beer, J. L. Bonnemann, W. Chavez, H. J. Fassbender, & A. C. Imbach (Eds.), Advances in agroforestry research: Proceedings of a seminar (pp. 45-62). CATIE.
24. Soto-Pinto, L., Anzueto, M., Mendoza, J., Jiménez-Ferrer, G., & de Jong, B. (2017). Agroforestry and agroecological transitions: Key drivers for rural livelihoods and ecosystem services in peasant coffee systems.Agroforestry Systems, 91(1), 175.
25. Tischler, W. (1965). Agroecology: The ecology of agricultural systems.
26. Torres-Salcido, G., Rodríguez-Robayo, K. J., & Juárez-Sánchez, P. (2021). The Milpa Intercropped with Fruit Trees (MIAF) as a successional agroforestry system: An analysis of its ecological and socioeconomic benefits.Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 12(3), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i3.2718
27. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer (Version 1.6.20) [Computer software].Leiden University. https://www.vosviewer.com
28. Van der Zaag, P., Fox, P., & Cornish, P. S. (2016). Microclimate modification in agroforestry systems: Effects on soil temperature and moisture.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 221, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.02.001

29. Werner, J., & Taube, F. (2001). Agroecology: Concepts and applications for agriculture and rural development.
30. Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement, and a practice: A review.Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009004