Abstract :

Background: University students are more likely to experience digital burnout as they utilize and are exposed to digital gadgets regularly in both academic and personal contexts.

Purpose: To assess the prevalence of digital burnout among medical science students and correlate the digital burnout levels with various demographic variables.

Methods: Through convenient sampling, a descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 300 students (86.3%, males 13.7 %) from all programs and levels. The tools used to collect data were Tool 1 – Demographic Data and Tool 2 – Digital Burnout Scale (DBS).

Results: The results showed that 75% of the students reported moderate to slight burnout. Overall, and across all subcategories, mean scores indicate moderate degrees of burnout. A significant difference in digital burnout was observed across age groups (F=4.62, p=0.011), with individuals aged 24 and older reporting the highest levels of burnout compared to their younger counterparts. A statistically significant difference was found in the digital burnout scores among groups based on time spent online, i.e., more than 6 hours (F=4.52, p=0.007).  Overall, the study indicates that the students experience moderate burnout, which is related to age and time spent on the devices.

Conclusion: Targeted approaches are required to address digital burnout, especially in seniors and those who spend an immense amount of time online. Institutions should study in deep implementing interventions to promote healthier digital habits and provide resources to support students’ well-being in increasingly digital academic environments.

---

Keywords :

Burnout, Digital, Digital devices, Mental Health, Technology

---

References :

1. Nah K, Oh S, Han B, Kim H, Lee A. A study on the user experience to improve immersion as a digital human in lifestyle content. Appl Sci. 2022;12(23):12467. doi:10.3390/app122312467.
2. Greenberg LK. Digital lives: The clinical implications of technology on young adults [dissertation]. Moraga, CA: Saint Mary’s College of California; 2016.
3. Sharma MK, Anand N, Ahuja S, Thakur PC, Mondal I, Singh P, et al. Digital burnout: COVID-19 lockdown mediates excessive technology use stress. World Soc Psychiatry. 2020;2(2):171-172. doi:10.4103/WSP.WSP_21_20.
4. Doruk M, Mustafaoğlu R, Gul H. The impact of using technological devices on mental and physical health in adolescents. Eur J Ther. 2023;29(2).
5. Song W, Wang Z, Zhang R. Classroom digital teaching and college students’ academic burnout in the post-COVID-19 era: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13403.
6. Güneş Ç, Uysal HH. The relationship between teacher burnout and organizational socialization among English language teachers. J Lang Linguist Stud. 2019;15(1):339-361.
7. Shirom A, Melamed S, Toker S, Berliner S, Shapira I. Burnout and health review: Current knowledge and future research directions. Int Rev Ind Organ Psychol. 2005;20(1):269-308.
8. Erten P, Özdemir O. The digital burnout scale. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2020;21(2):668-683.
9. Durmuş SÇ, Gülnar E, Özveren H. Determining digital burnout in nursing students: A descriptive research study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;111:105300.
10. Choi SY, Kim JH. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Digital Burnout Scale. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1386394.
11. Erten P, Özdemir O. The digital burnout scale. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2020;21(2):668-683.
12. Ali MD, Al Hatef EAJ. Types of sampling and sample size determination in health and social science research. J Young Pharm. 2024;16(2):204-215.
13. Kong LN, Yao Y, Chen SZ, Zhu JL. Prevalence and associated factors of burnout among nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;121:105706.
14. Durmuş SÇ, Gülnar E, Özveren H. Determining digital burnout in nursing students: A descriptive research study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;111:105300.
15. Sharma MK, Anand N, Ahuja S, Thakur PC, Mondal I, Singh P, et al. Digital burnout: COVID-19 lockdown mediates excessive technology use stress. World Soc Psychiatry. 2020;2(2):171-172.
16. Song W, Wang Z, Zhang R. Classroom digital teaching and college students’ academic burnout in the post-COVID-19 era: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13403.
17. Jafari F, Janatolmakan M, Khubdast S, Azizi SM, Khatony A. The relationship of internet abusive use with academic burnout and academic performance in nursing students. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:2765763.
18. Pospos S, Young IT, Downs N, Iglewicz A, Depp C, Chen JY, et al. Web-based tools and mobile applications to mitigate burnout, depression, and suicidality among healthcare students and professionals: A systematic review. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42:109-120.
19. Kumpikaitė-Valiūnienė V, Aslan I, Duobienė J, Glińska E, Anandkumar V. Influence of digital competence on perceived stress, burnout, and well-being among students studying online during the COVID-19 lockdown: A 4-country perspective. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:1483-1498.
20. Zis P, Artemiadis A, Bargiotas P, Nteveros A, Hadjigeorgiou GM. Medical studies during the COVID-19 pandemic: The impact of digital learning on medical students’ burnout and mental health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(1):349.
21. Li Y, Cao L, Mo C, Tan D, Mai T, Zhang Z. Prevalence of burnout in medical students in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000026329.
22. Erschens R, Keifenheim K, Herrmann-Werner A, Loda T, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Bugaj T, et al. Professional burnout among medical students: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2019;41:172-183.
23. Tams S, Ahuja M, Thatcher J, Grover V. Worker stress in the age of mobile technology: The combined effects of perceived interruption overload and worker control. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2020;29(1):101595.
24. Almutairi H, Alsubaiei A, Abduljawad S, Alshatti A, Fekih-Romdhane F, Husni M, Jahrami H. Prevalence of burnout in medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022;68:1157-1170. doi:10.1177/00207640221106691.