Abstract :

PT. MAI 88, one of the government company divisions in the Pekanbaru City which operates in the fields of Public Works, Spatial Planning, Housing, Settlement Areas and Land. PT.MAI 88 experienced difficulties, namely that material resources were not allocated properly. With the main aim of prioritizing the procurement of goods for road and bridge construction maintenance, this research focuses on one of the uses of Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM), namely the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine the ranking of each construction goods procurement job. The AHP method itself has been discussed with stakeholders involved in the project. It has four categories and thirteen subcategories that have been determined and lead to 12 job alternatives. The results of the AHP show that the criteria with the highest weight starts from Urgency followed by Public Satisfaction, Quality, and Cost Management. Then for the Sub criteria with the highest weight, namely Reports from local public, followed by Traffic Management, Long-term Durability and Reliability, Compliance with specifications and Standards, Labor Cost, Public Safety, Rent Construction Equipment, Resources Availability, Material Cost, Public Engagement and Communication, Stakeholder Expectations, Ease of Installation and Integration, and finally Subcontractor Cost. The alternatives with the highest weight are Procurement of Road Signs, Procurement of “Urugan Pilihan”, Procurement of Base A Stones, Procurement of Base B Stones, Procurement of Several Construction Equipment, Procurement of Asphalt Concrete Binder Course, Procurement of Non-subsidized diesel fuel , Procurement of Dump Truck, Procurement of Binder Absorbent layer, Procurement of material for Culvert Channels and Boxes, Procurement of Construction Retaining Wall, Procurement of Cementation Work.

---

Keywords :

AHP, Construction Management, Job Prioritization, MCDM., Road and Bridge Maintenance

---

References :

1. Ingle, P. V., & Mahesh, G. (2022). Construction project performance areas for Indian construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(8), 1443-1454.
2. Contreras-Nieto, C., Shan, Y., Lewis, P., & Hartell, J. A. (2019). Bridge maintenance prioritization using analytic hierarchy process and fusion tables. Automation in Construction, 101, 99-110.
3. Hu, X., & Chong, H. Y. (2022). Integrated frameworks of construction procurement systems for off-site manufacturing projects: social network analysis. International journal of construction management, 22(11), 2089-2097.
4. Kumar, A., & Pant, S. (2023). Analytical hierarchy process for sustainable agriculture: An overview. MethodsX, 10, 101954.
5. Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International journal of construction management, 19(5), 436-452.
6. Seo, H., & Myeong, S. (2020). The priority of factors of building government as a platform with analytic hierarchy process analysis. Sustainability, 12(14), 5615.
7. Rahman, M. S. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review.
8. Ahmad, S., Wasim, S., Irfan, S., Gogoi, S., Srivastava, A., & Farheen, Z. (2019). Qualitative v/s. quantitative research-A summarized review. population, 1(2).
9. Waris, M., Panigrahi, S., Mengal, A., Soomro, M. I., Mirjat, N. H., Ullah, M., … & Khan, A. (2019). An application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for sustainable procurement of construction equipment: Multicriteria-based decision framework for Malaysia. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 1-20.
10. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, De Logic of Priorities, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1991.
11. Klanac, G.P. and Nelson, E.L. (2004) Trends in construction lost productivity claims. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130(3), 226–36
12. Tran, D. Q., Hallowell, M. R., & Molenaar, K. R. (2015). Construction management challenges and best practices for rural transit projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(5), 04014072.