Abstract :

Background: A Cesarean section (CS) is a surgical procedure that can save the lives of mothers and babies when certain complications arise during pregnancy or labor. This research study assessed the knowledge level, perception and various determining factors for caesarean section among married women of reproductive age.

Method: A Cross-sectional study was conducted among 349 married women of Hetauda Sub-Metropolitan City. The mixed method was used in this study; where face to face interviews were taken through semi-structured questionnaire and Likert scale for quantitative data and Key Informant Interview (KII) was completed with the obstetricians for qualitative data. Data collection was done in kobo tool which was generated to SPSS VS.20 and analyzed using Chi-square test and logistic regression for knowledge level and Man-Whitney test(U) and Kruskal–Wallis(H) test for perception where association were established with p value <0.05.

Results: Nearly six out of ten (59%) had adequate knowledge regarding caesarean section. Factors such as religion, education, gravida, previous place and previous mode of delivery were associated with the level of knowledge. In this study, respondents who had experienced previous CS and normal as well as CS were 2.822 (p=0.002) and 2.578 (p= 0.030) times respectively more likely to have adequate knowledge than those with previous normal delivery. The prevalence of CS was found to be 32.9% among the studied population. Major factors such as preferred mode and previous mode of delivery were associated with the perception. The median of perception was significantly higher among respondents who had previous experience of CS than the group who haven’t.

Conclusion: The findings indicated that most respondents had sufficient knowledge about cesarean sections (CS), despite the increasing prevalence of the procedure.  Respondents who had previously undergone a CS had a greater awareness of the procedure compared to those who had a normal vaginal delivery (NVD). Consequently, stakeholders at all levels of government should be held accountable for ensuring the quality and effectiveness of maternal and child health services provided by healthcare institutions.

---

Keywords :

Caesarean Section, Delivery, Knowledge, Married women, Perception

---

References :

1. Concise Colour Medical Dictionary – Google Books [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 21]. Available from: https://books.google.com.np/books?id=2_EkBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA375&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
2. Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;193(5):1607–17.
3. Robert B, Brown EB. WHO non-clinical recommendations unnecessary to reduce interventions caesarean sections. 2004. 1–14 p.
4. C-Section (Cesarean Section): Procedure, Risks & Recovery [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 22]. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/7246-cesarean-birth-c-section
5. Medical reasons for a c-section | March of Dimes [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 22]. Available from: https://www.marchofdimes.org/find-support/topics/birth/medical-reasons-c-section
6. Angolile CM, Max BL, Mushemba J, Mashauri HL. Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action. Heal Sci Reports. 2023 May 1;6(5).
7. Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 22]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access
8. Population M of H and. Nepal Demographic health survey. 2022;
9. Department of Health Services. Annual Health Report 2079/80. 2080.
10. TOLAC & VBAC – UChicago Medicine [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/conditions-services/pregnancy-childbirth/labor-delivery/tolac-vbac
11. Medscape Registration [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/272187-overview?form=fpf
12. Verma V, Vishwakarma RK, Nath DC, Khan HTA, Prakash R, Abid O. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in South and South-East Asian women. PLoS One. 2020;15(3).
13. Tamrakar R, Sapkota S, Sitaula D, Thapa R, Pokharel B, Acharya S, et al. Cesarean section among all deliveries in a tertiary care centre of nepal: A descriptive cross-sectional study. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Sep 11;59(241):839–43.
14. Yaqoub RM, Khouj MA, Alsaif AA, Eissa GA, Alhemdi JA, Albasri S, et al. Awareness and Knowledge of Caesarean Section Complications Among Women in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Cureus [Internet]. 2022 Dec 3 [cited 2023 Aug 27];14(12). Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/126371-awareness-and-knowledge-of-caesarean-section-complications-among-women-in-jeddah-saudi-arabia
15. Aziken M, Omo-Aghoja L, Okonofua F. Perceptions and attitudes of pregnant women towards caesarean section in urban Nigeria. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand [Internet]. 2007 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Aug 28];86(1):42–7. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1080/00016340600994950
16. Victoria Bam, Alberta Yemotsoo Lomotey, Abigail Kusi-Amponsah Diji, Hayford Isaac Budu, Dorothy Bamfo-Ennin GM. Factors influencing decision-making to accept elective caesarean section: A descriptive cross-sectional study.
17. Begum T, Ellis C, Sarker M, Rostoker JF, Rahman A, Anwar I, et al. A qualitative study to explore the attitudes of women and obstetricians towards caesarean delivery in rural Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2018 Sep 12 [cited 2023 Aug 30];18(1). Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6134512/
18. Tadevosyan M, Ghazaryan A, Harutyunyan A, Petrosyan V, Atherly A, Hekimian K. Factors contributing to rapidly increasing rates of cesarean section in Armenia: A partially mixed concurrent quantitative-qualitative equal status study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2019 Jan 3 [cited 2025 Jan 7];19(1):1–10. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-018-2158-6
19. Maitanmi BT, Oluyomi OV, Aderemi IO, Maitanmi JO, Aminu A, Ojewale MO, et al. Knowledge, attitude and perception of cesarean section among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State. J Matern Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2023 Dec 15 [cited 2024 Jan 20];36(2). Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14767058.2023.2278019
20. Al-Rifai RH, Elbarazi I, Ali N, Loney T, Oulhaj A, Ahmed LA. Knowledge and Preference Towards Mode of Delivery among Pregnant Women in the United Arab Emirates: The Mutaba’ah Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Apr 7];18(1):1–11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33374611/
21. Maskey S, Bajracharya M, Bhandari S. Prevalence of Cesarean Section and Its Indications in A Tertiary Care Hospital. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc [Internet]. 2019 Apr 30 [cited 2023 Aug 27];57(216). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31477935/
22. Prabhu S, Sangeeta2 M. Prevalence, Indications and Complications for Cesarean Sections at District Hospital of Eastern Nepal. Little Bay Publ Orig Artic South East Asia J Med Sci. 2020;4(3):2522–7165.
23. Joshi A, Thapa M, Panta OB. Maternal Attitude and Knowledge towards Modes of Delivery. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018;16(2):209–14.
24. Singh S, Joshi DR, Parajuli B, Khatri P, Shrestha B, Lawot I. Awareness and Attitude regarding Modes of Delivery among Pregnant Women Visiting Antenatal Clinic of University Hospital of Nepal: Cross-sectional Study. Nepal Mediciti Med J. 2024;5(1):1–8.
25. Nuampa S, Ratinthorn A, Lumbiganon P, Rungreangkulkij S, Rujiraprasert N, Buaboon N, et al. “Because it eases my Childbirth Plan”: a qualitative study on factors contributing to preferences for caesarean section in Thailand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2023 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jan 7];23(1):280. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10124050/

26. Mahendra S. Nepal Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Road Map 2030. 2019;