Abstract :

In 2022, the coal-producing sector faced unusual difficulties, which were paralleled by a significant rise in global pricing. The business is too complex for the the most advanced technologies, especially when it comes to figuring out the best blend scenarios. This calls for a comprehensive approach that combines modern technology with careful consideration to support companies in surviving in a competitive and unpredictable commercial environment. Over the past few years, industries have been seeking technological advancement in an effort to improve operating procedures and efficiency, but these innovations still face challenges in being broadly accepted and adopted. In order to determine the primary characteristics that most significantly promote technology adoption, this study combines the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) with purchasing decision theory. The main tool used to collect data is structured questionnaires, which are given to respondents who fulfill predetermined requirements. The replies are gathered, and the SmartPLS 4.0.9.9 software is used to handle them.  According to the study, behavioral intention and behavior manner use are not significantly mediated by unanticipated situational events or other people’s attitudes that align with purchase decision theory. Additionally, users’ use of behavior to adopt digital production platforms in the coal mine business is positively impacted by behavioral intention. Policymakers could consider encouraging all staff members on a regular basis to help them develop a positive mindset, which will enhance their usage behavior.

 

---

Keywords :

Platform Digital, PLS – SEM, Purchase Decision., Technology Adoption, UTAUT.

---

References :

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 179–211.
2. Alkhowaiter, W. A. (2022). Use and behavioural intention of m-payment in GCC countries: Extending meta-UTAUT with trust and Islamic religiosity. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4). doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100240
3. Azman Ong, M. H., Yusri, M. Y., & Ibrahim, N. S. (2023). Use and behavioural intention using digital payment systems among rural residents: Extending the UTAUT-2 model. Technology in Society, 74. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102305
4. Cai, L., Yuen, K. F., & Wang, X. (2023). Explore public acceptance of autonomous buses: An integrated model of UTAUT, TTF and trust. Travel Behaviour and Society, 31, 120–130. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.010
5. Cobelli, N., Cassia, F., & Donvito, R. (2023). Pharmacists’ attitudes and intention to adopt telemedicine: Integrating the market-orientation paradigm and the UTAUT. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122871
6. Everett M. Rogers. (2003). Diffusion of Inovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
7. Goodwin, K. (2009). Designing-for-the-Digital-Age. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing, Inc.
8. Herrero Crespo, A. (2010). The influence of the commercial features of the Internet on the adoption of e-commerce by consumers. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications.
9. Huang, Y. C. (2023). Integrated concepts of the UTAUT and TPB in virtual reality behavioral intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103127
10. Hussin, H., & Suhaimi, M. A. (2008). Perceived Attributes of E-Commerce and the Adoption Decision: The Case of Malaysian SMEs. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242420649
11. Kim, C., Mirusmonov, M., & Lee, I. (2010). An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 310–322. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.013
12. Kotler, P. et al. (2018). Marketing management : an Asian perspective. Harlow Pearson.
13. Mardhiana, H. (2022). Analysis Of Factors Influencing Purchase Decisions. Perception Study Within The Former Insurance Policy Holders Of Jiwasraya Who Agreed To Proceed With Policy Restructuring Program To Pt Asuransi Jiwa Ifg  (Pt Ifg Life). Institut Teknologi Bandung.
14. Monecke, A., & Leisch, F. (n.d.). semPLS: structural equation modeling using partial least squares semPLS: structural equation modeling using partial least squares Recommended Citation Recommended Citation.
15. Neuman, W. L. (William L. (2014). Social research methods : qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Essex: PEARSON.
16. Rouidi, M., Elouadi, A. E., Hamdoune, A., Choujtani, K., & Chati, A. (2022). TAM-UTAUT and the acceptance of remote healthcare technologies by healthcare professionals: A systematic review. In Informatics in Medicine Unlocked (Vol. 32). Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2022.101008
17. Salonen, A. O., & Haavisto, N. (2019). Towards autonomous transportation. Passengers’ experiences, perceptions and feelings in a driverless shuttle bus in Finland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(3). doi: 10.3390/su11030588
18. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). West Sussex: Wiley & Sons.
19. Singh, S., Kumar, V., Paliwal, M., Singh, S. V. P., & Mahlawat, S. (2023). Explaining the linkage between antecedents’ factors of adopting online classes and perceived learning outcome using extended UTAUT model. Data and Information Management, 7(4). doi: 10.1016/j.dim.2023.100052
20. Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
21. TomassMHultt, G. (2021). Classroom Companion: Business Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R AAWorkbook.
22. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., Smith, R. H., & Walton, S. M. (2003a). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View User Acceptance Of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1. In Quarterly (Vol. 27, Issue 3).
23. Winowoda, B. (2023). Value-Focused Thinking and Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Selecting the Best Option in Decision Making at PLN UIP JBB: A Case Study in The Cawang-Gandul Project. Institut Teknologi Bandung.