Abstract :

The implementation of Good University Governance (GUG) is anticipated to enhance transparency, accountability, university performance, and elevate the competitiveness of universities to international levels. Despite these expectations, the current implementation of GUG in Indonesia falls short. This research specifically focuses on examining the impact of Knowledge Development (KD) on GUG in public universities in Indonesia, utilizing the Resource-Based View (RBV) theory. The study population comprises public universities in Indonesia under the Directorate General of Higher Education of Indonesia (DIKTI). The sampling method employed is cluster sampling. The collected data are processed using SPSS for descriptive analytics and SmartPLS. The results indicate a positive and significant effect of KD on GUG. In essence, these findings align with the RBV theory, asserting that university capabilities contribute to enhancing overall university performance. Additionally, suggestions have been proposed for future research to expand the study’s scope by investigating other variables that may potentially influence Good University Governance (GUG) and university performance.

---

Keywords :

Competitive Culture, Good University Governance, RBV

---

References :

1. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly–journals/firmresources–sustained–competitive–advantage/docview/215258436/se–2?accountid=17242
2. Blackman, D., & Kennedy, M. (2009). Knowledge management and effective university governance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910997187
3. Greiner, M. E., Böhmann, T., & Krcmar, H. (2007). A strategy for knowledge Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(6), 3–15.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710832127
4. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Arrfelt, M. (2007). Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 1035–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.627
5. Keenan, J., & Aggestam, M. (2001). Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital: Some conceptualisations. Corporate Governance : An International Review, 9(4), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00254
6. Maier, R., & Remus, U. (2002). Defining process-oriented knowledge management strategies. Knowledge and Process Management, 9;3;(4;2;),  103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.136
7. (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.
8. Putra, A. (2017). Menguatkan Tata Kelola Transparansi Informasi Publik di Perguruan Tinggi. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 3(1), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i1.161
9. Raj Adhikari, D. (2010). Knowledge management in academic institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(2), 94–104.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011020918
10. Risanty, R., & Kesuma, S. A. (2019). Good university governance: Experience from Indonesian university. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 6(4), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v6i4.6195
11. Wiig, K. M. (1997). Knowledge Management: An Introduction and Perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673279710800682
12. Yudianto, I., Mulyani, S., Fahmi, M., & Winarningsih, S. (2021). The Influence of Good University Governance and Intellectual Capital on University Performance in Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis–2021–0006